Wednesday, March 7, 2018

The ages of Mahabharata characters written by Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa

This post is my attempt to find out how old each of the major characters of the epic Mahabharata were during the time of the war of Kurukshetra and before it.
Pandavas are old enough to be grandfathers they had alot of grandchildren.
The first piece of evidence:
I will slay within the twinkling of an eye the Panchalas, the Karushas, the Matsyas, and the sons of Pritha with their sons and grandsons.”
The second piece of evidence:
 Beholding his sons, grandsons, and friends all slain in battle, the king's soul became overwhelmed with great grief, O Janamejaya! Recollecting those sons and grandsons and brothers and allies, a deep sorrow took possession of the illustrious monarch.”
The third piece of evidence:
"The king, then, recollecting his sons and grandsons and kinsmen and friends, became filled with anxiety and grief."
It says “grandsons” (meaning more than one) not grandson (just one). The only grandson of the Pandavas (that fought in the war) whose name is mentioned is Anjanaparvan (the son of Ghatotkatcha), but their were other grandsons who fought and died in the war he wasn’t the only one.
Also Ghatotkatcha was born before any of the Upapandavas, so maybe his son Anjanaparvan was nearly as old as Ghatotkatcha’s half brothers/cousins (the upapandavas).

Arjuna's statement about the Gandiva bow:
And finally Parthap. 75 surnamed Swetavahana, 1 hath held it for five and sixty years. 2 Endued with great energy and of high celestial origin, this is the best of all bows.
Analysis: This means that at the time of the Go-harana war the bow known as Gandiva was already held by Arjuna for 65 years! Note that Arjuna was talking about himself in a third person perspective.

Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04043.htm


    • Meaning of the Nilakantha text

Quote:
75:2 Nilakantha spends much learning and ingenuity in making out that sixty-five years in this connection means thirty-two years of ordinary human computation.
Analysis: Someone called Rishabh Rakesh decided to cherry pick this quote but fails to realize it's true meaning. The meaning of this quote is for ordinary human's capacity. And Arjuna was not an ordinary human, so this cannot be used to say that the years in Mahabharata are only 49 percent of one year in the numerical system that we use nowadays. Also according to karna fans, footnotes are not a part of the original epic. And i tend to somewhat agree with this claim, because most times the translators themselves are nto sure of what they are doing and writing. Also by this 0.49 of a year logic, Arjuna would have been 13 years old (a mere adolescent) at the time of the Swayamvara. Which is not believable at all.

Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04043.htm

  • How long was Arjuna's Tirtha-Yatra?
    • The vow announced
Quote:
The illustrious Pandavas, thus addressed by the great Rishi Narada, consulting with one another, established a rule amongst themselves in the presence of the celestial Rishi himself endued with immeasurable energy. And the rule they made was that when one of them would be sitting with Draupadi, any of the other four who would see that one thus must retire into the forest for twelve years, passing his days as a Brahmacharin.
Analysis: The Pandavas made this vow in-front of Narada, the same Narada who they worship, respect and honor. They would certainly adhere to it.

Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01215.htm
    • References about the vow several times
      • Vaisamapayana's description of Arjuna's exile
Quote:
'Obtaining then the king's permission, Arjuna prepared himself for a forest-life; and he went to the forest to live there for twelve years.'
Analysis: Vaisampayana also agrees that it was 12 years. He reported years, not months, not seasons but years to Janamejaya.

      • Ulupi refers about the vow to Arjuna
Quote:
'I know, O son of Pandu, why thou wanderest over the earth, and why thou hast been commanded to lead the life of a Brahmacharin by the superior. Even this was the understanding to which all of you had been pledged, viz., that amongst you all owning Drupada's daughter as your common wife, he who would from ignorance enter the room where one of you would be sitting with her, should lead the life of a Brahmacharin in the woods for twelve years.
Analysis: So not just people of the Kshatriya countries but also people of the outcast lands like the Nagas know about the specific details about Arjuna's tirtha yatra and how long it is. It was a universal fact that it was 12 years long.

        • Conclusion: Arjuna's tirtha-yatra was twelve (12) years long. Their has been a counterargument saying that a general of the army (Arjuna) could not stay absent for 12 years. But that is simply not true since the Pandava empire was well protected without Arjuna as well. They had alliances with the Yadavas & Pancalas. So the claim in itself is ludicrous that Arjuna could not have been away for that many years. Case closed it was 12 years.
  • When did the Kouravas have children?
    • At birth
Quote:
And, O, king, worthy wives were in time selected for all of them by Dhritarashtra after proper examination. And king Dhritarashtra, O monarch, also bestowed Duhsala, in proper time and with proper rites, upon Jayadratha (the king of Sindhu).'
Analysis: This is said as the answer to Janamejaya's question about the Kauravas. Basically all Kauravas had wives, but we do not know how many of them had sons.
    • Prior to Varanavata
      • Duryodhana talks to Dhritarashtra
Quote:
In that case, O king of the world, ourselves with our children, excluded from the royal line, shall certainly be disregarded by all men. Therefore, O monarch, adopt such counsels that we may not suffer perpetual distress, becoming dependent on others for our food. 
Analysis: Duryodhana said his children, so one can assume that he and his (some of them) brothers already had sons at this point in time.



        • Wives of the Kouravas part 2
Quote:
Meanwhile the Pandavas got into their cars, yoking thereto some fine horses endued with the speed of wind. While they were on the point of entering their cars, they touched, in great sorrow, the feet of Bhishma, of king Dhritarashtra, of the illustrious Drona, of Kripa, of Vidura and of the other elders of the Kuru race. Then saluting with reverence all the older men, and embracing their equals, receiving the farewell of even the children, and taking leave of all the venerable ladies in their household, and walking round them respectfully, and bidding farewell unto all the citizens, the Pandavas, ever mindful of their vows, set out for Varanavata.
Analysis: The ladies of the household had to have been the wives of the Kouravas. They could not have been Satayvati, Amvika, Amvalika etc (because they already left after Pandu's death). It talks about the household of the Kurus, so those children could be the sons of the Kauravas.

    • More proof of having children before Swayamvara Parva
Quote:
Else this very day, filled with wrath, I would send thee, (O Duryodhana), to the regions of Yama (Pluto) with thy children and friends and brothers, and Karna, and (Sakuni) the son of Suvala! But what can I do, for, ye sinful wretches, the virtuous king Yudhishthira, the eldest of the Pandavas, is not yet angry with you?'
Analysis: Even Bhima says that their were children of Duryodhana alive at this point in their lives. And it's only been a year since he last met Duryodhana.

