Wednesday, December 25, 2024

The biggest lie 'in the end dharma wins' or "dharma is with the winner"

=
Examples of evil winning in life will be provided by me in this post. For those that unaware/ignorant the term KKK stands for ku klux klan. I desire to talk of indians & criminals that are not indian too cause they will prove my claim that dharma is not always with the winner.

Non Indian's:
The KKK - they hid behind masks to conceal their identities & committed countless murders, castrations & rapes. They terrorized innocent people, yet still their group was never held accountable at all, they never faced justice, repercussion or counter attacks at all. They got away with crimes. The obvious immediate question i as a indian need to ask [was dharma with the ku klux klan] since they basically won despite being a gang of evil individuals?

Villisca Axe Murderer - killed eight human beings, mostly underaged minors, he was never brought to justice, despite the fact that his victims were Caucasian/white.
Ted Bundy - he was not affected negatively by karma because he was able to kill over thirty women yet he himself only died once, even if his death sentence is considered justice then still you can argue that he got a better fate compared to his victims. Think about it, he was able to live over a decade in prison with the knowledge that he was a social celebrity & his case was famous, he received countless envelopes that were love letter's from women.
Where's the fanbases & cults for his victims? How many of the names of his victim's are even known? This mr bundy fellow was not only a criminal he was also a child molester, yet still for some reason he lived a better life compared to any of his victims & gained international fame. That is not fair by any means. Here karmic justice did not exist at all, if karma did exist then it seems to be biased in favor of evil people, aggressors & perpetrators.
=
PIN [pure indian national]:
Dawood Ibrahim (yes he qualifies as a indian citizen like it or not), he was born in india so no matter where he lives in i will refer to him as a Indian not a pakistani or anything else.
Even if the day comes where dawood is arrested at the end of the era he has lived a luxurious decent life, has the status of a global elite, has learned, experienced & achieved things that his victims never did & most human beings alive will not be able to do either. So dawood has clearly gained victory in life despite being a gangster, criminal, mafia boss, druglord & killer. Because he has not experienced pain or karmic justice. He has not been given any penalty for his crime, so where is the justice for his victims? Or is DHARMA with dawood then?

For dawood's haters more bad news exists because a individual named "Balasaheb Thackeray" is also pro dawood, he considers him to be his comrade-in-arm's. He defended his property from being destroyed.
Evidence;
Logic - This shows even hindus themselves have allied with dawood despite his heinous crimes, even though people he drugged, robbed/killed were innocent hindus.
=
Gabbar Singh Gujjar - he became famous when a movie character was named after him & based off of him played by amjad khan, imagine how the ghosts/relatives of his victims felt after that?

Crimes done by the real Gabbar;
"He committed a series of murders and dacoities in the Indian state of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. In December 1957, he went on to disfigure several persons in Machhuari, Bhakre, Chammodi and Chirenasta villages."
[ending]
=
Tipu Sultan was a ancient medieval era monarch who controlled a region which was influential in rocket based technology, he fought against the european invaders who tried invading south india, but he was also a corrupt man that murdered innocent individuals, particularly hindus.

Tipu Sultan was rewarded by history nearly two centuries after his death, a serial was created about him & named after him, even though many innocent humans died in a fire related accident while filming the tv series still the indian government allowed sanjay khan to keep filming his serial about Tipu. Is that fair to the victims that died while working on stage? Is it fair to the thousands of innocent hindu citizens that got killed by Tipu?

Even in the animal kingdom their were vicious creatures that gained fame like the Champawat tiger, but no one remembers the names of all 436 humans that this tiger killed?
Was dharma with tipu or this champawat tiger?

In the Battle of Talikota was dharma on the side of anti-hindus? Cause the winners were Muslim not hindu.
=
MB characters:
TKP (the kalinga princess) who was abducted by Suyodhan. Yeah suyodhan lived a bad & embarrassing life he was punished true, but the point is that its not like the kalinga princess ever experienced any happiness, joy, comfort or contentment in her life. She was locked behind closed door's, never went out in public, after her husband & son were killed in kurukshetra then she had nothing to do besides maybe just eat food, she lived in the territory of the pandavas until she committed suicide in the Asramavasika Parva of Mahabharat. And her name is neither known or mentioned cause she was deemed a irrelevant person in the story of this book. So though duryodhan was indeed punished did his victim (the lady who was his wife) ever get any compensation for what she had to go through?

