Thursday, February 29, 2024

Family member's of Karna (excluding the 'Pandava's').

Explanation; these are the biological sons of Adhirath and Radha. The group of brothers who karna was indebted towards. Whose shares of property, inheritance, wealth, love, unconditional care by the parent's was all robbed by Karna.
After they're done getting their attention i will turn my eye to sons of karna. But i will refuse to include Radha or Adhiratha themselves and certainly not Surya/Kunti.
=
BEGIN!
Sanjaya held them in high regard & considered them to be mighty warrior's.
[Quote]
"Radha's son of the Suta caste, and those mighty car-warriors who were his brothers."

1] On the 17th day one of them named Citrasen died a brutal death.
Quote:
"Citrasena turned back and pierced the Pancala prince with three shafts and his driver with six. The brave Yudhamanyu then struck off his enemy's head with a shaft equipped with goodly wings and an exceedingly keen point and sped with great care from his bow drawn to its fullest stretch. Upon the fall of his brother Citrasena, Karna, filled with wrath and displaying his prowess, put the Pandava host to flight, at which Nakula rushed against that warrior of immeasurable energy."
Logic this was either a son of karna or a foster brother to karna, because "citrasena" was the shared name of multiple character's a brother of suyodhana, one biological child of adhiratha, one gandharv king and one son of karna.
Yet another citrasena was a panchal warrior that karna killed by using divine help.

Other actions of this mard;
"Nakula proceeded against Vrishasena, while Yudhishthira against Citrasena."
Comment nobody sung praise for sootputra Citrasen a brave man.

Then he fought Yudhamanyu:
"Srutasravas was engaged with Drona's son, and Yudhamanyu with Citrasena."

2] A nameless brother slain by shri abhimanyu.
Quote;
"Karna's brother, with ten shafts, pierced invincible Abhimanyu and his umbrella and standard and charioteer and steeds, smiling the while. Beholding Abhimanyu thus afflicted with those arrows, although he had achieved those superhuman feats in the manner of his sire and grandsire, the warriors of thy army were filled with delight. Then Abhimanyu, forcibly bending the bow and smiling the while, with one winged arrow cut off his antagonist's head. That head, severed from the trunk, fell down on the earth. Beholding his brother slain and overthrown, like a Karnikara tree shaken and thrown down by the wind from the mountain top, Karna, O monarch, was filled with pain."
3, 4 and 5:
"Arjuna piercing Karna with seven shafts, despatched the latter's younger brother by means of his sharp shafts. Slaying Satrunjaya thus with six arrows, Partha, with a broad-headed shaft, struck off Vipatha's head as the latter stood on his car. In the very sight of the Dhritarashtras, therefore, as also of the Suta's son, the three uterine brothers of the latter were despatched by Arjuna unaided by any one."
Analysis - maybe the amount was a mistranslation, possibly instead of 3 brothers it was 2 brother's that died since only two got identified (their names mentioned).
=
6th]
Quote;
"Then the celebrated Vrikaratha, brother of Karna, pierced Bhima with many arrows. The mighty Pandava, however, soon disposed of him effectually."
[End]
7th]
And in virat war:
"Soon slaying the red steeds yoked unto the car of Sangramajit, the brother of Vikartana's son, that hero decked in diadem and endued with great vigor then cut off his antagonist's head by a crescent-shaped arrow. And when his brother was slain, Vikartana's son of the Suta caste, mustering all his prowess, rushed at Arjuna."

Cross references.
Quote:
"Beholding in the city of Virata his beloved brother slain by Dhananjaya who displayed such prowess, what did this one then do?"

"Even now, O Radha's son, thou hadst fled from battle with me, and it is for this that thou livest although thy younger brother hath been slain. What other person, save thee, having beheld his younger brother slain in battle would himself fly from the field, and boast as thou dost, amid good and true men?"
=
Karna had 2 or more foster brothers alive once the bhargavastra expired and arjuna returned to the battle field.
Quote;
"Karna said unto that prince as also unto those two mighty-armed warriors, Kripa and the Bhoja chief Kritavarma, and the ruler of the Gandharvas with his son, and the preceptors and his own younger brothers."
Logic - pay attention to the key words in its ending "his own younger brother's" Since Citrasena died after duhsasana vadh (before vrishasena vadh) it's possible that only one brother was alive after karna himself got slain.
Anyways TOTAL WOULD BE 8 foster brother's of Karna, wonder how many were equal to hanuman then?

In this tv serial in the 5:04 mark of that episode - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcrrtAnEp2E a authentic brother (Vrikarath) was mentioned but so was a fake one called SHON. I fail to understand the point of creating fanmade ones like SHON when their are multiple authentic ones in Mahabharat itself who could have been used instead.
=
According to events of the 17th night (time period between Shalya Parva's beginning & Karna Parva's ending) the remainder of karnas brother's died too.
Quote;
"The mighty car-warrior Vaikartana, O monarch, hath been slain with his sons and brothers, and other Suta warriors, all of whom were mighty bowmen ready to lay down their lives in battle!"
Logic - but since karna's three sons remained alive on day eighteen its possible not all his brothers were dead, but due to the lack of a karna brother being mentioned maybe its the truth that no karna brother survived the seventeenth day.
So their deaths were not elaborated upon, they happened OFF SCREEN (like a deleted scene in a movie/film).
=
Srikandi was able to prevent karna from taking revenge his vengeance campaign was put to a bitter ending.
Quote;
Upon the slaughter of his son, Karna, with heart filled with rage, addressed that bull among the Sinis from desire of slaying him, saying "Thou art slain, O grandson of Sini!" and sped at him an arrow capable of slaying all foes. Then Shikhandi cut off that arrow with three shafts of his and struck Karna himself with three other shafts.
The arrow of karna would not have been able to murder shree Satyaki anyways.

During the 14th night a similar incident occurs;
Dhrishtadyumna, excited with wrath, took up another formidable bow for accomplishing the destruction of Drona. That slayer of hostile heroes, that warrior endued with great beauty, stretching that formidable bow to his ear, shot a terrible shaft capable of taking Drona's life. That shaft, thus sped by the mighty prince in that fierce and dreadful battle, illumined the whole army like the risen sun. Beholding that terrible shaft, the gods, the Gandharvas, and the Danavas. said these words, O king "Prosperity to Drona!" Karna, however, O king, displaying great lightness of hand cut off into dozen fragments that shaft as it coursed towards the preceptor's car. Thus cut off into many fragments, O king, that shaft of Dhrishtadyumna, O sire, quickly fell down on the earth like a snake without poison
Logic - here it is also an exaggeration, though it boggles my mind why drona stood still doing nothing still their is nothing which indicates this arrow could have ended his zindagi. The same way a warrior is called invincible even after losing like Srikandi was named to be a unvanquished fighter but she lost over a dozen fights in her life.
=
One son might've died in Swayamvara Parva or the aftermath battle.
Quote;
"Jayadratha and Karna killed Saumitra & Priyadarshana while Arjuna was looking. On seeing them killed, Arjuna killed Jayadratha's son and Sudaman, a great bowman and younger brother of Vrishsena, the son of Karna who fell from the seat of the chariot."
[Ending.]
The claim by the author is that this incident happens in a Mahabharat Version known as "Southern recension Kumbhakonam Edition".

Pandavas were in their in-law king Drupada's house for twelve months
"And, hearing of it, they went to Panchala, and there they obtained the maiden. And having obtained Draupadi they then dwelt there for a year."
Note - if the kurukshetra war had so many events in a period of eighteen days and two nights, what could happen in a leap year of 366 days?
This battle also happens in madhvacharya's MB.
Difference I;
"Kauravas along with Shakuni, Karna, Jayadratha, Bhurishravas and others and along with chariots, infantry and soldiers with intent to kill Drupada, started from their city and attacked Panchala. Looking at them destroying his city, the king of Somaka, Drupada, along with his sons and army came out to fight. A great war took place among them."
"Both his sons were killed, armies were destroyed. When Chitra also died along with Chitraketu in the war and the best of Drupada’s soldiers started fleeing from the warground, Pandavas armed with bow and arrows and Chariots came to face Kauravas along with Karna."
Note - the names of drupada's sons who died were different, instead of Priyadarshan/Saumitra it's Chitra & Citraketu.

The other big difference is that no sons of Karna died in Madhvacharya's version in fact whether they even participated isn't verified at all.
=
In KMG their MAUTS (killing'sbegan at day 17 but end on day 18.
[Quote]
"The heroic Uttamauja, putting forth his strength struck the son of Karna and cut off his head which fell down on the earth, filling the earth and the welkin with a loud noise. Beholding the head of Sushena lying on the ground, Karna became filled with grief. Soon, however, in rage he cut off the steeds, the car, and the standard, of his son's slayer with many keen shafts. Meanwhile Uttamauja, piercing with his keen shafts and cutting off with his bright sword the steeds of Kripa and those warriors also that protected Kripa's sides, quickly ascended the car of Shikhandi."

Unknown amount left.
[Quote]
"The two sons also of Karna, O monarch, those two brothers of prowess incapable of being baffled, filled with rage, slaughtered the Pandava army in several parts of the field."
[enD]
=
Vrishasena had divine ASTRAS;
"Possessed of mighty weapons, Karna's son then, desirous of showing his regard for Duhshasana, quickly took up another bow, and pierced Nakula, the son of Pandu with many mighty celestial weapons. The high-souled Nakula, then, filled with rage, pierced his antagonist with shafts that resembled large blazing brands. At this Karna's son also, accomplished in weapons, showered celestial weapon upon Nakula."
[end]
=
One son of karna named Satyasandha was alive after day 17.
Quote:
The high-souled Satyasandha, the son of Karna, stayeth on the field, desirous of battle.
Logic; but it's possible this was a mistranslation and his real name is Satyasena not Satyasandha but who really knows? I am not a Sanskrit speaker.