    • After Droupadi Swayamvara
Quote:
O sinless one, thou actest not, O king, in the way thou shouldst! O father, we should now act every day in such a way as to weaken (the strength of) the Pandavas. The time hath come, O father, for us to take counsel together, so that the Pandavas may not swallow us all with our children and friends and relatives.
Analysis: Duryodhana & Karna talk about themselves having children, so this proves they were (both) already fathers at the time of the Swayamvara of Draupadi.

Sourcehttp://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01203.htm

    • How old were Duryodhana and Karna (at that time alone)?
Quote:
Duryodhana and Karna and Sakuni, the son of Suvala, are sinful, foolish and young; listen not to them.
Analysis: I can understand if Vidura calls Duryodhana young, but Sakuni? Karna? Karna is considered sixteen years older than Yudhishthira. Vidura was an uncle of Duryodhan and Sakuni was also a uncle of Duryodhana. Yet here one uncle is calling another uncle young?

      • Conclusion: So all of the quotes point to the fact that the Kauravas became fathers before the Pandavas even married their wives. The Kauravas led by Duryodhana were already husbands and fathers, that too much before the Pandavas.

  • The age of Sakuni
    • Earliest mention of Sakuni
Quote:
Sakuni, the son of Suvala, bringing unto the Kurus his sister endued with youth and beauty, formally gave her away unto Dhritarashtra. And Gandhari was received with great respect and the nuptials were celebrated with great pomp under Bhishma's directions. And the heroic Sakuni, after having bestowed his sister along with many valuable robes, and having received Bhishma's adorations, returned to his own city.
Analysis: So contrary to popular belief Sakuni did nto stay in Hastinapore at all. He never stayed behind with the Kauravas with Gandhari and Dhritarashtra. Karna and the Kauravas were always alone.
    • Sakuni's involvement in the poisoning
Quote:
"Some time after, Duryodhana again mixed in the food of Bhima a poison that was fresh, virulent, and very deadly. But Yuyutsu (Dhritarashtra's son by a Vaisya wife), moved by his friendship for the Pandavas, informed them of this. Vrikodara, however, swallowed it without any hesitation, and digested it completely. And, though virulent the poison produced no effects on Bhima. "When that terrible poison intended for the destruction of Bhima failed of its effect, Duryodhana. Karna and Sakuni, without giving up their wicked design had recourse to numerous other contrivances for accomplishing the death of the Pandavas. 
Analysis: This proves that Sakuni was only involved in the second poisoning of Bhima. After this he is not mentioned at all until the lac house incident. He (Sakuni) wasn't even present in the Tournament. The first poisoning was done by Duryodhana alone (he was advised by Karna though Karna told him to do it), int eh second poisoning Sakuni & Karna (again) were both involved.

    • Sakuni's statement to Yudhishthira
Quote:
"Sakuni said,--'One that is intoxicated falleth into a pit (hell) and stayeth there deprived of the power of motion. Thou art, O king, senior to us in age, and possessed of the highest accomplishments. O bull of the Bharata race, I (beg my pardon and) bow to thee. Thou knowest, O Yudhishthira, that gamesters, while excited with play, utter such ravings that they never indulge in the like of them in their waking moments nor even in dream.'
Analysis: Over here Sakuni straight up admitted that he is younger to not just Yudhishthira. He did call Yudhishthira his senior. But does it make sense? Could this not be a later addition? Sakuni gave away Gandhari to Dhritarashtra before the birth of Yudhishthira. Yet here he says Yudhishthira is older? No that is not the truth it has to be a lie or their has to be a different meaning, or Yudhishthira was born before the birth of Sakuni. Could it be that Yudhishthira was not an offspring but an adopted child? It seems unlikely but possible the possibility is their. 

Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m02/m02064.htm
  • Question: How many years in between Tirtha-yatra and Khandava-Daha?
    • Answer: Enough years for the Pandavas next generation to be born. And to reach such an age where they could partake in warfare education and be trained under Arjuna.
Quote:
The sons of Draupadi were born, each at the interval of one year, and all of them became renowned and much attached to one another. And, O monarch, all their rites of infancy and childhood, such as Chudakarana and Upanayana (first shave of the head and investiture with the sacred threads) were performed by Dhaumya according to the ordinance. All of them, of excellent behaviour and vows, after having studied the Vedas, acquired from Arjuna a knowledge of all the weapons, celestial and human.
Analysis: The text says that all the sons of Draupadi were well known and famous. Now think about how old the Pandavas were when they received education in warfare? The sons of Draupadi received education under Arjuna. The sons of Draupadi would have to be at-least teenagers. They were each (five total) one year apart from each other in age. So the youngest would be 14 and the oldest would be 18 or more (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). I do not believe Yudhishthira would wait for Arjuna before he has a son with Draupadi but even if he did we cannot ignore the fact that Arjuna's son with Draupadi was born after the tirtha yatra. It would take Arjuna's son 1 year to be born (9 months but that's very close to a year). And 14 more years to mature into eligible age.

    • Conclusion: So the Khandava Daha had to have occurred 15 years after the Tirtha Yatra.
  • Arjuna's age.
    • Arjuna's chronology.
      • When his birth happened
        • Tapasya to get Indra's approval
Quote:
After this, the Kuru king Pandu, taking counsel with the great Rishis commanded Kunti to observe an auspicious vow for one full year, while he himself commenced, O Bharata, to stand upon one leg from morning to evening, and practise other severe austerities with mind rapt in meditation, for gratifying the lord of the celestials.
Analysis: They did this for a whole year (after the birth of Bhima). So Arjuna is at-least one year younger.

          • Age difference of Pandavas.
Quote:
The eldest of Kunti's children was called Yudhishthira, the second Bhimasena, and the third Arjuna, and of Madri's sons, the first-born of the twins was called Nakula and the next Sahadeva. And those foremost sons born at an interval of one year after one another, looked like an embodied period of five years.
Analysis: Some people may believe that if we consider this quote then that means Arjuna was one year younger to Bhima who was a year younger than Yudhishthira. But let us consider this, the difference cannot be five years if each of them were born at an interval of just one year. Because Nakula and Sahadeva were born during the same year. So that negates the claim of them being born in interval of a year. Nakula and Sahadeva were twins they were born the same day. the Pandavas can indeed be a embodied period of five years if we consider the fact that Arjuna is two year younger than Bhima who is a year younger than Yudhishthira. The same Arjuna is just one year older than Nakula and Sahadeva.