What about ghatotkaca? he can be considered a victim because his life was tributed to null the shakti astra, but in exchange he got nothing, he is portrayed by tv serials as a one day warrior who did not contribute to anything in kurukshetra prior to night fourteen. According to the authentic Mahabharat book of drona parva he was insulted & disrespected by even Shri Krishna despite being a pandav warrior, so their was no mourning or sulking for his death. Ghatotkaca did not receive a honorable funeral its like Bhima did not care for him either.
Their was no mention of what happened to his mother hidimva after his death either. Its like he did not matter, and the whole fake scenes of bhima going on rampages after ghatotkaca died in kurukshetra, those only happen in fake tv serial's like SPK & StarPlus's fake bharat. If you read kmg & bori ce then you will find that Bhima did not commit any deed apart from holding back a few kaurava chariot warriors after ghatotkaca's death. Their was not a single kaurava that died after ghatotkaca vadha & before drona vadha, so bhima did not kill warriors after ghatotkaca died.
Did droupadi (even in tv serials) shed a single tear drop for Vikarna? He defended her after all, i already know that mahabharat (the canonical book) does not mention her crying at all, but my question is for fake tv serials where she is portrayed by rupa ganguly, pooja sharma, pankuri awasthy etc. In tv serials she is portrayed as a more positive, noble woman, she is given more scenes & her life is explored. But even in these tv shows their is no incident of her shedding tears for vikarna or showing sympathy to him for his death.

Final statement;
I myself do not believe in the yuga theory (that at the moment we are living in a kali evil phase) but its quite clear that even if its true then in dwapara yuga still negative characters or people did not receive punishment or get affected by KARMA.
Common sense and realism will tell you that the concept of "dharma is with those that are the winners" is inherently flawed & incorrect. Because imagine a scenario where a incestuous couple had offspring then who really gets punished? Its the innocent poor child that was born with deformities due to the mistake of their parents, thats valid proof that karma does not exist.

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Proving canonicity/authenticity of Parshuram vs Bhishma

Reasons behind creating this post are;
1 - back in the year of 2018 or possibly 2019 a vishnu bhakt/vaisnavite (named "nayonika vats") and the translator's/editors of bori critical edition tried to make false claims of the parshurama-bhishma fight being a interpolation.
2 - My purpose will be to prove that this battle actually did happen since theirs no point in proving that bhishma won fairly cause i already proved that a long time ago in 2022. But i do not by any means consider bhishma to be a great fighter/warrior based on his victory over parshurama, cause for me parshuram is not among the top 10 warriors of MB or Ramayana.

3 - Their have been multiple tv serials about mahabharat, but only a couple have actually tried to portray the fight between parshurama/bhishma. One was chopra's MB (1988) the other was the serial of Sanjay Khan and of course the third is starplus's MB show. Ironically it was the muslim sanjay khan who showed his parshuram (anil yadav) dominating bhishma, their parshurama used an axe and bhishma used a double edged blade/sword, while in starplus (the lesser said the better besides the fact their presentation was the worst). But point is that sanjay khan showed parshuram disarming bhishma then giving him his weapon back so bhishma could continue the fight (basically sparing bhishma's life) yet sanjay khan isn't even a hindu let alone a vishnu bhakt.
The only presentation here which was close to accurate was the one done by CHOPRA cause he showed the battle as it was written which was a ARROW FIGHT. Unfortunately he failed to show parshuram getting knocked out by arrows of bhishma. Overall what im trying to get through to readers is that no tv serial showed parshuram losing even chopra's showed it as a stalemate mostly.

4 - Tv serial's in India have always done their best to guard the reputation of warriors & characters that are vishnu avtaars, even to the limit of insulting Shiva himself. Like in the "DevonKeDevMahadev" serial the directors did not want to show Jalandhar defeating Vishnu so they decided to never show a jalandhar vs vishnu fight, instead they show parshuram insulting & threatening jalandhar to harm his reputation more.
They also dont show that when lord Shiva disguised himself as a yaksha then he wielded a twig which even vishnu failed to move or lift, but these same tv serials will show ravan failing in the fake swayamvara of Seetha. All because of cognitive bias that society has.
=
POST BEGINS.
Cross references for his fight against bhishma:
Anusasana Parva.
"He could not be vanquished by even Rama of Jamadagni's race with his celestial weapons of great energy."
Drona Parva;
"Who is there that is competent to vanquish him who could not be vanquished by thee before, although thou, endued with great energy, hadst vanquished Rama himself in battle, that fierce destroyer of the Kshatriya race, worshipped, besides, by the gods and the Danavas?"
Logic - though this quote is a cross reference for the fight another possibility that is implied by this quote is that the reason parshuram did not take action against danavas is probably due to the fact that they worshiped him. I assume these danavas feared the kshatriyas so thats why they worshiped the man who terrorized kshatriyas (parshuram).

Bhishma Parva.
[quote]
"Jamadagni's son Rama, who was acquainted with every weapon and whom none excelled, when addrest for battle on behalf of Amvya, was vanquished by Bhishma in combat. Thou tellest me that that Bhishma, who was the foremost of all warriors and who resembled Indra himself in the feats he achieved, hath been slain. What can be a greater grief to me than this? Endued with great intelligence, he that was not slain even by that slayer of hostile heroes, that Rama, the son of Jamadagni, who defeated in battle crowds of Kshatriyas repeatedly, he hath now been slain by Sikhandin."
Conclusion - i provided enough quotes directly from Mahabharat which show that the fight happened outside of udyoga parva.

So from now on their should never be a ignorant claim like "the fight is an interpolation" or "this battle was believed by many scholars to be a later addition" just cause Vaishnavites don't want to accept or admit a time where parshurama was defeated fairly.