But if this Satyasandha character is different from Satyasena it leads me to believe maybe Satyasandha was born after the friendship of Jarasandha began with Karna, so he got his title "SANDHA" from Jarasandha.
=
Bhanusena VADH;
"With ten other shafts, Bhima then felled Bhanusena, another son of Karna, with his steeds, driver, weapons, and standard, in the very sight of the latter's friends. The sightly head of that youth, graced with a face as beautiful as the Moon, cut off with a razor-headed arrow, looked like a lotus plucked from its stalk. Having slain Karna's son, Bhima began to afflict thy troops once more."
Note; day seventeen can't be considered the best day for karna as a warrior when events like this almost always happened and mostly during this day itself.
Prasena died before duhsasana got killed.
"Then Prasena, with many keen arrows of straight course, covered the steedless grandson of Sini, and seemed to dance upon his car. Soon, however, the son of Karna, struck by the grandson of Sini, fell down."

After duhsasana vadh then came vrishasen vadh;
"With four fierce razor-headed arrows he cut off Vrishasena's bow and two arms and head. Struck with Partha's shafts, the son of Karna, deprived of arms and head, fell down on the earth from his car, like a gigantic shala adorned with flowers falling down from a mountain summit. Beholding his son, thus struck with arrows, fall down from his vehicle, the Suta's son Karna, endued with great activity and scorched with grief on account of the death of his son, quickly proceeded on his car, inspired with wrath, against the car of the diadem-decked Partha."
=
Final sons of Karna.
18th day.
(Chitrasen Vadh);
"Nakula encountered Chitrasena. These two heroes, both of whom were excellent bowmen, approaching, drenched each other with showers of arrows in that battle, like two pouring clouds risen in the welkin on the south and the north. I could not mark any difference between the son of Pandu and his antagonist. Both of them were accomplished in weapons, both endued with might, and both conversant with the practices of car-warriors. Each bent upon slaying the other, they carefully looked for each other's lapses. Then Chitrasena, O monarch, with a broad-headed shaft, well-tempered and sharp, cut off Nakula's bow at the handle. Fearlessly then the son of Karna struck the bowless Nakula at the forehead with three shafts equipped with wings of gold and whetted on stone."
"With a few other keen arrows he then despatched Nakula's steeds to Yama's abode. Next, he felled both the standard and the driver of his antagonist, each with three arrows. With those three arrows sped from the arms of his foe sticking to his fore-head, Nakula, O king, looked beautiful like a mountain with three crests. Deprived of his bow and his cars, the brave Nakula, taking up a sword, jumped down from his vehicle like a lion from a mountain-summit. As, however, he rushed on foot, his antagonist poured a shower of arrows upon him."
"Possessed of active prowess, Nakula received that arrowy shower on his shield. Getting at the car then of Chitrasena, the mighty-armed hero, the son of Pandu, conversant with all modes of warfare and incapable of being tired with exertion, ascended it in the very sight of all the troops. The son of Pandu then cut off from Chitrasena's trunk his diadem-decked head adorned with ear-rings, and graced with a beautiful nose and a pair of large eyes. At this, Chitrasena, endued with the splendour of the sun, fell down on the terrace of his car. Beholding Chitrasena slain, all the great car-warriors there uttered loud cries of praise and many leonine roars."

(Satyasen Vadh):
"Meanwhile, the two sons of Karna, Sushena & Satyasena, both of whom were great car-warriors, beholding their brother slain, shot showers of keen shafts. Those foremost of car-warriors rushed with speed against Nakula like a couple of tigers in the deep forest rushing against an elephant from desire of slaying him. Both of them poured their keen shafts upon the mighty car-warrior Nakula. Indeed, as they poured those shafts, they resembled two masses of clouds pouring rain in torrents. Though pierced with arrows all over, the valiant and heroic son of Pandu cheerfully took up another bow after ascending on another car, and stood in battle like the Destroyer himself in rage. Then those two brothers, O monarch, with their straight shafts, cut off Nakula's car into fragments."
"Then Nakula, laughing, smote the four steeds of Satyasena with four whetted and keen shafts in that encounter. Aiming a long shaft equipped with wings of gold, the son of Pandu then cut off, O monarch, the bow of Satyasena. At this, the latter, mounting on another car and taking up another bow, as also his brother Sushena, rushed against the son of Pandu. The valiant son of Madri fearlessly pierced each of them, O monarch, with couple of shafts at the van of battle. Then the mighty car-warrior Sushena, filled with wrath, cut off in that battle, laughing the while, the formidable bow of Pandu's son with a razor-headed arrow. Then Nakula, insensate with rage, took up another bow and pierced Sushena with five arrows and struck his standard with one."
"Without losing a moment, he then cut off the bow and the leathern fence of Satyasena also, O sire, at which all the troops there uttered a loud shout. Satyasena, taking up another foe-slaying bow that was capable of bearing a great strain, shrouded the son of Pandu with arrows from every side. Baffling those arrows, Nakula, that slayer of hostile heroes, pierced each of his antagonists with a couple of shafts. Each of the latter separately pierced the son of Pandu in return with many straight-coursing shaft. Next they pierced Nakula's driver also with many keen shafts."
"The valiant Satyasena then, endued with great lightness of hand, cut off without his brother's help the shafts of Nakula's car and his bow with a couple of arrows. The Atiratha Nakula, however, staying on his car, took up a dart equipped with a golden handle and a very keen point, and steeped in oil and exceedingly bright. It resembled, O lord, a she-snake of virulent poison, frequently darting out her tongue. Raising that weapon he hurled it at Satyasena in that encounter. That dart, O king, pierced the heart of Satyasena in that battle and reduced it into a hundred fragments. Deprived of his senses & life he fell down upon the Earth from his car."
Sushena Badh:
"Beholding his brother slain, Sushena, insensate with rage, suddenly made Nakula carless in that battle. Without losing a moment, he poured his arrows over the son of Pandu fighting on foot. Seeing Nakula carless, the mighty car-warrior Sutasoma, the son of Draupadi, rushed to that spot for rescuing his sire in battle. Mounting then upon the car of Sutasoma, Nakula, that hero of Bharata's race, looked beautiful like a lion upon a mountain. Then taking up another bow, he fought with Sushena. Those two great car-warriors, approaching each other, and shooting showers of arrows, endeavoured to encompass each other's destruction."
"Then Sushena, filled with rage, struck the son of Pandu with three shafts and Sutasoma with twenty in the arms and the chest. At this, the impetuous Nakula, O monarch, that slayer of hostile heroes, covered all the points of the compass with arrows. Then taking up a sharp shaft endued with great energy and equipped with a semi-circular head, Nakula sped it with great force at Karna's son in that battle. With that arrow, O best of kings, the son of Pandu cut off from Sushena's trunk the latter's head in the very sight of all the troops. That feat seemed exceedingly wonderful. Thus slain by the illustrious Nakula, Karna's son fell down like a lofty tree."
=
Sarala Mahabharat.
"Karna asked his son, Bishwakasena, to hunt a deer in the nearby forest. That he did but the guest was not pleased."
"He wanted him to kill his son Bishwakasena and offer him his meat. Karna was dumbfounded. He decided that he was not going to satisfy his guest. He could rather live with his curse."
"His guest did not say anything and was leaving. Bishwakasena prostrated himself at his feet and clutching his feet in tearful eyes appealed to him not to leave."

Kasidashi.
"Vrishaketu decided to go and fight. Vrishaketu fought valiantly. Taking the name of Narayana, the brave warrior shot arrows at the daity and Anusalva fainted. Vrishaketu captured the daity and brought him as a prisoner to Yudhistira. Everyone praised the son of Karna."

Vrishaketu's power;
"Sudhanwa was a fierce warrior and no one was able to face him. Vrishaketu came to fight. All his arrows were cut off and Vrishaketu fainted. Sudhanwa then started fighting with Pradyumna. Regaining consciousness, Vrishaketu started fighting again. Sudhanwa cut off the flag staff of Vrishaketu and his charioteer. He then started showering arrows which Vrishaketu could not stand and then had to flee. Pradyumna came to fight and was badly wounded. Kritavarma came to fight and had to flee."
Babruvahan was OP in this variation of events;
"Vrishaketu came and his arrows were all cut off by Babruvahan. Babruvahan then started shooting arrows and soon the sky was covered with arrows, and it became dark. Vrishaketu's chariot was cut off. Vrishaketu attacked and struck by an arrow of Babruvahan, he fainted. Sambha seeing this attacked. He too had to leave, wounded. Satyaki and Bhima came to fight and such was the skill of Babruvahan, that Bhima had to flee."

Vrishaketu was a pandava general in the ashwamedh parva;
"The king had five sons. These sons spotted the horse and captured it.Vrishaketu went to fight first. He was followed by Babruvahan. The two fought and defeated the five princes. The princes went and reported this to their father. Their father sent for his son-in-law, Yama, son of Surya, and asked him to go and fight. Yama came to fight with his club, riding on his buffalo. Seeing him, the Pandava army was scared. Yama defeated all who came to fight him."

Side Conclusion; So the claim done by Anmol Kumar Sharma (an arjuna fan) that "vrishaketu was a fake character" is not entirely true. Yes he was not in kurukshetra (so the bhishma parva line is a mistranslation) but he was likely involved in the ashwamedha campaign.