      • When Pandu died
        • Arjuna was old enough to have studied the vedas (you have to be at-least 5 years old).
Quote:
The birth, growth, and Vedic studies of these children of Pandu, will, no doubt, give you great pleasure. Steadily adhering to the path of the virtuous and the wise, and leaving behind him these children, Pandu departed hence seventeen days ago. 
Analysis: So the Pandavas were probably not even that old when their father died. They were not 18, 16, 17, 15, 14 etc. They were not teenagers and they were not adolescents. Although we can make many guesses and inferences the sad truth is that the age of the Pandavas (when Pandu died) was never stated and has been lost forever. We don't know, i don't know. It's not given in the real Mahabharata.

      • Completion of education
Quote 1:
but Arjuna, however, outdistanced everyone in every respect--in intelligence, resourcefulness, strength and perseverance. Accomplished in all weapons, Arjuna became the foremost of even the foremost of car-warriors; and his fame spread all over the earth to the verge of the sea. And although the instruction was the same, the mighty Arjuna excelled all (the princes in lightness of hand). Indeed, in weapons as in devotion to his preceptor, he became the foremost of them all. And amongst all the princes, Arjuna alone became an Atiratha (a car-warrior capable of fighting at one time with sixty thousand foes). And the wicked sons of Dhritarashtra, beholding Bhimasena endued with great strength and Arjuna accomplished in all arms, became very jealous of them.
Analysis 1: Arjuna gained a lot of expertise in the use of weapons over here. This could not have happened in just a short amount of time like a few days. I think it would have taken Arjuna at-least a year. One year of training to gain the type of mastery that he gained.


Quote 2:
And having performed the propitiatory rites, the youthful Phalguna, equipped with the finger protector (gauntlet) and his quiver full of shafts and bow in hand, donning his golden mail, appeared in the lists even like an evening cloud reflecting the rays of the setting sun and illumined by the hues of the rainbow and flashes of lightning.
Analysis 2: This text tells us many things. It shows that Arjuna had armor on him meaning he was old enough to fight a war. It also calls him youthful, so he has to be a teenager at this time. Even 14 year-olds have mustaches these days, so i'll put Arjuna at the age of 18.

      • Pre-lac house days
Quote:
'After the expiration, O king, of a year from this, Dhritarashtra, moved by kindness for the people, installed Yudhishthira, the son of Pandu, as the heir-apparent of the kingdom on account of his firmness, fortitude, patience, benevolence, frankness and unswerving honesty (of heart). And within a short time Yudhishthira, the son of Kunti, by his good behaviour, manners and close application to business, overshadowed the deeds of his father.
Analysis: This proves that a year passed by after Arjuna defeated Drupada. So i assume that they're entering adulthood now.

        • How much time passed by during the stay at lac house
Quote:
'Seeing the Pandavas living there cheerfully and without suspicion for a full year, Purochana became exceedingly glad. And beholding Purochana so very glad, Yudhishthira, the virtuous son of Kunti, addressing Bhima and Arjuna and the twins (Nakula and Sahadeva) said, 'The cruel-hearted wretch hath been well-deceived. I think the time is come for our escape. Setting fire to the arsenal and burning Purochana to death and letting his body lie here, let us, six persons, fly hence unobserved by all!'
Analysis: Over here Arjuna's name is clearly mentioned. It is said that they all lived their (in Varanvata's house of lac) for at-least a year. And their would have also been at the very least another year for the conquests of Bhima & Arjuna (that they did after the Drupada incident) and one more year after their higher education with Balarama and Drona. So a year after the Drupada incident, another year of higher education, and one more year for the conquest, a last year for the Varnavata saga. Four (4) years had passed by after the Drupada incident, Arjuna would have to be an adult by now.

      • How much time passed by for Ghatotkacha to be born (their is no way he was born in just a day)
          • Hidimva's request
Quote:
O illustrious dame, unite me with this thy son, my husband. Endued as he is with the form of a celestial, let me go taking him with me wherever I like. Trust me, O blessed lady, I will again bring him back unto you all. When you think of me I will come to you immediately and convey you whithersoever ye may command. I will rescue you from all dangers and carry you across inaccessible and uneven regions. I will carry you on my back whenever ye desire to proceed with swiftness. O, be gracious unto me and make Bhima accept me.
Analysis: Hidimva made a proposal in-front of Kunti and said she would do so and so for the Pandavas and her. She couldn't have done all of these things in one day (especially considering her intercourse with Bhima).

          • Yudhishthira's statement
Quote:
Yudhishthira said. 'It is even so, O Hidimva, as thou sayest. There is no doubt of it. But, O thou of slender waist, thou must act even as thou hast said. Bhima will, after he hath washed himself and said his prayers and performed the usual propitiatory rites, pay his attentions to thee till the sun sets. Sport thou with him as thou p. 324 likest during the day, O thou that art endued with the speed of the mind! But thou must bring back Bhimasena hither every day at nightfall.'
Analysis: Notice that Yudhishthira said every day. Key word "every" that means it was at-least more than one, right?! Yudhishthira also talked about some marriage rites and the prayers of Bhima. So all of these things could not have happened in one day.

          • Bhima's demands
Quote:
'Then Bhima, expressing his assent to all that Yudhishthira said, addressed Hidimva, saying, 'Listen to me, O Rakshasa woman! Truly do I make this engagement with thee that I will stay with thee, O thou of slender waist, until thou obtainest a son.' Then Hidimva, saying, 'So be it,' took Bhima upon her body and sped through the sides.
Analysis: Bhima clearly said he will keep staying with Hidimva until she gives birth to a son. So he'll leave her then. And a child takes at-least nine months to be born.

