Saturday, December 7, 2019

Bhagadatta was not the son of Narakasur.

Narakasura's father is Vana:
"O Karna, the slayer of Vana and Bhumi's son (Naraka), Vasudeva himself, who hath, in the thickest of battle, slain foes equal and even superior to thee, protecteth the diadem-decked Arjuna."
Source: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m05/m05062.htm
Bhagadatta's dads father is Sailalaya:
"After the same manner, king Sailalaya, the grandfather of Bhagadatta, attained to the region of Indra by the power alone of his penances."

7 comments:

  1. Shiva incarnated as Durvasa:
    “The Mahadeva, taking birth as the Brahmana Durvasa of great energy, resided for a long time at Dwaravati in my house. While residing in my abode he did diverse acts of mischief.”
    Source: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b125.htm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Then who is his father? Why did he get Narakasur's kingdom?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would tell you if people gave me credit instead of plagiarizing content from this website.

      Delete
    2. Narakasura probably had no son. Once lord Krishna killed Narakasura in battle, Bhagadatta probably took over the kingdom.

      Delete
  3. I think atharva walia should stop talking bad things about bhishma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bhishma translated to "Terrible" meaning bhishma's own name in itself is a GAALI for him, so i dont know why you think i am saying or talking BAD THINGS about this fudhu of the kuru family

      Delete
    2. Bhishma was a pious man who worshipped Krishna/Vishnu. He is the one who gave the Vishnu Sahasranamam to the world. He also protected Hastinapura through decades of instability ever since his father died. Bhishma deserves a lot of respect.

      Delete

?