I like to believe that it would make more sense for Vrishaketu to be a grand son of karna rather than a son because Bheem had a grandson (Anjan Parvan) & Karna's oldest son (vrishasena) should be older than Ghatotkatch so it made no sense for vrishasena to be a childless mard.
=
Note; I have not checked the Puranas for the presence of any son of karna.

But counting in total if you know elementary school math then just for karna's sons (not brothers);
2 sushenas, 1 satyasandha, 1 satyasena, 1 chitrasena, 1 vrishasena.
1 bhanusena, 1 prasena, 1 sushena, 1 bishwaksena & 1 sudaman.
It means that karna had 11 SONS.

If Vrishaketu is added then karna had 12 sons instead. I also remember seeing a movie related to abhimanyu & ghatotkatch which claimed they fought a son of karna named chandraketu before kurukshetra either in udyog parva or virata parva.
=

Sunday, February 25, 2024

The reasons why Wikipedia is not credible as a source in any discussion (TRWWINCAASIAD).

=
Intro: Multiple photos, images and screenshot's will be uploaded & i will choose to analyze reasons why these images back up my claim of wikipedia being untrustworthy and not reliable.
=
A rating of 4.3/10 (for a movie) is considered a positive rating/rank by the individuals who write content on wikipedia.
{This photo is evidence.}
Explanation Anyone with a brain knows that a positive rating/review has to be at least 7 out of 10 or above that number.
=
2ND REASON;
The true air date of a tv serial that Mohit Raina worked in is not clarified by the editor's & author's of wikipedia.
[two screenshot's]
Both screenshots come from the same link one says the tv series "Antriksh" began in 2004 the other says that it started in 2006.
=
3rd REASON;
The fake information provided in the screenshot underneath will now be shown, after that i will explain why the information is inaccurate.
[Image]
The name of Shalya's brother was never mentioned as "Madrasena" in any authentic version of Mahabharat ever.

Quote A;
"The brave younger brother of the ruler of the Madras, that enhancer of the fears of foes, that handsome warrior armed with sword and shield, hath been slain by Subhadra's son."
Quote B;
"Upon the fall of Shalya, the youthful younger brother of the king of the Madras, who was equal to his (deceased) brother in every accomplishment, and who was regarded as a mighty car-warrior, proceeded against Yudhishthira. Invincible in battle desirous of paying the last dues of his brother, that foremost of men quickly pierced the Pandava with very many shafts. With great speed king Yudhishthira the just pierced him with six arrows. With a couple of razor-faced arrows, he then cut off the bow and the standard of his antagonist. Then with a blazing and keen arrow of great force and broad head, he struck off the head of his foe staying before him. I saw that head adorned with earrings fall down from the car like a denizen of heaven falling down on the exhaustion of his merits."

As per that image/wikipedia article Shalya's wife is named "Avantini" (possibly hinting at his wife being of the origin of the royal family of the state called Avanti) but according to kmg Mahabharat his wife's identity was not mentioned by Vyasa or the disciples of Vyasa. And king Virata despite being a interesting character had never succeeded in killing a single relevant or named warrior/character during the war of Kurukshetra. So the info in this wikipedia article is even more fake than what is shown in star plus mahabharat.

Shalya's son was also Rukmaratha not Madranjaya:
[QUOTE]
"Beholding Rukmaratha, the honoured son of Salya, slain by the illustrious son of Subhadra, that Rukmaratha who had vowed to consume his foe or take him alive, many princely friends of Salya's son, O king, accomplished in smiting and incapable of being easily defeated in battle, and owning standards decked with gold, (came up for the fight). Those mighty car-warriors, stretching their bows full six cubits long, surrounded the son of Arjuna, all pouring their arrowy showers upon him."
18th day mrityu (sahadeva killed a 2nd son);
"The ruler of the Madras then slew the steeds of Sahadeva before his eyes. Then Sahadeva slew Shalya's son with his sword."
=
Reason 4:
Here's the photo below.
Now i am explaining why it is wrong. First porus in the chanakya tv serial was only ever shown in his elderly adult phase of life, so just one actor played his character (Arun Bali) the wikipedia page made no sense when they said two actor's played him, when did this 2nd actor (Prakash Dwivedi) come from? He clearly never plays the role of porus in any show.

Lastly in the show itself (if you watched the "Chanakya" serial) then a character called "Bamniis never mentioned or shown on screen at all. This page appears to have been edited by a fan of the 2017 tv show (Porus) which's the only tv series to include a fake character named Bamni cause the chanakya serial never touched on or explored the life of Porus before king Porus became a king/monarch/ruler.
=
Reason 5:
Not all were royalty because two (philinna & nicesipolis) were clearly not of royal families. Nobody took vengeance for the death of philinna, indicating she was not of royal background as no monarchy, politician/king retaliated. While Nicesipolis was described as a normal citizen or a person without any royal family connection before philip married her.
=
EdiT {11:17 PM July 17th, 2024}
Quote.
At the beginning of each match the boxers practice the praying rituals known as the kun kru or thvayobangkoum krou. There are different variations of the thvayobangkoum krou ritual with different names such as "Hanuman ties the bridge to Sita".[30] There are 17 different variations of the ritual.
Below is the link of that citation '[30]';
If you translate it to English using the option, then do CNTRL + F you wont find any mention of ramayana, hinduism or hanuman in the article. So i doubt the claims that hanuman has to do with this martial art.
finisheD {11:19 PM 7/17/2024}
=
Reason 6;
The reign of Darius is confused with length of his lifespan instead, he was born in 550 BCE so he ruled for thirty six year's actually.
But in a different article of wikipedia his reign is considered 64 years, the truth is he did not reign that long at all.
So wikipedia can't even stay consistent to itself on such matters and topics.
=
Reason se7en:
This photo says that Cyrus (son of Parysatis) was defeated in the battle and killed.
The next one states it was a draw/inconclusive war.
Again it is never clarified, theirs always a contradiction, it makes no sense. If it is a draw then why is it called a "victory" for Artaxerxes? They should just label it a win.
=

Saturday, February 17, 2024

Satyaki vs Karna (volume A).

=
Note: This's based only on KMG, i will make another post in the future with screenshot's of BORI Critical Edition. But it will not be coming anytime soon, its release date will be postponed as i have other goals.
Volume B will be about Bori, volume C will concern how day 17 went for both warrior's so day 17 will be excluded from volume B as its only meant for volume C, but part of it (17th day) will be mentioned in this post.
=
Intro - it is no secret that karna fans & even some arjuna fans have underrated/degraded the warrior Satyaki and many ignore the incident's where Satyaki defeated karna fairly. People act like just cause tv serials did not show him that means Satyaki doesn't matter.
Those same people forget Satyaki was present in "bharat ek khoj" (1988), "chopra mahabharat" (1988), Sagar's Shri Krishna (1993), Sahara One TV's Draupadi (2001) & "Jai Mahabharat" (2002). So it's not like he was never shown in any serial. He just did not get explored or done justice in those shows as they didnt show anything important regarding him.

Tv serials ignore most of krishna's wives, they only show rukmini/satyabhama not jambavati, haimavati, satya, saivya or nagnajiti or charuhasini/mitravinda etc. Serial do not show most of krishna's sons either. NO karna fan says those characters are useless cause 'tv serial's ignore their existence'
Anyways i will try not to use gaalis (cuss word's/abusive language) here, we are all fans of mahabharat regardless so best to explain opinions in a clear concentrated manner.
=
BEGIN;
11th day.
It is entirely possible both men did fight eachother this day, but due to Dhritrashtra's questions & Sanjaya's neglect this duel wasn't narrated so what happened remains a mystery. But for this i will give a quote which prove both characters at least approached each other, or looked at eachother noticing one anothers presence on the battlefield.
[Quote]
Bhima and Karna and Kripa and Drona and Drona's son and Prishata's son and Satyaki, the field of battle looked resplendent like the all-destructive sun that rises at the end of the Yuga. The battle that took place between those mighty men engaged with mighty antagonists and all smiting one another was fierce in the extreme, resembling that between the Danavas and the gods.
Then Yudhishthira's host, uttering a shout, loud as that of the surging sea, began to slaughter thy troops, the great car-warriors of thy army having fled away. Beholding the (Kaurava) host broken and excessively mangled by the foe, Drona said "Ye heroes, ye need not fly away." Then he (Drona) owning red steeds, excited with wrath and resembling a (fierce) elephant with four tusks, penetrated into the Pandava host and rushed against Yudhishthira.
Logic - after this line Satyaki got mentioned as being one who drona injured that day. However the credit for making "the great car warrior's of the kuru army retreat" should be given to Yudisther as he led a division which compelled the other warriors to run.
It's hard to believe yudisther defeated karna but before yudisther's interference the duel of satyaki and karna was a deadlock (impasse). Still in the 1st paragraph it was basically 3 pandava warrior's (bheem, dresthadyuma, satyaki) against 4 warrior's (ashwathama, kripa, drona, karna) so the side of satyaki was outnumbered & showed no signs of losing despite the odds being uneven.