          • Vaisampayana's description
Quote:
On mountain peaks of picturesque scenery and regions sacred to the gods, abounding with dappled herds and echoing with the melodies of feathered tribes, herself assuming the handsomest form decked with every ornament and pouring forth at times mellifluous strains. Hidimva sported with the Pandava and studied to make him happy. So also, in inaccessible regions of forests, and on mountain-breasts overgrown with blossoming trees on lakes resplendent with lotuses and lilies, islands of rivers and their pebbly banks, on sylvan streams with beautiful banks and mountain-currents, in picturesque woods with blossoming trees and creepers in Himalayan bowers, and various caves, on crystal pools smiling with lotuses, on sea-shores shining with gold and pearls, in beautiful towns and fine gardens, in woods sacred to the gods and on hill-sides, in the regions of Guhyakas and ascetics, on the banks of Manasarovara abounding with fruits and flowers of every season Hidimva, assuming the handsomest form, sported with Bhima and studied to make him happy. Endued with the speed of the mind, she sported with Bhima in all these regions, till in time, she conceived and brought forth a mighty son begotten upon her by the Pandava. Of terrible eyes and large mouth and straight arrowy ears, the child was terrible to behold. Of lips brown as copper and sharp teeth and loud roar, of mighty arms and great strength and excessive prowess, this child became a mighty bowman. Of long nose, broad chest, frightfully swelling calves, celerity of motion and excessive strength, he had nothing human in his countenance, though born of man. And he excelled (in strength and prowess) all Pisachas and kindred tribes as well as all Rakshasas. And, O monarch, though a little child, he grew up a youth the very hour he was born. The mighty hero soon acquired high proficiency in the use of all weapons. The Rakshasa women bring forth the very day they conceive, and capable of assuming any forms at will, they always change their forms. And the bald-headed child, that mighty bowman, soon after his birth, bowing down to his mother, touched her feet and the feet also of his father. His parents then bestowed upon him a name. His mother having remarked that his head was (bald) like unto a Ghata (water-pot), both his parents thereupon called him Ghatotkacha (the pot-headed). And Ghatotkacha who was exceedingly devoted to the Pandavas, became a great favourite with them, indeed almost one of them.
Analysis: Now please tell me how could Ghatotkaca have become a favorite of the Pandavas in under a day? This clearly means the Pandavas had to have spent at-least a year with the Rakshasas (not a day). They waited for Ghatotkaca's birth and then spent a few more months with him in his infant stage. How could Ghatotkaca have become such a great bowman in a few months or a day though? All of the things described in the text above could not have happened in a single day. During this chapter the dart of Indra (given to Karna) was also described. So perhaps this quote is just attempting to summarize what will happen in the future of Ghatotkaca's life. Regardless the Pandavas had to have spent at the very least one year with Ghatotkaca. Maybe two years. And please do note that if we believe that Krishna was of the same generation of the Pandavas then since Krishna was already a grandfather by the time of the Swayamvara Parva (father if we talk about BORI Mahabharata since Aniruddha's presence is removed in the Swayamvara of BORI) that means that the Pandavas were very old during that time not that they were very young compared to Krishna. The Pandavas might have been very old. And this may have been because of the amount of time they spent with Ghatotkaca. It's worth looking into.

      • After Ghatotkaca's birth
    • How much time flew by
Quote:
Those mighty car-warriors, the heroic Pandavas, then went, O king, from forest to forest killing deer and many animals (for their food). And in the course of their wanderings they saw the countries of the Matsyas, the Trigartas, the Panchalas and then of the Kichakas, and also many beautiful woods and lakes therein. And they all had matted locks on their heads and were attired in barks of trees and the skins of animals. Indeed, with Kunti in their company those illustrious heroes were attired in the garbs of ascetics. And those mighty car-warriors sometimes proceeded in haste, carrying their mother on their backs; and sometimes they proceeded in disguise, and sometimes again with great celerity. And they used to study the Rik and the other Vedas and also all the Vedangas as well as the sciences of morals and politics.
Analysis: Now do try to understand how long, what amount of time it would take to cover such distances? To travel in great countries of north India from place to place. Add that to the time it would take them to study more political science and morality. Studying, hunting (they were not begging for alms at this point of their exile), traveling and wandering. Perhaps another year? Nonetheless the five brothers should still be in their twenties. With Yudhishthira in his late twenties getting close to thirty years of age.

      • When Arjuna won Draupadi
        • Fool Karna's opinion of the Pandavas age
Quote:
Karna said, 'It doth not seem to me, O Duryodhana, that thy reasoning is well-founded. O perpetuator of the Kuru race, no method will succeed against the Pandavas. O brave prince, thou hast before, by various subtle means, striven to carry out thy wishes. But ever hast thou failed to slay thy foes. They were then living near thee, O king! They were then unfledged and of tender years, but thou couldst not injure them then. They are now living at a distance, grown up, full-fledged. The sons of Kunti, O thou of firm resolution, cannot now be injured by any subtle contrivances of thine. This is my opinion.
Analysis: As per fool karna's opinion the Pandavas (prior to Varnavrata) were mere children/teens and very young, but now after Draupadi Swayamvara they are fully grown adults.

    • Time in-between Tirtha Yatra & (and) Swayamvara.
      • How much time did the Pandavas take to build Khandavaprastha?
Quote:
And content with half the kingdom, they removed to Khandavaprastha, which was in unreclaimed desert. Then those heroes of unfading splendour, viz., the Pandavas, with Krishna at their head, arriving there, beautified the place and made it a second heaven. And those mighty car-warriors, selecting with Dwaipayana's assistance a sacred and auspicious region, performed certain propitiatory ceremonies and measured out a piece of land for their city. Then surrounded by a trench wide as the sea and by walls reaching high up to the heavens and white as the fleecy clouds or the rays of the moon, that foremost of cities looked resplendent like Bhogavati (the capital of the nether kingdom) decked with the Nagas. And it stood adorned with palatial mansions and numerous gates, each furnished with a couple of panels resembling the out-stretched wings of Garuda. And it was protected with gateways looking like the clouds and high as the Mandara mountains. And well-furnished with numerous weapons of attack the missiles of the foes could not make slightest impression on them. And they were almost covered with darts and other missiles like double-tongued snakes. The turrets along the walls were filled with armed men in course of training; and the walls were lined with numerous warriors along their whole length. And there were thousands of sharp hooks
and Sataghnis (machines slaying a century of warriors) and numerous other machines on the battlements. There were also large iron wheels planted on them. And with all these was that foremost of cities adorned. The streets were all wide and laid out excellently; and there was no fear in them of accident. And decked with innumerable mansions, the city became like unto Amaravati and came to be called Indraprastha (like unto Indra's city). In a delightful and auspicious part of the city rose the palace of the Pandavas filled with every kind of wealth and like unto the mansion of the celestial treasurer (Kuvera) himself.
Analysis: Judging by (from) the description of Vasiampayana it would have taken a long time to build such a city and add so many specific details like this over here. It would have taken a few months at the very least. A barren waste land doesn't turn into a utopia in a day. So i say at-least one year would be a good estimate.

