Intro: Multiple photos, images and screenshot's will be uploaded & i will choose to analyze reasons why these images back up my claim of wikipedia being untrustworthy and not reliable.
=
A rating of 4.3/10 (for a movie) is considered a positive rating/rank by the individuals who write content on wikipedia.
{This photo is evidence.}
Explanation - Anyone with a brain knows that a positive rating/review has to be at least 7 out of 10 or above that number.
=
2ND REASON;
The true air date of a tv serial that Mohit Raina worked in is not clarified by the editor's & author's of wikipedia.
[two screenshot's]
Both screenshots come from the same link one says the tv series "Antriksh" began in 2004 the other says that it started in 2006.
=
3rd REASON;
The fake information provided in the screenshot underneath will now be shown, after that i will explain why the information is inaccurate.
[Image]
The name of Shalya's brother was never mentioned as "Madrasena" in any authentic version of Mahabharat ever.
Quote A;
"The brave younger brother of the ruler of the Madras, that enhancer of the fears of foes, that handsome warrior armed with sword and shield, hath been slain by Subhadra's son."
Quote B;
"Upon the fall of Shalya, the youthful younger brother of the king of the Madras, who was equal to his (deceased) brother in every accomplishment, and who was regarded as a mighty car-warrior, proceeded against Yudhishthira. Invincible in battle desirous of paying the last dues of his brother, that foremost of men quickly pierced the Pandava with very many shafts. With great speed king Yudhishthira the just pierced him with six arrows. With a couple of razor-faced arrows, he then cut off the bow and the standard of his antagonist. Then with a blazing and keen arrow of great force and broad head, he struck off the head of his foe staying before him. I saw that head adorned with earrings fall down from the car like a denizen of heaven falling down on the exhaustion of his merits."
As per that image/wikipedia article Shalya's wife is named "Avantini" (possibly hinting at his wife being of the origin of the royal family of the state called Avanti) but according to kmg Mahabharat his wife's identity was not mentioned by Vyasa or the disciples of Vyasa. And king Virata despite being a interesting character had never succeeded in killing a single relevant or named warrior/character during the war of Kurukshetra. So the info in this wikipedia article is even more fake than what is shown in star plus mahabharat.
Shalya's son was also Rukmaratha not Madranjaya:
[QUOTE]
"Beholding Rukmaratha, the honoured son of Salya, slain by the illustrious son of Subhadra, that Rukmaratha who had vowed to consume his foe or take him alive, many princely friends of Salya's son, O king, accomplished in smiting and incapable of being easily defeated in battle, and owning standards decked with gold, (came up for the fight). Those mighty car-warriors, stretching their bows full six cubits long, surrounded the son of Arjuna, all pouring their arrowy showers upon him."
18th day mrityu (sahadeva killed a 2nd son);
"The ruler of the Madras then slew the steeds of Sahadeva before his eyes. Then Sahadeva slew Shalya's son with his sword."
=
Reason 4:
Here's the photo below.
.png)
Now i am explaining why it is wrong. First porus in the chanakya tv serial was only ever shown in his elderly adult phase of life, so just one actor played his character (Arun Bali) the wikipedia page made no sense when they said two actor's played him, when did this 2nd actor (Prakash Dwivedi) come from? He clearly never plays the role of porus in any show.
Lastly in the show itself (if you watched the "Chanakya" serial) then a character called "Bamni" is never mentioned or shown on screen at all. This page appears to have been edited by a fan of the 2017 tv show (Porus) which's the only tv series to include a fake character named Bamni cause the chanakya serial never touched on or explored the life of Porus before king Porus became a king/monarch/ruler.
=
Reason 5:
=
EdiT {11:17 PM July 17th, 2024}
Quote.
At the beginning of each match the boxers practice the praying rituals known as the kun kru or thvayobangkoum krou. There are different variations of the thvayobangkoum krou ritual with different names such as "Hanuman ties the bridge to Sita".[30] There are 17 different variations of the ritual.
Below is the link of that citation '[30]';
If you translate it to English using the option, then do CNTRL + F you wont find any mention of ramayana, hinduism or hanuman in the article. So i doubt the claims that hanuman has to do with this martial art.
finisheD {11:19 PM 7/17/2024}
=
Reason 6;
The reign of Darius is confused with length of his lifespan instead, he was born in 550 BCE so he ruled for thirty six year's actually.
But in a different article of wikipedia his reign is considered 64 years, the truth is he did not reign that long at all.
So wikipedia can't even stay consistent to itself on such matters and topics.
=
Reason se7en:
This photo says that Cyrus (son of Parysatis) was defeated in the battle and killed.
The next one states it was a draw/inconclusive war.
Again it is never clarified, theirs always a contradiction, it makes no sense. If it is a draw then why is it called a "victory" for Artaxerxes? They should just label it a win.
=
No comments:
Post a Comment
?