Possible cross reference for Yudisther's win.
[Quote]
"When I heard that Yudhishthira, the Just, overcame the heroic son of Drona, Duhsasana, and the fierce Kritavarman, then, O Sanjaya, I had no hope of success."
[end]
Maybe what happened is just that karna went to prevent any pandava warrior from helping yudisther so he got out of the way/fight so Drona would be the one who gets credit of capturing yudisther.
Or maybe karna ignored yudisther and opted to duel satyaki/bheem instead, its also possible that prishata's son here was droopad not dresthadyumn. Still this battle can be considered as 0 to zero for both warrior's.
=
12th day.
Quote;
"Sini's grandson also taking up another bow pierced Suta's son with four and sixty shafts and roared like a lion. And cutting off Karna's bow with a couple of well-shot shafts, he once more pierced Karna on the arms and the chest with three arrows. The king Duryodhana, Drona & Jayadratha rescued Karna from the Satyaki-ocean, as the former was about to sink into it."
Reasons; Satyaki had only 3 supporters (Arjun, Bhima, Dhristadyumn) Karna had 20 supporters (3 sons of Adhirath, 2 kings that Dristadyumn slayed, 15 people that Bhima slayed). It was Satyaki who won despite being outnumbered. He tore Karna's bow, weapons, injured him over 60 times, so much even Drona had to come in with king Jaydrath to save the life of suryaputr karna.

Karna losing at day 12 had similarities to a incident where he defeated Dristhadyumna.
Quote:
"The five sons of Draupadi then, with other well-equipped cars, rescued those maternal uncles of theirs that were sinking in the Karna ocean, like persons rescuing from the depths of the ocean ship-wrecked merchants in the sea by means of other vessels."
LogicNotice the word "ocean" as the karna ocean of day 17 was akin to the satyaki ocean of day 12.
14th day.
This is where it get's sort of tricky and confusing because we do not know if satyaki faced karna before jayadratha died or in the battle after jayadraths death (i am not referring to the night battle because the sun did not set even after jayadratha died the battle continued on).
But i will try tackling this topic.

Proof of the possibility of them fighting against one another before the murder of Bhurishrawas.
[Quote]
"Unvanquished by Drona & Radha's son & Vikarna & Kritavarman, how could the heroic Satyaki, never before checked in battle, having after his promise to Yudhishthira crossed the ocean of the Kaurava troops, being humiliated by the Kuru warrior Bhurisravas and forcibly thrown on the ground?"
[Ending]
Logic - what was karna doing before the 125th section/chapter? Apart from his involvement in group attacks (against arjuna) their was nothing mentioned about karna's involvement in the war itself.

So before the fight against Bheem started it is likely that karna tried fighting Satyaki and was beaten back. The statement of Dhritrashtra is not a reference to a satyaki vs karna duel on day eleven/twelve by the way mainly because Drona defeated satyaki on days 12 and 11 so clearly he meant incidents of day fourteen only not previous day's.

Lastly since theirs never a mention of karna's foster brothers (biological sons of Radha) fighting Satyaki this quote can't be misrepresented as another son of Radha fighting Satyaki, so clearly it is Karna.
=
DAY 14 (Part A).
Satyaki speaks to yudisther.
Quote;
"Those car-warriors numbering thousands that thou seest, are all of royal lineage and are all Maharathas. They are called Rukmarathas. They are accomplished in weapons and battling from cars, as also in fighting from the backs of elephants."
"Thorough masters of the science of weapons, they are accomplished in fighting with their fists. Skilled in battling with maces, masters also of the art of close fight, they are equally clever in striking with scimitars and in falling upon the foe with sword and shield. They are brave & learned & animated by a spirit of rivalry. Every day they vanquish a vast number of men in battle."
"They are commanded by Karna and devoted to Duhsasana. Even Vasudeva applauds them as great car-warriors. Always solicitous of Karna's welfare, they are obedient to him. It is at Karna's command that returning from their pursuit of Arjuna and, therefore, unfatigued and unworn, those brave warriors, cased in impenetrable armour and armed with strong bows, are certainly waiting for me, ordered by Duryodhana also."
Logic; if satyaki defeated the Rukmarathas then logically karna would have confronted him, came face to face or gotten into a duel with satyaki.
Satyaki moved toward Rukmaratha.
[Quote]
That large division which thou seest on left of Drona's host & which looks dark as the clouds consists of the elephants. Rukmaratha is its leader. Those elephants are many, O charioteer, and are difficult of being resisted in battle. Urged by Duryodhana, they wait for me, prepared to cast away their lives."
"All those combatants are of princely birth, and great bowmen & capable of displaying great prowess in battle, belonging to the country of the Trigartas, they are all illustrious car-warriors, owning standards decked with gold. Those brave warriors are waiting, desirous of battle with me. Urge the steeds quickly, O charioteer and take me thither."
Point - most likely the rukmaratha mentioned here was not a relative of king Salya but instead it is a word for a group of people sharing that name/identity. They come from trigarta not madraka.

What Satyaki told to his charioteer:
"Proceed carefully, O Suta, in battle and listen to these grave words of mine. Yonder is seen the host of great splendour of Avantis. Next to them, is the mighty host of the Southerners. And next to it, is the great host of the Valhikas. By the side of the Valhikas, stands resolved for fight the mighty host commanded by Karna. O charioteer, all these hosts are different from one another, but relying upon one another, they protect one another on the field of battle. Arrived at the space left open between these divisions cheerfully urge thou the steed. Pass through the open space between those two divisions towards the fierce and mighty host of Karna."

Action of Satyaki:
"Drona, however, excited with wrath, pursued him from behind, shooting at him countless shafts. Indeed, the preceptor closely followed highly blessed Yuyudhana who advanced without any desire of turning back. Smiting the great host of Karna with whetted arrows, Satyaki penetrated into the vast and limitless army of the Bharatas. When Yuyudhana, however, entered the army, the troops fled away."
Logic - he defeated the army (host) whose chief was Karna. The narrator (Sanjaya) only described satyaki defeating the soldier's of karna but not Karna himself, however since karna is the leader it is likely he fought satyaki and lost against him but it was not described in great detail. Still even if karna did not fight satyaki then it shows a bad side of karna's character again as he did not care about his men being murdered by a enemy warrior in front of him in his vicinity.
Conclusion - while dealing with a dangerous warrior who attacked his rear (Guru drona) he was able to destroy karna's armies easily. Such is the power of Satyaki.

Sanjaya's line:
"Indeed, O Bharata, none amongst those that fought on thy side could resist Yuyudhana of irresistible prowess, of might incapable of impairment, of valour equal to that Of him of a thousand eyes, and looking like the autumnal sun in the firmament."
Point - this'd imply even karna was not able to resist him in a duel. Still not strong enough evidence to conclude that karna faced him or got defeated.

DAY 14 {Part B.}
These quotes prove he actually fought against karna. However these quotes are the ones that happen after jayadratha was already dead and the karna vs bheem fight came to an end.

Quote;
The son of Radha, beholding the ruler of the Sindhu slain, rushed towards him. Seeing the son of Radha thus rushing towards Arjuna the two Panchala princes and Satyaki suddenly rushed towards him. The mighty car-warrior, Partha, beholding the son of Radha advancing, smilingly addressed the son of Devaki & said "Yonder cometh the son of Adhiratha against the car of Satyaki. Without doubt, he is unable to bear the slaughter of Bhurisravas in battle. Urge my steeds, O Janardana, towards the spot whither Karna cometh. Let not Vrisha (Karna) cause the Satwata hero to follow in the wake of Bhurisravas."
Thus addressed by Savyasachin, the mighty-armed Kesava, endued with great energy, replied in these opportune words "The mighty-armed Satyaki is singly a match for Karna, O son of Pandu! How much superior then will this bull among the Satwatas be when he is united with the two sons of Drupada! For the present, O Partha, it is not proper for thee to fight with Karna. The latter hath with him the blazing dart, like a fierce meteor, that Vasava gave him. O slayer of hostile heroes, he hath kept it for thy sake, worshipping it with reverence. Let Karna then freely proceed against the Satwata hero. I know, O son of Kunti, this wicked wight's hour, when, indeed, thou wilt, with keen shafts, throw him down from his car."
Logic - this passage is given here to provide the background/context for why both of them fought eachother, yes it proves that karna could have used the Sakti astra to murder satyaki too but krishna knew karna would not use it on him, apart from sakti astra Karna did use all that he had in his arsenal (barring vijaya bow). Theirs also a mention that Uttamoujas/Yudhamanyu were also going to fight karna, basically do a group attack, but if you read the actual battle then it was the other way around, instead of a group attack against Karna it was a group attack on Satyaki. Also Sanjaya was going to describe other battles but Dhritrashtra wanted him to describe only satyaki vs karna, thus he interrupted sanjaya's narration again.