      • How much time till Arjuna goes on a twelve year exile (Arjuna-Vanavasa/Tirtha-yatra)
        • Before the Pandavas listen to the story of Tilottama and make a vow
Quote:
Those scorchers of foes, the Pandavas, having obtained their kingdom, at the command of Dhritarashtra, passed their days in joy and happiness at Khandavaprastha with Krishna. And Yudhishthira. endued with great energy and ever adhering to truth, having obtained the sovereignty, virtuously ruled the land, assisted by his brothers. And the sons of Pandu, endued with great wisdom and devoted to truth and virtue, having vanquished all their foes, continued to live there in great happiness. And those bulls among men, seated on royal seats of great value, used to discharge all the duties of government.
Analysis: This means Arjuna had to have helped alot with running the kingdom and governing it before the vow happened. The time is something i cannot estimate over here. Perhaps just days as the text says?

      • Last passage before the exile
Quote:
The Pandavas, having established such a rule, continued to reside there. By the prowess of their arms they brought many kings under their sway. And Krishna became obedient unto all the five sons of Pritha, those lions among men, of immeasurable energy. Like the river Saraswati decked with elephants, which again take pleasure in that stream, Draupadi took great delight in her five heroic husbands and they too took delight in her. And in consequence of the illustrious Pandavas being exceedingly virtuous in their practice, the whole race of Kurus, free from sin, and happy, grew in prosperity.
Analysis: Since the text says that the Pandavas did some further conquests and had even more battles perhaps they would have spent another year prior to the exile. Maybe Arjuna/Pandavas had intercourse with Draupadi before the exile of Arjuna.

Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01216.htm
      • Let me just use common sense for this. I will not need any quotes since i have already provided quotes in this post that prove the facts that tirtha yatra was 12 years long and Go Harana happened 65 years after Khandava Daha. While Khandava daha occurred 15 years after tirtha yatra. 27 plus 65 equals 92.
        • Arjuna was born 2 and a half years after Yudhishthira. 
          • Because Yudhishthira took 9 months to be born, Bima also took 9 months to be born. But Arjuna took 21 months (12 plus 9) to be born. All in all 30 months difference in the age of Yudisthira and Arjuna.
            • So the statement that their age difference was each a year is not credible. Either Kunti's tapasya is a later addition or the statement is.
        • Arjuna (at Virata Parva) was 119 years old
          • He was 27 right before his 12 year exile
          • He came back to Indrarastha when he was 39 years of age 
          • Then 15 more years passed by until Khandava-daha (where he gets his signature Gandiva bow). So that makes him 54 years old.
          • 65 more years go by as Arjuna said he had the Gandiva for 65 years up until that point in time.
            • 65 plus (+) 54 = (equals) 119 logically.
        • Arjuna was 22 during the fire at Varnavrata (house of lac).
          • Arjuna spent two more years with Ghatotkaca
          • Arjuna spent another year travelling to different countries and hunting with his brothers.
          • Arjuna spent a year living with his in-laws at Pancala. Now he's 26 years old.
    • Now if we assume that Arjuna had a child with Draupadi prior to the exile then these are how the factors would end up.
      • Arjuna's age during Khandava-daha
        • Arjuna only had 3 years of marital life with Droupadi before the exile. So it's safe to say they had intercourse during that time. 12 years later their son would be 14 years old (9 months pregnancy leads to him being 14 instead of 15).
          • So since his child is already close to 15 that means he is already old enough to partake in military training under him. So taht would mean Arjuna is younger if we consider this theory. He is still 39-40 years old instead of 54 years old.
            • He would be 39 years old when he comes back from his exile but 40 years old during Khandava-daha.
      • Arjuna's age during Virata Parva
        • 65 years passed by after the khandava-daha forest burning incident.
          • So that makes Arjuna 105 years old.
            • Because 65 + 40 is equivalent to 105.
    • We should not take the Mahabharata Chronology on sacred-texts.com to be a credible source for ranking the age of Mahabharata characters.


Conclusions (what the heck we learned):

  1. Virata Parva occurred 65 years after Khandava-Daha did.
  2. Kauravas became husbands and fathers long before the Pandavas did. Before Bhima too.
  3. Sakuni was younger than Vidura.
  4. Arjuna's tirtha-yatra was not 12 months or 12 seasons but 12 years.
  5. Khandava-Daha incident happened 15 years after the tirtha yatra of Arjuna. Unless Arjuna had intercourse with Droupadi before his exile.
  6. Arjuna was born 2 and a half years after Yudhishthira.
  7. Bhima was born exactly after Yudhishthira. No tapasya was done for Bima.
  8. Krishna was already a father while the Pandavas were still bachelors.
  9. Arjuna was two and a half years younger to Yudhishthira. But 1 and three fourths of a year younger than Bhima.
    1. Because it is a year of tapasya and 9 months of pregnancy.
  10. Nakula & Sahadeva were of the same age. They were twins, they were born at the same time, neither of them was older or younger than the other
  11. Their is no information on how much time passed by between Pandu's death and completion of the education of Kuru princes.
  12. Pandavas and Kauravas were teenagers during the Tournament, Karna was a adult.
  13. After the guru dakshina incident of Drupada's defeat a year passed by and Yudhishthira was corona-ted as the heir to the throne.
  14. Sakuni's statement to Yudhishthira (in Sabha Parva) should not be taken seriously or literally because he was talking about Yudhishthira being older than Duryodhana and the Kouravas not himself (Sakuni). And he said since Yudhishthira is a king he is superior to Sakuni (who is a prince).
  15. In between Drupada's defeat and the house of lac burning 4 years had been crossed.
  16. The Pandavas were in disguise (after Varnavata) for 4 years.
  17. The Pandavas spent 2 years with Hidimva (1 year was with Ghatotkaca cause he took nine months to be born).
  18. Pandavas did not grow into real men until the Swayamvara Parva, before that they were not adults but just little kids.

Friday, March 2, 2018

Arjuna's chariot blasting is an interpolation.

The famous blasting of Arjuna's chariot is a later addition to the epic Mahabharata.
And i will prove why this is the truth.
  • Incidents in Mahabharata that contradict this incident.
    • Parasurama's curse for the Brahmastra's of brave Karna.
      • Also then the curse of Karna is rendered invalid if this event happened. Because karna used brahmastra? Lmaooo what about the curse of Rama? Are the words of Karna's guru false? 
Quote:
'Without much minding Dhritarashtra, the son of Vichitravirya who was about to ask of Partha, Karna said unto Dhritarashtra's son these words, cheering up the spirit of the assembled Kurus, 'Coming to know of the false pretence under which I obtained the Brahma weapon of old from Rama, the latter told me,--When thy hour will come thy memory will fail thee in respect of this weapon. Even for so great an offence I was cursed so lightly by that great Rishi, my preceptor. That great Rishi of fierce energy is capable of consuming even the entire Earth with her seas. By attention and personal bravery, I appeased his heart. I have that weapon with me still, and my period is not yet run. I am, therefore, fully competent (to win victory) Let the responsibility be mine.
Analysis: Karna's guru said that the Brahmastra will fail him in his time of need, when his last hour arrives. So how could this Brahmastra possibly have been able to destroy the chariot of a warrior like Arjuna. Why are Karna fans braying with this type of contradictory logic?

    • Arjuna not being on his chariot during the 3rd day.
Quote:
Meanwhile, jumping down from his car, Partha, himself of massive and long arms, quickly ran on foot after that chief of Yadu's race possessed of massive and long arms, and seized him by his two hands.
Analysis: The text clearly says that Arjuna jumped down from his car and wasn't their. Where was it blasted? Was Bhishma's Brahmastra weak?

    • Arjuna being off his chariot on the 9th day.
Quote:
Meanwhile, the mighty-armed Partha. quickly following Kesava behind, seized him by encircling him with his two arms. That best of male beings, viz., Krishna, of eyes like lotus petals, seized by Partha, still proceeded with great speed, bearing the latter away with him. The mighty Partha, that slayer of hostile heroes, however, forcibly catching hold of his legs, stopped Hrishikesa with great difficulty at the tenth step.
Analysis: Six days later Bhishma (the man that defeated Karnas guru Parasurama) had another opportunity but his Brahmastra proved to be useless. The text clearly says that Arjuna and Krishna were not on the chariot at that time. Krishna had taken off from their and gotten to the ground Arjuna had to seize a person on the ground on foot.

    • Arjuna not being on his chariot during the 14th day to fight Kuru warriors. His horses were being fed water by Krishna.
Quote:
Although staying on the ground, and alone, he succeeded yet in baffling all those kings on their cars, like that one fault, avarice, destroying a host of accomplishments. The Kauravas, O king, applauded the highly wonderful prowess of Partha as also of Vasudeva, saying, 'What more wonderful incident hath ever taken place in this world, or will ever take place than this, viz., that Partha and Govinda, in course of battle, have unyoked their steeds? Displaying fierce energy on the field of battle and the greatest assurance, those best of men have inspired us with great thoughts.' Then Hrishikesa, of eyes like lotus-petals, smiling with the coolest assurance, as if, O Bharata, he was in the midst of an assembly of women (and not armed foes), after Arjuna had created in the field of battle that hall, made of arrows, led the steeds into it, in the very sight.
Analysis: Arjuna was fighting on foot. He was not on his chariot yet his chariot never blasted.

    • Arjuna not being on his chariot during the 15th day to calm down Bhima.
Quote:
Arjuna and Vasudeva, both endued with great splendour, quickly alighting from their car, ran towards Bhima. Those two mighty men, diving into that energy born of the might of Aswatthaman's weapon, had resorted to the power of illusion. The fire of that weapon consumed them not, in consequence of their having laid aside their weapons, as also in consequence of the force of the Varuna weapon, and owing also to the energy possessed by themselves. Then Nara and Narayana, for the pacification of Narayana weapon, began p. 473 forcibly to drag Bhima and all his weapons.
Analysis: Arjuna was clearly not on his chariot when he dragged Bhima out of his chariot. So why didn't it blast? By this time Drona is dead so he already let loose his astras at Arjuna's chariot. nothing happened to the chariot.

    • Arjuna not being on his chariot on the 17th day (to meet Yudhishthira).
Quote:
Then those two foremost of men, (Krishna and Arjuna), proceeding on their car, approached the king who was lying alone on his bed. Both of them, alighting from that car, worshipped the feet of king Yudhishthira the just. Beholding that bull of tigers among men safe and sound, the two Krishnas became filled with joy, like the twin Ashvinis on seeing Vasava.
Analysis: Krishna and Arjuna jumped off their car. It is clearly stated in the text above that they left the chariot. It never exploded. Tsk tsk.

    • Arjuna not being on his chariot during the 18th day (after the death of Karna).
Quote:
O monarch, Kunti's brave son, the lord Yudhishthira, proceeded towards Samantapanchaka. King Duryodhana also, taking up his gigantic mace, wrathfully proceeded on foot with the Pandavas. While proceeding thus, armed with mace and clad in armour, the celestials in the welkin applauded him, saying, "Excellent, Excellent!"
Analysis: Arjuna was walking together with Duryodhana on the ground to witness the final encounter. This was after Karna died. Arjuna was not on his chariot. No burst no blast lol. Arjuna is among the Pandavas.

  • Presence of Arjuna's chariot later on after the blasting.
Quote:
Then those two, viz., Krishna and the son of Pandu, ascended their car and proceeded on the journey, the loving friends engaged the while in delightful conversation. Unto Vasudeva seated on the car, Dhananjaya of great energy once more said these words, O chief of Bharata's race!
Analysis: The blasting was depicted in book 9 but over here in a quote from book 14 Arjuna still has the same chariot.

Conclusion: karna was killed fairly Arjuna's chariot never burs-ted, these facts cannot be denied, get over it.
Quote:
After the high-souled Lord of all creatures had dismounted from that car, the celestial Ape that topped the mantle of Arjuna's vehicle, disappeared there and then. The top of the vehicle, which had before been burnt by Drona and Karna with their celestial weapons, quickly blazed forth to ashes, O king, without any visible fire having been in sight.
Analysis:
The text (of Shalya Parva section 62) says only the "top" of the vehicle was burnt, that is no big achievement at all. So even if it is not an interpolation then it is no mean feat, nothing to brag about and in no way a evidence for Karna's superiority.
Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m09/m09062.htm Such a magical incident defies logic and would not be present in a writing dedicated towards sacred history, where something can burn magically and disappear magically etc.