Fight begin's;
[quotE]
"Satyaki rushed against the son of Radha, scattering countless shafts. The two protectors of (Arjuna's) car-wheels, Yudhamanyu and Uttamaujas, abandoning Dhananjaya's car, proceeded against the son of Radha. Radha's son also, O king, shooting showers of shafts, angrily rushed, in that battle, against the invincible grandson of Sini. The battle that took place between them was such that its like had never been heard to have taken place on earth or in heaven between gods, Gandharvas, Asuras, Uragas, or Rakshasas. The entire host consisting of cars, steeds, men, and elephants, abstained from the fight, Beholding, O monarch, the stunning feats of two warriors. All became silent spectators of that superhuman battle between those two human heroes."
Comment; No interference of Uttamoujas or Yudhamanyu is shown.
=
Day 14 (PART C):
"Both of them endued with great might, each challenging the other, those two warriors put forth their prowess for the sake of their friends. Karna who looked like a celestial, and Yuyudhana, O king, rained upon each other showers of shafts. Indeed, Karna ground the grandson of Sini with his arrowy downpours, unable to put up with the slaughter (by Satyaki) of the Kuru hero, Jalasandha. Filled with grief and sighing like a mighty snake, Karna, casting angry glances on the grandson of Sini in that battle, and as if burning him therewith, rushed at him furiously again and again! Beholding him filled with rage, Satyaki pierced him in return, shooting dense showers of arrows, like an elephant piercing a rival elephant. Those two tigers among men, endued with the activity of tigers and possessed of incomparable prowess, mangled each other furiously in that battle. The grandson of Sini, then, with shafts made entirely of iron, repeatedly pierced Karna, that chastiser of foes, in all his limbs. And he also felled, with a broad-headed arrow, the charioteer of Karna from his niche in the car. And with his keen shafts, he slew the four steeds, white in hue, of Adhiratha's son. And then cutting into a hundred fragments the standard of Karna with a hundred arrows, that bull among men made Karna carless in the very sight of thy son. Then all thy warriors, O king, became cheerless."
Logic - over here clearly the first line indicates that karna was using his full power for the sake of those that are believed to be friend's of his (duryodhan). When it comes to who got hit more by weapons of their opponent obviously karna got hurt more than satyaki, even ignoring the deaths of his driver & horses, destruction of his chariot still karna's body was hit by more arrows. For a time the battle was even but Satyaki gained the upperhand very easily, karna's inability to save his charioteer, companion/guide is a clear sign of his failure. His desire was to attack arjuna but Satyaki came between them both, so karna's goal became to remove satyaki so he could fight arjuna but he still fails to remove satyaki out of the way.
Another way of looking at this is that Sanjaya said the lie "rushed at him furiously again & again" implying that Karna tried attacking satyaki again, by rushing either he ordered his driver to take their vehicle closer to satyaki or it means karna possibly got on foot and tried to advance to Satyaki by running. This leads me to consider the possibility that Karna was defeated more than once in this chapter by the same individual (Satyaki).
They duel again:
"Indeed, when the heroic Karna was made carless by Satyaki, cries of Oh and Alas arose, among all thy troops. Karna also, O king, pierced by Satwata with his arrows and exceedingly weakened ascended the car of Duryodhana, sighing deeply, remembering his friendship for thy son from his childhood and having striven to realise the promise he had made about the bestowal of sovereignty on Duryodhana. After Karna hath been made carless, thy brave sons, headed by Duhsasana, O king, were not slain by the self-restrained Satyaki because the latter wished not to falsify the vow made by Bhimasena. Desirous also of not falsifying the vow formerly made by Partha (about the slaughter of Karna), Satyaki simply made those warriors carless and weakened them exceedingly, but did not deprive them of life. It is Bhima that hath vowed the slaughter of thy sons, and it is Partha that, at the time of the second match at dice, vowed the slaughter of Karna. Although all those warriors headed by Karna made strong efforts for slaying Satyaki, yet those foremost of car-warriors, failed to slay him. Drona's son and Kritavarman and other mighty car-warriors, as also hundreds of foremost Kshatriyas, were all vanquished by Satyaki with only one bow. That hero fought, desirous of benefiting king Yudhishthira the Just, and of attaining to heaven. Indeed, Satyaki, that crusher of foes, is equal to either of the two Krishnas in energy. Smiling the while, he vanquished all thy troops, O best of men!"
Logic - this's proof of yet another satyaki vs karna duel happening this very same day, and one that karna either lost in or the battle was a incoclusive type fight. According to it Satyaki was in a position where he could have killed karna, suyodhana, duhsasana etc but choose against doing so because of the pledges and oath's taken by his friends (bheem and arjuna). Karna on the chariot of Suyodhana tried his best to kill satyaki with arrows but failed in doing so.

Mentioned again.
{Begin}
"Made carless by Yuyudhana, with thy senses no longer under thy control, thou wert almost at the point of death. Remembering, however, that I had vowed to slay thee, that hero dismissed thee without taking thy life."
{Complete}
Logic - Here it's mentioned Satyaki even made Karna faint, as he lost his sense's. So it should be clear that gandus like karna, hanuman, parshuram are nothing.
Still this leads me to conclude that during their two duels of day fourteen, first satyaki defeated karna through wounding him with arrows & ruining his chariot.
After that karna on duryodhana's chariot fought again, but Satyaki made karna faint with a weapon, so he won by KO (knock out) in that fight.
=
Ending for Karna on day 14.
{quoTe}
"A new chariot was brought for Karna also unto which were yoked 4 steeds of the best breed that were decked in trappings of gold & white as conchs or milk. Its kaksha & standard were made of gold. Furnished with banners & machines, that foremost chariot had an excellent driver. It was furnished with a profusion of weapons of every kind. Mounting on that car, Karna also rushed against his foes. I have now told thee all that thou hadst asked me."
Comment - yes he did return but it's not mentioned specifically who he fought against, whether they were foot soldier's or satyaki or another character/person.
Next Chapter;
Hearing these words of Bhima, Arjuna of immeasurable prowess, getting near Karna in that battle, told him "O Karna, thou art of false fight. O son of a Suta, thou applaudest thy own self. Of wicked understanding, listen now to what I tell thee. Heroes meet with either of these two things in battle, victory or defeat. Both of these are uncertain, O son of Radha!"
Logic - it is not mentioned whether karna was hearing all this with his ears or fighting his battle or if his duel was interrupted, what is known however is that bheem complains to arjuna then arjuna threatens to kill vrishasena while trying to explain to karna why his actions were adharmic (insulting bheem though bheem never insulted him). The sun did set after that and the pandavas celebrated until the nocturnal battle began.

Final piece of evidence (to prove this was considered karna's defeat not a inconclusive fight).
Quote;
Then Bhima and the mighty car-warrior Satyaki, both mangled with shafts, saluted their senior. And those two mighty bowmen sat down on the ground, surrounded by the Panchalas. Beholding those two heroes filled with joy and arrived and waiting with joined hands, the son of Kunti congratulated them both saying "By good luck, it is that I see you both ye heroes, escaped with lire from that sea of (hostile) troops, that sea in which Drona acted the part of an invincible alligator, and the son of Hridika that of a fierce shark. By good luck, all the kings of the earth have been vanquished (by you two)."
Yudisther's statement;
"By good luck, Karna hath been vanquished in battle with barbed shafts. By good luck, Salya also was obliged to turn away from the field by you both, ye bulls among men."
=
Debunking excuses for karna's loss to satyaki on day fourteen.

A.1- he was fatigued/wounded after dueling bheem/arjuna on a constant basis.
Refutation - that is not relevant because even Satyaki was fatigued/wounded too, he fought kritvarman, drona, suyodhana, duhsasana, sakuni many times, he also fought countless other opponents, his task was harder and more difficult in comparison to karna's. He fought many more opponents and was rumored/believed to have done more damage to the kourav army than arjuna himself.

A.2 - satyaki had a unfair divine chariot.
Refutation - again this's also just a bias BS claim that does not matter. The chariot never fired a weapon for satyaki, neither did it ever increase his endurance, stamina, durability/reaction timing. A chariot is a vehicle, nothing more nothing less and karna did a group attack so it more than makes up for the difference given by a chariot's quality.

Even Dhrumaksha (general of lankan force's) had a chariot like that.
Quote:
"Dhumraksha, with a mule-like clatter, set out in a celestial chariot to which mules adorned with gold and heads of deer and lions were hitched."
Comment i do not desire to give the complete quote since it made "Hanutati" look good but if you read the next chapter then you will find that a normal rock thrown by Hanuman was enough to destroy this chariot, thus proving that divine chariot's are vulnerable to basic, minor weapon's.

But SO FAR to credit of karna their has not been one incident where celestial weapon's got utilized by him or satyaki during their encounter's. Still karna tried his hardest with regular weapons so he had every intention and desire to kill satyaki but failed, he just did not use divya astras.
=
14th night.
PART A;
Meanwhile Satyaki of the Dasarha race, scattering his shafts as he proceeded, reached the spot where, the valiant Dhrishtadyumna was battling. Beholding that invincible warrior of the Satwata race advancing, Radha's son pierced him in that battle with ten arrows. Satyaki, then pierced Karna with ten shafts in the very sight of all those heroes, and addressing him said "Do not fly away but stay before me." The encounter then that took place between mighty Satyaki and the industrious Karna, resembled, O king, that between Vali and Vasava.
Basic's - Satyaki arrived to the place where his chief general dristhadyumn was in danger, his goal was to save that man's life or prevent him from being captured (since drishadyumn won't die until drona does the kouravs might've tried going for an arrest instead of attempt to murder). After achieving this goal he decided to fight karna.