Monday, February 5, 2018

Battle records of Yuyudhana Satyaki vs Suta Karna according to BORI Mahabharata

Satyaki vs Karna according to Bori Mahabharata.
Since many people have doubts about Satyaki's capability's and use Bori Mahabharata as an excuse making statements like it removed all of Satyaki's achievements etc, i am going to make this post with proof and screenshots from the text of Bori Mahabharata. This will prove the skills of Satyaki and the fact that Bori did not make itself an anti Satyaki Mahabharata. I will only provide proof from Bori.
  • Satyaki vs Karna (according to Bori)
    • 1st instance (11th day)
Screenshot
Analysis 
Drona clearly told everyone on his side including Karna to stop fleeing the battlefield. The only person in the Kourava army that was still their was Drona. Over here Karna is mentioned along with Satyaki. So he had to have fought with him. It is written in the text that the warriors fought to kill each other. Even while seeking to kill his opponent still Karna fled and Satyaki won.
    • 2nd instance (12th day)
      • 1st fight 
Screenshot
Analysis
Karna was not outnumbered as many Karna fans claim. Karna actually had a huge team supporting him. 15 warriors protecting his flank and 3 of his brothers supporting him along with the Nishadas. So in actuality in terms of numbers it was Karna's team who had the numerical advantage.
Karna failed to pierce or wound any of his opponents. He only cut off their weapons. Yet all of his opponents (including Satyaki who we are talking about) injured him here. Three arrows of Satyaki assailed Karna's body.
      • 2nd fight
Screenshot
Analysis:
The argument that Karna was outnumbered is foolish here. Karna had the support of twenty other warriors (they were all killed) but still Karna couldn't handle even 4 warriors (Satyaki, Bhima, Dhrishtadyumna, Arjuna)? Satyaki not only cut off Karna's bow but he also pierced Karna's body and bathed him in blood here. Karna also had to be rescued by who? By Drona, Jayadratha & Duryodhana. Satyaki being protected by other Pandava warriors was stated later on in the text after Karna was defeated.
    • 3rd instance (14th day)
      • 1st fight
Screenshot
Analysis
Satyaki and Karna were fighting a one on one battle, over here i did not find that Satyaki had any unfair advantage, Satyaki did not use any dirty tricks. Another argument would be that Karna was badly wounded and exhausted after his battles against Bheema & Arjuna so that is why he failed against Satyaki. Kritavarman, Drona, Vikarna, Duryodhana, Sudarsana, Duhsasana, Jalasandha, Bhurishravas etc all of these people were fought by Satyaki before he fought Karna that day. So Satyaki would be without a doubt out of stamina way more than Karna. Satyaki was more exhausted and Karna wasn't! Karna made no promise to Satyaki's mother that he would spare him yet Karna was defeated, why? Karna could not save his new charioteer and new horses from Satyaki's lethal arrows. What a pathetic warrior, what a pathetic archer.
      • 2nd fight
Screenshot
Analysis
Karna made many strong efforts for killing Satyaki but he had failed miserably. Karna and his gang surrounded Satyaki encircling him from all sides yet the mighty-armed Satyaki destroys Karna's circle of warriors defeats him and spares his life. Karna is now indebted to Satyaki. It was never stated anywhere that Satyaki's chariot gave him a advantage.
    • 4th instance (14th night)
      • 1st encounter
Screenshot
Analysis
It was stated over here that Karna fled. Dhritarashtra himself said they were agitated by Pandava warriors. He also said that warriors on his side were blinded and shattered by darkness. Even though Karna is supposedly the son of Surya (the god of the sun/light) he was agitated by darkness. He was among the Kourava army at that time. He is mentioned along with Satyaki in the same line. Indirectly Dhritarashtra said Karna was being defeated.
      • 2nd encounter
Screenshot
Analysis
Satyaki cuts Karna's arrows and wounds him, the narrator tries to say the battle is equal but the fact that Karna's son had to save him proves that it was not. Satyaki clearly defeated Karna here. Also the fact that Satyaki asked Karna to wait and not run away is proof that prior to this incident Karna ran away from Satyaki in a fight before this. Vrishasena (the armored son of Karna) had to rescue Karna by interfering in the battle. This proves that Satyaki had the upperhand, if not a victory then Satyaki deserves credit for this performance.
      • 3rd encounter
Screenshot
Analysis
Over here it was both father and son (Karna and Vrishasena) fighting Satyaki together. Proving that alone they would never have been able to stand a chance against Satyaki. Satyaki was able to cut off the bows and arm-guards of his opponents. But did Karna & Vrishasena ever achieve such a feat in this fight? No. Also after this incident Karna suggests a group attack on Satyaki (indirectly admitting that Satyaki is victorious and Karna has been defeated). Another victory for Satyaki.
      • 4th encounter
Screenshot
Analysis
Over here Krishna was stating facts. He said that Satyaki was being shattered by the arrows of Karna. And that Arjuna should go over their in that direction to kill Karna. But this is very contradictory as Karna still possesses the Vasavi dart with him, and Ghatotkaca is still alive. So why would Krishna say these things? Maybe this incident is an interpolation to glorify Karna.
      • 5th encounter
Screenshot 1
Screenshot 2
Analysis
The battle was not over just yet, the rest of it was skipped and not narrated. All Karna did was make Satyaki tremble. How is that a victory? The fight continued and it was stated that all their bows could be seen drawn to circles. This suggests the fight was still taking place and going on. And Satyaki was not a king. So clearly Karna did not drive him away
      • 5th instance (15th day)
        • 1st fight 
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    This incident seems like blood cancer for Karna fans. They made claims like this incident was removed by BORI but fortunately the truth is here! Satyaki checks Drona, Kripa & the useless suta Karna. Arjuna and Krishna also stated that Satyaki was toying with his opponents and had the upper hand. Now over here he had no special chariot and Karna has no special handicap.
      • 6th instance (16th day)
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Now the argument that several warriors group attacked Karna is stupid. group attacks were common and prior to this fight Satyaki was having a lone match against Karna yet Karna had to be rescued by a team of atirathis.
      • 7th instance (17th day)
        • 1st fight
    Screenshot 1
    Screenshot 2
    Analysis
    This is more proof that Satyaki is winning. It was a group attack on Karna yes. But Karna had the Vijaya bow over here, Salya as a driver, and celestial chariot. The asura Naraka was also possessing him. So Karna should have been able to fight the very best he could possibly fight. But no! Still Karna was defeated and got rescued by his sons. Karna was useless. The second screenshot clearly says Wishing to save their father, the strikers who were Karna's sons, so don't speak to me about Karna being a better warrior than Satyaki.
        • 2nd fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here in this fight their was no real result. It was still continuing and going on. Karna was protected by all the soldiers in Dhritarashtra's army while Satyaki had the support of the Pandavas & Shikhandi.
        • 3rd fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here Karna actually won his fight. He defeated Satyaki, he had the upperhand on him. But this defeat can be dismissed as a battle on unequal footings. As Karna had the support of an asura named Naraka (who possessed him on the last day of his life). The support of a driver superior to Krishna (Salya) and the protection of his sons, he had better technology than Satyaki, (the vijaya bow) that is why he won. It was an unfair war lol. Coward Karna never wins on his own merit.
        • 4th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    The result of this fight? A stalemate. No one side was proving better than the other. So Karna and Satyaki were equals over here. This encounter was a draw.
        • 5th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here this incident can also be seen as Karna running away from Satyaki. The text says he defeated Satyaki yet Satyaki continued to pursue Karna from behind? Is it not odd? If that was the case then why did Karna not continue to fight with Satyaki to finally kill him or defeat him once and for all. Why did he allow Satyaki to keep following him, and why did he avoid a fight with Satyaki? Why would Karna try to fight Pancalas (warriors weaker than Satyaki)? Because Karna realized he can never defeat Satyaki probably.
        • 6th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here Satyaki and Karna had another stalemate their fight ended with no result. Although this was the mercy of Karna's technology and the possession of Naraka.
        • 7th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis 
    Over here all that is stated is that Karna countered all of them, he matched his opponents move for move. This is not a defeat or victory for anyone.
        • 8th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Krishna compared Karna to Indra over here and claimed that Karna was defeating all the great warriors of the Pandava army. So i will count this as a defeat of Satyaki. But just no that it was because of unequal footings. 
        • 9th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here again it is said that people who are wishing to serve Satyaki are losing to Karna. But this is not said to be a group attack. So this cannot be declared a defeat either because the servants of Satyaki are mentioned not Satyaki himself. This was not even a fight between them.
        • 10th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here Karna had the upper hand, he managed to cut off the bow of Satyaki. Not only did he cut off Satyaki's bow, he also performed these feats while fighting Bima at the same time! This is another defeat of Satyaki (only on the 17th day).
        • 11th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here their was another draw. No result was shown. Karna killed Satyaki's horses. Karna wanted to kill Satyaki but he (Karna) still failed to kill Satyaki. He couldn't do anything. He attacks helpless animals (horses) whoa re defenseless instead of fighting a brave man like Satyaki. The son of Karna Sushena was slain by Satyaki's well-shot arrows. Karna was senseless with rage but yet his weapons were countered by a eunuch like Srikandi!
        • 12th fight
    Screenshot
    Analysis
    Over here Karna has the help of Kripa, Bhoja, and sons of Dhritarashtra. Yet despite all of these noticeable facts he was beaten by Satyaki over here. Satyaki became invincible and defeating Satyaki became a dream for Karna. I've heard rumors that Krishna gave Satyaki a boon of invincibility. But their is no proof for this claim.