PART B:
"That bull among Kshatriyas Satyaki terrifying all the Kshatriyas with the rattle of his car, pierced the lotus-eyed Karna in return. Making the earth tremble with the twang of his bow, the mighty son of the Suta, contended with Satyaki. Indeed, Karna pierced him in return with hundreds of long, barbed, pointed, tall-toothed, razor-headed arrows & diverse other shafts. Similarly, that foremost one of Vrishni's race, Yuyudhana, in that battle, shrouded Karna with his arrows."
"For a time that battle proceeded equally. Then thy son, O monarch, placing Karna at their head, all pierced Satyaki from every side with keen arrows. Resisting with his own weapons those of them all and of Karna also, O lord, Satyaki quickly pierced Vrishasena in the centre of the chest. Pierced with that arrow, the valiant Vrishasena, of great splendour, quickly fell down on his car, casting aside his bow."
Point - When the line "thy son, o monarch, placing karna at their head, all pierced Satyaki" happened then its clear their was a mistranslation, what sanjaya meant to say was "your sons choose karna to lead them" but obviously what started out as a one vs one duel turned into a group attack against one person.
For some reason the battle turned against karna's favor again, he was doing alright (contending with satyaki) when it was just 1 vs 1 now when karna had kouravas & vrishasena both for helping him he began losing suddenly.
PART C;
"Then Karna, believing that mighty car-warrior, Vrishasena, slain, became scorched with grief on account of the death of his son and began to afflict Satyaki with great force. Thus afflicted by Karna, the mighty car-warrior Yuyudhana, repeatedly pierced Karna with many shafts. Once more piercing Karna with ten arrows & Vrishasena with five, he cut off the leathern fences and the bows of both sire and son. Then those two warriors, stringing two other bows, capable of inspiring enemies with terror, began to pierce Yuyudhana from every side with keen shafts."
Comment:
Though the last person to get hit in the above passage is "Satyakistill the details of the fight show that Satyaki overpowered, bested and humiliated karna, he was winning the battle, it is similar to prithviraj chauhan vs muhammad of ghor where the person who had the last laugh (muhammad of Ghor) was clearly exposed as being weaker in comparison to Satyaki.
Vrishasena/Karna failed to disarm satyaki or cut off his bow, they also did repeatedly get hurt by his arrows instead.
PART D;
During the progress of that fierce conflict the loud twang of Gandiva was heard over every other sound. Hearing that karna said these words unto Duryodhana "Slaughtering our entire army and the foremost of heroic warriors and many mighty bowmen among the Kauravas, Arjuna is loudly twanging his bow. The rattle also of his car is heard, resembling the roar of the thunder. It's evident, the son of Pandu is achieving feats worthy of his own self This son of Pritha, O monarch, will grind our large host. Many of our troops are already breaking." {then karna spoke again} "Here, however, this Satyaki, this foremost one of the Satwata race, stayeth amid us. If this object of our aim can be struck down, we can then vanquish all our foes. Similarly, the son of the Panchala king is engaged with Drona. He is encompassed on all sides by many heroic & foremost of warriors. If we can slay Satyaki & Dhrishtadyumna without doubt victory will be ours. Surrounding these two heroes, these two mighty car-warriors, as we did the son of Subhadra we will strive to slay them this son of Vrishni's race and this son of Prishata. Savyasachin is before us, coming towards this division of Drona, knowing that Satyaki is engaged here with many chief among the Kurus. Let a large number of our foremost of chariot warrior's proceed thither, so that Partha may not be able to come to the rescue of Satyaki, now encompassed by many. Let these great heroes speedily shoot clouds of shafts with great force, so that Satyaki of Madhu's race may be speedily despatched to Yama's abode."
Logic - the speech made by karna might be hard to understand but i will try to decipher it here, karna believes that if satyaki/dresthadyumn are both murdered then automatically the kouravas will win the war. To me & most intelligent human beings that would make no-sense because the true conditions for victory are either the pandav army gets destroyed, yudisther gets captured or arjuna/krishna end up dead, so how can the death of one dresthadyumn/satyaki possibly give them victory?

PART E;
"The Suta's son, accompanied by a large force, quickly advanced against Satyaki, shooting many hundreds of shafts. Indeed, thy warriors, combining together, encompassed Satyaki."
"Then all those kings of thy army, incapable of being easily defeated in battle, angrily proceeded against Yuyudhana's car, unable to brook his feats. Mounting on their well-equipped cars that were decked with gold and jewels, and accompanied also by cavalry and elephants, they encompassed the Satwata hero. Hemming him on all sides those mighty car-warriors, challenging that hero, uttered loud leonine roars. Those great heroes, desirous of slaying him of Madhu's race, poured their keen arrows on Satyaki of invincible prowess. Beholding them thus advancing with speed towards him, that slayer of hostile hosts, the mighty-armed grandson of Sini, took up and shot many shafts. The heroic and great bowman Satyaki, invincible in battle, cut off many heads with his fierce and straight arrows."
Logic - a group attack was done on Satyaki but fans of karna, hanuman, bhishma, parshuram label him a crook warrior. It's unknown whether karna was also involved in the fighting against satyaki or if he took advantage of this distraction and choose to avoid fighting Satyaki. After this moment Duryodhan seeing the damage done by him chooses to fight Satyaki himself.

PART F;
What a punk like Karna was doing when satyaki was fighting other's.
[Quote]
"Then Dhrishtadyumna & Sikhandin blew their large conchs, as also the twins and Vrikodara, the son of Pandu. Thus those fierce warriors, vanquished thousands of kings; on thy side that were endued with great energy, at the sight of thy Son and of Karna and the heroic Drona and Drona's son."
Note - as u can read he was basically sitting on his chariot like a mute spectator letting his brave allies get killed.
=
PART G - another duel [this time karna had help of his teacher Drona too].
QuoTe;
"Then those two bowmen above all bowmen in the world, rushed with speed against the Parthas headed by the grandson of Sini & by others. Similarly, the Parthas uniting together, accompanied by all their troops, advanced against those two heroes. Then Drona excited with rage, pierced that bull amongst the Sinis with ten arrows. Karna pierced him with ten arrows, Suyodhan with seven, Vrishasena pierced him with ten & Suvala's son with seven. In that impervious wall of Kauravas around the grandson of Sini, these also stationed themselves, encompassing him. Beholding Drona slaughtering the Pandava army in that battle, the Somakas quickly pierced him from every side."
Comment; both were goaded by Suyodhana so they decided to lead a counter attack against all pandava warrior's. And Satyaki became one of the warriors targeted by them. Though it said "parthas" clearly arjuna was not among the warrior's that was targeted by Drona/Karna. The main evidence is the conversation between both arjuna & krishna proving that arjuna was not fighting drona/karna during this chapter.
For the main topic of Satyaki vs Karna its mentioned that a wall of kauravas was around him, this means that a bunch of kaurava brothers were a obstacle infront of satyaki, while karna, vrishasena, drona etc all joined those kaurava prince's to fight Satyaki. However something strange happened as Drona changed his attack target after that, i assume maybe the reason is cause Drona wanted to prevent other pandav warrior's from helping satyaki.
Another thing is that Sanjay claimed Satyaki led the parthas (sons of kunti/pritha) which doesn't make sense as Satyaki was described as being totally alone, theirs no detail provided that shows 2 or more sons of Pritha were accompanying him in this battle. But the incident does prove karna's inferiority to Satyaki again (without celestial weapon's).
=
PART H;
Indeed, many were the combatants of the Pandava army that were then despatched to the other world. Thus afflicted by that illustrious hero, the Pandava host, that night, fled away, throwing down their blazing torches all around, in the very sight of Bhimasena and Arjuna and Krishna and the twins and Yudhishthira and Prishata's son. The world being enveloped in darkness, nothing could be seen. In consequence of the light that was amongst the Katirava troops, the flight of the foe could be ascertained.
Those mighty car-warriors, Drona & Karna pursued the flying host, scattering numerous shafts. Seeing the Panchalas slaughtered & routed, Janardana becoming cheerless, said these words unto Phalguna "Dhrishtadyumna and Satyaki, accompanied by the Panchalas, had proceeded against those great bowmen Drona and Karna, shooting many shafts. This large host of ours hath been broken and routed (by them) with showers of arrows. Though their flight is sought to be checked, they are still incapable of being rallied, O son of Kunti! Beholding the host fly away, through fear, ye Pandava warriors, cast away your fears! Accompanied by all the forces and arraying then, in good order, both of us, with uplifted weapons, are even now proceeding against Drona and the Suta's son for withstanding them." Then Janardana beholding Vrikodara advancing, once more addressed Arjuna, the son of Pandu, as if for gladdening him, in these words "Yonder Bhima, who taketh delight in battle, surrounded by the Somakas and the Pandavas, is coming against those mighty car-warriors, Drona and Karna. Supported by him, as also by the many mighty car-warriors among the Pandavas, fight now, O son of Pandu, for assuring all your troops." Then those two tigers among men, the son of Pandu and he of Madhu's race, approaching Drona and Karna, took up their station at the head of battle.
It's entirely possible satyaki ran here but he only had Dresthadyumna and nameless warriors to help him while karna had help of drona, suyodhan, sakuni & others. It was hardly a fair fight. Its also possible satyaki did not run but rather was helping Bheem (who recently came their).
PART I.
Quote;
"Then those two tigers among men, the son of Pandu and he of Madhu's race, approaching Drona and Karna, took up their station at the head of battle."
Logic;
This one is difficult for understanding too, either it means krishna came with arjuna on his chariot, so arjuna had a battle against the union of drona and karna or it means that arjuna fought drona & satyaki fought karna because krishna would not desire for arjuna to fight karna here.
Firstly the bigger threat to the pandav army is drona but he is vulnerable to arjuna while karna had the sakthi astra but would only use it on arjuna so it was more cunning to have satyaki fight instead. Also madhu's race implies a yadav warrior so Satyaki could be that.

Arjuna's word;
"Go and encounter Karna in single combat this night. The mighty car-warrior Satyaki will protect thy rear. Assisted by Satwata hero, slay brave Karna in battle."
Krishna suggested otherwise;
"Let Nakula and Sahadeva and the valiant Yuyudhana, O son of Pandu, at thy command, slay the other Rakshasas!"
Logic - satyaki the guard position & began killing the accomplices of Alayudha (that were asuric warrior's). So no satyaki vs karna duel here.

PART J:
"Nakula and Sahadeva and the mighty car-warrior Satyaki, having slain the Rakshasas, proceeded to that place where the Suta's son was. All of them, then, began to fight with Karna."
Logic - now satyaki has decided to use the same tactic of karna (adharma etc group attack etc) still he did this after overcoming an obstacle (murdering a rakshasa).

Quote;
"Beholding the mighty son of Bhimasena engaged, the mighty-armed Karna rushed against the Panchalas. He pierced Dhrishtadyumna and Sikhandin, each with ten strong & straight shafts sped from his bow drawn to its fullest stretch. With a number of other powerful shafts Karna caused Yudhamanyu, Uttamaujas, and the great car-warrior Satyaki to tremble."
"The bows of those warriors also while they were engaged in striking Karna from all sides, were seen to be drawn into circles. On that night, the twang of their bow-strings and the rattle of their car-wheels became loud & deep as the roar of the clouds at the close of summer."
Point - the twang of their bows and loudness/volume indicates they were all fighting with full power. Unfortunately this battle looks like it is going in karna's favor. Since no real retaliation was mentioned on satyaki's part and he was trembling cause of arrow attacks.

What makes people believe Satyaki lost this one;
"Exceedingly afflicted by the Suta's son in that battle, many of them entered the force of Yudhishthira. Beholding them broken and compelled to retreat, Ghatotkacha became mad with rage."
Note - the key word is 'many of them' not all of them, indicating its possible satyaki retreated to another division/location or he stayed gravely facing karna, even if we do count this as karna's win then that is still just one victory compared to the 5 defeats he got from Satyaki (twice for night 14, twice on day 14 and once at day 12).

Final action of Satyaki;
"Let Nakula and Sahadeva and the sons of Draupadi and the Prabhadrakas, and Drupada and Virata with their sons and brothers, and Satyaki and the Kaikeyas and the Pandavas and Dhananjaya, rush with speed against Bharadwaja's son, from desire of slaying him."
Point - yudisther gave this order & satyaki followed up on it. Group attacking drona while karna didn't do anything relevant, he got his five minutes of attention/fame & then just went back to doing nothing or goofing off. Random warriors tell him to stop fighting once arjuna granted a proposal but its not mentioned who karna fought & the reason is cause karna's last duel was not worth elaborating on as he probably fought an irrelevant person.
=
15th day.
PART I;
"Drona then, shooting a thousand arrows in the thick of fight, cut off the sword of Dhrishtadyumna as also his shield, decked with a hundred moons. Those arrows that Drona shot, while fighting from such a near point, were of the length of a span. Such arrows are used only in close fight."
"Then the preceptor, desirous of slaying his disciple who was unto him even as his own son, fixed on his bow-string a shaft endued with great impetuosity. That shaft, however, Satyaki cut off by means of ten arrows, in the very sight of thy son as also of Karna, as thus rescued Dhrishtadyumna who was on the point of succumbing to Drona."
Then Kesava & Dhananjaya beheld Satyaki of prowess incapable of being baffled, who was thus careering in the car-tracks of the Kuru warriors & within the range of the shafts of Drona & Karna & Kripa. Saying "Excellent, Excellent!" both of them loudly applauded Satyaki of unfading glory, who was thus destroying the celestial weapons of all those warriors.
Addressing Krishna, Dhananjaya said "Behold, O Kesava, that perpetuator of Madhu's race, Satyaki of true prowess, sporting before the preceptor & those mighty car-warriors. Gladdening me and the twins and Bhima and king Yudhishthira. With skill acquired by practice & without insolence, behold that enhancer of the fame of the Vrishnis, Satyaki, careering in battle, sporting the while with those mighty car-warriors. All these troops beholding him invincible in battle, are filled with wonder, and applauding him, saying "Excellent Excellent!" [arjuna's sentence is over] Indeed, O king, the warriors of both armies all applauded the Satwata hero, for his feats.
Reasoning; Satyaki's goal was to protect his general (dresthadyumn) which clearly he succeeded in. It is then mentioned that satyaki was in a danger zone where drona, kripa and karna could hit him. The most important line is that he baffled the celestial weapons (divya astras) of those 3 warrior's showing that even while using celestial weapon's karna can not defeat him.
Though this was not a defeat for karna it was still a incident where he got overpowered and Satyaki proved to be better, despite dealing with a group attack, also it was Satyaki who got praised by both kauravas & pandavas, so its fair to credit this as a incident for his power instead, though since karna did not run or get disarmed this was not a defeat for him.
=
PART II;
"Beholding those feats of the Satwata hero Duryodhana & others quickly encompassed the grandson of Sini on all sides. Kripa and Karna, of also thy sorts, O sire, in that battle, quickly approaching the grandson of Sini, began to strike him with keen arrows."
"Then king Yudhishthira, and the two other Pandavas, the two sons of Madri and Bhimasena of great might surrounded Satyaki (for protecting him). Karna the mighty car-warrior Kripa Duryodhana and others all resisted Satyaki, pouring showers of arrows on him. The grandson of Sini, however, contending with all those car-warriors, baffled, O monarch, that terrible downpour of arrows, so suddenly created by his foes."
"Indeed, in that dreadful battle, Satyaki, by means of his own celestial weapons, duly resisted all those celestial weapons aimed at him by those illustrious warriors."
Point - satyaki's battle with karna, drona both continued but now took a different turn as Duryodhan got involved. When the line "of also thy sorts" came i think it's possible sanjaya meant "sons" not "sorts" regardless clearly its a unfair battle and it hints at the kaurava warrior's doubting not just karna's power but even guru drona's. They believe satyaki was better compared to both. Otherwise they would not jump in like parents defending children.
Anyways in the second battle though its clearly mentioned that yudisther & 3 more pandavas came to aid Satyaki the issue is that they did not attack any of his enemies, they were said to interfere without actually doing anything. So it can be concluded that 4 pandava's came only to get a closer look at the show (satyaki's battle was like a athletic one/boxing match), the pandavas came to WATCH and enjoy not to actually fight.
=
PART III.
After the above incident (satyaki vs karna part 2 on day 15) guru drona turned his attention to a different enemy, then bheem choose to talk to him so drona choose to abandon the war now using a yogic technique or type of magic ability for separating his soul from his body, while Dresthadyumn beheaded a lifeless corpse. In all this chaos either sanjaya did not pay attention to what Satyaki was doing or Satyaki was just a mute spectator.
It is possible that satyaki vs karna continued but got interrupted when drona said his final goodbye/last words (before suicide). But no detail has been given.
All that is known;
"Even the Suta's son fled away in fear, taking with him his own vast division, that was retreating with great speed with all its standards."
Comment - who was karna afraid of here? dristhadyumna? or maybe satyaki? most likely it's satyaki cause he was the last person to fight karna before drona vadh. It can be considered the first time satyaki defeated karna this day (he defeated him during previous days too but just for this day only as a fresh start it is his 1st LOSS).
=
Their was no more satyaki vs karna duels until ashwathama decided to go on a rampage.
Narayan Astra Moksana Parva.
{Quote}
"Your son Duryodhan that chariot warrior accompanied by Kripa, Karna & others began to cover the Satwata hero with arrows. All of them began quickly to pierce Satyaki from every side with keen shafts, Duryodhana pierced him with twenty, Saradwat's son, Kripa, with three. Kritavarman pierced him with ten, Karna with fifty, Duhsasana pierced him with a hundred arrows & Vrishasena with seven. Satyaki, however soon made all those great car-warriors fly away from the field, deprived of their cars. Meanwhile, Aswatthaman recovering consciousness, and sighing repeatedly in sorrow, began to think of what he should do."
Note - these six men lost their vehicles only, not their charioteer's, bows or armor, they could have still continued the duel shooting arrows while on foot, on the ground instead of a chariot. But instead they choose to run. Sanjaya then focused on ashwathama instead, that indicate karna did not even try to fight back, return or do a comeback.
16th day;
{Part A}
"Thy sons resembling the children of the celestials, with a host of warriors of immeasurable might at their van, all proceeded against Satyaki, that bull of Sini's race."
"Then the son of Surya, resembling the chief of the celestials himself in prowess & like unto the younger brother of Indra, struck that foremost one of Sini's race with shafts whose splendour resembled the rays of the Sun."
"That bull of Sini's race also, in that battle, then quickly shrouded that foremost of men, with his car, steeds and driver, with diverse kinds of shafts terrible as the poison of the snake."
"Then many Atirathas belonging to thy army, accompanied by elephants and cars and foot-soldiers, quickly approached that bull among car-warriors Vasusena, when they beheld the latter deeply afflicted with the shafts of that foremost hero of Sini's race."
Logic - here satyaki first fought with a bunch of nameless kourava brother's, then had a duel with karna, obviously Satyaki won here, then atiratha class fighter's came to defend surya's beta. Like salman khan went to protect his girlfriend in a bollywood film.

{Part B}
"Karna, leaving Satyaki quickly pierced Arjuna with three arrows and Krishna with twenty, and Partha again repeatedly. Although many were the arrows that he shot while slaying his foes in that battle, like Indra himself inspired with wrath, Karna yet felt no fatigue. Meanwhile Satyaki, coming up, pierced Karna with nine and ninety fierce arrows, and once more with a hundred. Then all the foremost heroes among the Parthas began to afflict Karna."
Logic; another win for Satyaki as Karna tried to run away (he'd rather lose to arjun than satyaki again) he got hit by almost 200 arrows.
Countering an excuse;
Karna fans claim that karna merely chose to fight the bigger fish in the pond on day 16 and thats why he ignored satyaki to fight arjuna instead or on day 17 he ignored/avoided satyaki to fight bheem instead.
But if it had been the other way around (like satyaki abandoning a battle with one warrior to fight another) then all these karna fans would've termed that as a defeat for Satyaki.
On day 10 Satyaki was fighting Alamvusha, then when Bhagadatta intervened he decided to avoid alamvusha & go for attacking Bhagadatta instead.

About this line "then all the foremost heroes among the parthas began to afflict karna" this's a obvious exaggeration as the best warrior of the pandavas (arjuna) was not involved in the group attack and satyaki took a break, he paused after firing his 199 arrows at karna's body, the last mention of satyaki in the 16th day is him firing 199 arrows.

Still during their duel the winner on day 16 was obviously satyaki based on who injured who more, when karna was fighting back he still could not gain a single upperhand, he never overpowered satyaki.
=
Quote used by karnian's to prove that Satyaki was defeated once or twice in between days 11 and 16 of Kurukshetra is below;
"Thou hast witnessed it with thy own eyes, O mighty-armed one, how Ghatotkaca, screened by his illusions and displaying hundreds of still slain that night by Karna. Feeling a great fear all these days Vibhatsu could never stand, fronting Karna. The mighty Bhimasena also, moved hither & thither by the horn of Karna's bow, was, O king, addressed in very harsh words such as Fool and Glutton. The two brave sons of Madri also were defeated by Karna in great battle, though, from some object he had in view, he did not, O sire, slay them then. That foremost one of Vrishni's race, the heroic Satyaki, the chief of the Satwata clan, was vanquished by Karna and made carless."
Comment - this's the full quote, now it has inaccuracies, i will explain only one though, that is that Arjuna (vibhatsu) couldn't stand in front of karna.

"Where was thy prowess and where were thy weapons when vanquishing thee in battle the wielder of Gandiva slew Jayadratha in thy very sight?"
Logic - it was mentioned by ashwathama himself that karna lost to Arjuna. Unless u believe the wielder of gandeev dhanush is not arjuna.
Why Duryodhan's statement is not genuine when it comes to the Satyaki vs Karna duels.
Quote;
"In consequence of thy folly, however, O Suyodhana, thou knowest not what should be said and what should not. The man on the point of death beholdeth all trees to be made of gold. So thou also, O son of Gandhari, seest everything inverted."
Logic - Ganga's beta is spitting facts. Clearly Duryodhan was not in a stable mental condition, his opinion hardly matters on topics related to battles unless they are agreed upon by characters that are endued with wisdom.

Duryodhan claimed Salya was a equal to Karna;
"Listen to it, O ruler of men, Karna is not superior to thee, nor do I suspect thee, O king."
Logic - i know he said this just for pleasing or satisfying salya's ego but if he can lie to persuade salya into becoming a driver then why can't he lie further by overrating the achievements of karna?
If Duryodhan really had true genuine faith in karna's power then this incident below should not have occurred;
"The Suta's son (Karna), and king Suyodhana and Duhshasana and Shakuni, in special, could not compose themselves to sleep. Those four passed that night together in Duryodhana's tent, reflecting upon the woes they had inflicted upon the high-souled Pandavas. Formerly they had brought Draupadi, plunged into woe on account of the match at dice, into the assembly."
"Recollecting it they experienced great regret, their hearts being filled with anxiety. Thinking of those sufferings inflicted (upon the Pandavas) in consequence of the gambling match they passed that night in sorrow, O king, as if it were really a hundred years."
Point - clearly the regret these four men had shows that they did not want the war to happen so they regretted their former crimes.

CONCLUSION; So the quote where Duryodhan told Shalya that Karna defeated Satyaki before day 17 is not accurate, trustworthy or believable.
=
17th day.
Theirs at-least 3 incident's on day 17 where Satyaki embarrassed karna, yes it is true that this was karna's day, he defeated satyaki a unknown amount of times, but i will show the rare times where he actually ended up losing to Satyaki that day or at least being outmatched.

{quote}
"Beholding Yudhishthira fly away in that battle, pursued him, shooting many straight-coursing shafts equipped with Kanka feathers. The son of the Wind-god, filled with wrath, and covering the entire welkin with his shafts, shrouded Karna with thick showers of arrows as the latter pursued the king from behind. The son of Radha then, that crusher of foes, turning back from the pursuit, quickly covered Bhima himself with sharp arrows from every side. Then Satyaki, of immeasurable soul placing himself on the side of Bhima's car, began to afflict Karna who was in front of Bhima. Though exceedingly afflicted by Satyaki, Karna still approached Bhima."
Point - Karna wanted to go after yudisther, but it doesn't make much sense cause he already made up his mind to not capture him even if he beats him so fighting yudisther is a waste of time, but due to his desire (to harass yudisther) karna decided to face bheem instead of retaliating against Satyaki.

What happened to Satyaki before the death of anga prince Prasena;
"Having slain next the steeds of Satyaki, the Suta's son then slew Visoka, the son of the ruler of the Kaikayas."

PRASENA VADHA:
Prasena, with many keen arrows of straight course, covered the steedless grandson of Sini & seemed to dance upon his car. Soon, however, the son of Karna, struck by the grandson of Sini, fell down. Upon the slaughter of his son, Karna, with heart filled with rage, addressed that bull among the Sinis from desire of slaying him, saying "Thou art slain, O grandson of Sini!" and sped at him an arrow capable of slaying all foes. Then Shikhandi cut off that arrow with three shafts of his, and struck Karna himself with three other shafts. The fierce son of the Suta then, cutting off with a couple of razor-faced arrows the bow and the standard of Shikhandi, struck and pierced Shikhandi himself with six shafts, and then cut off the head of Dhrishtadyumna's son.
Logic - karna's attention turned away from satyaki because another enemy (Sreekandi) got in his way but its highly unlikely that his arrow could have truly killed satyaki or taken his life away. It's just another exaggeration by sanjaya, though karna did not lose still it is a embarrassment for him due to his beta dying.
{The FINAL duel}
"Then that bull among the Sinis, cutting off with his own keen shafts the innumerable arrows sped by Karna, and piercing Karna himself with many keen arrows made entirely of iron, pierced thy eldest son with eight shafts. Then Kripa, and the Bhoja chief (Kritavarma), and thy son, and Karna himself, assailed Satyaki in return with keen shafts."
"That foremost one, however, of Yadu's race fought with those four warriors like the chief of the Daityas fighting with the Regents of the (four) quarters. With his twanging bow stretched to its fullest limits & from which shafts flowed incessantly, Satyaki became exceedingly irresistible like the meridian Sun in the autumnal sky."
"Those scorchers of foes then the mighty car-warriors among the Pancalas, once more riding on their cars and clad in mail and united together, protected that foremost one among the Sinis, like the Maruts protecting Sakra while engaged in afflicting his foes in battle. The battle fraught with the slaughter of men and steeds and elephants that then ensued between thy foes and the warriors of thy army, became so fierce that it resembled the encounter in days of old between the gods and the Asuras."
Chronology - This incident happened right before duhsasana's death & after five pancala royal warriors (brothers to draupadi) were beaten by karna.
Detail's - Satyaki first checked arrows of karna, then injured karna, duryodhan both with arrows. Next kripa, kritvarman both came to help them, karna, duryodhan also retaliated so satyaki was alone vs four major warriors.
Result - Satyaki held all of them in place/check for some time, not letting any even karna move forward, they failed to advance a single step ahead, then panchalas came to help satyaki and it became a devasur sangram.
The next mention of karna was him being challenged by Bheem to save duhsasana, which he failed in accepting or acting upon. Though this incident is no defeat for karna it still is a sign of him being overpowered or failing miserably.
=
WHO LOST MORE?
Calculating it in simple terms. The answer is clearly karna lost more.

Satyaki defeated Karna 7 times:
Even if we remove the 12th day because it was written (after karna got rescued by Jayadratha) that karna was frightening (scaring/intimidating) his opponent (so its a inconclusive match). Then still karna fans must consider the remaining incidents.
On day 14 Satyaki defeated karna twice, first a solo match, after that it was karna with a group that lost again to Satyaki, so karna became a two time loser in that scenario/battle.
On the 14th night first Satyaki defeated karna in a one vs one scenario even creating a situation where karna felt his dear vrishasena to be dead. This led karna to run away to Suyodhan & ask him to do the same group attack they did against abhimanyu 36 hours ago.
Again on the 15th day Satyaki defeated karna twice. So far that is (five) defeats for karna.

For day 16 before arjuna's interference satyaki was winning & karna decided to attack arjuna (the moment he saw him) instead of continuing the unfinished battle with Satyaki. So we can term this as karna's defeat again, as he was already considered in danger before arjuna's entrance and satyaki held the upper hand.
Finally day 17 after prasena's death Satyaki alone countered & overpowered the group attack done by karna, kripacharya/kritvarman. So he had 7 victories over karna. The prasena vadh incident occurs after karna is mentioned wielding vijaya dhanush too.
=
Karna defeated Satyaki once in the 14th night, first by cheating (group attack with drona's help before any ghatotkatch interference happens). In their last duel during the night karna did counter a group attack but no evidence has been shown of Satyaki running away from him.
Even if it is considered a defeat the still its only 2 wins for karna in comparison to Satyaki's wins its clear who was better.
Common sense/logic tells you Satyaki was superior, theirs only one thing he'd need to worry for that is the sakthi astra of indra/karna but all other divine weapons dont matter cause satyaki nulled each divine weapon karna used on day 15.

Satyaki lost 2 times Karna lost 7 times, losing more does not equal better, it actually means you are worse/weaker. So karna is inferior compared to Satyaki. This's as much of a fact as Rajpal Yadav being inferior to Suniel Shetty.
=