    Conclusions:
    How many times did Satyaki defeat Karna? (All of these incidents are included in BORI CE and have been proved with the help of screenshots).
    1. 11th day
      1. Satyaki fights Karna for the first time ever and Drona tells him to stop fleeing. Meaning Karna ran away during this first fight.
    2. 12th day
      1. Satyaki defeats Karna and wounds his body with over sixty arrows, so Karna needs a rescue team to save him.
    3. 14th day
      1. Satyaki cuts off Karna's bow, destroys his chariot, kills his horses, slayed his driver, and overall exposes Karna, disrobing Karna in battle again.
    4. 14th day
      1. Karna and seven others can't even take a single car warrior. And they lose to Satyaki. He not only defeats them he also spares Karna's life over here to honor the words of Arjuna.
    5. 14th night
      1. Satyaki fights with Karna and Karna runs away, Dhritarashtra himself admits this).
    6. 14th night
      1. Satyaki fights with karna and defeats him, he is about to humiliate Karna but the latter's son intervenes.
    7. 14th night
      1. Satyaki defeats both Karna and Vrishasena. Karna becomes scared and begs Duryodhana for help.
    8. 15th day
      1. Satyaki (while mild) is able to hold off and check sometimes prevail over three maharathis simultaneously including Karna. After this incident Karna s not mentioned in the text till the death of Drona.
    9. 16th day
      1. Satyaki wounds Karna and has the upper hand on him so Kuru warriors interfere in the fight to save Karna.
    10. 17th day
      1. Group attack on Karna led by Satyaki, Karna is losing so his sons save him.
    11. 17th day
      1. Karna runs away to fight foot soldiers after Satyaki pursues him.
    12. 17th day
      1. Karna's son is killed by Satyaki right infront of his eyes. And Karna fails to kill Satyaki back.
    13. 17th day
      1. Satyaki is ambushed by Karna, Kritavarman, Kripa & Kouravas. Yet Satyaki destroys this circle of warriors and they fail to defeat him.
    How many times did Karna defeat Satyaki?
    1. 12th day
      1. Karna cut off the bow and dart of Satyaki but never wounded Satyaki. The main reason this is declared as a defeat is because Arjuna had to distract Karna to leave Satyaki by killing Karna's foster brothers.
    2. 14th night
      1. One interpolated victory of Karna where Krishna states that Satyaki has been defeated by Karna and is in danger of losing his life.
    3. 16th day
      1. Satyaki's name was not mentioned but it is implied that he was defeated by Karna after because so many warriors attacked Karna and Satyaki had to be a part of this group at the end of that day. Even Duryodhana mentioned one defeat of Satyaki where Karna vanquished him. So it has to have some truth behind it.
    4. 17th day
      1. Karna defeats Satyaki and his group of warriors. But his victory was only due to the fact that he had superior technology and was possessed by an Asura called Naraka.
    5. 17th day
      1. The same incident that is seen as Karna running away from Satyaki can often be seen as Karna defeating Satyaki and going to fight Panchala warriors to defend his army.
        1. He is the chief of the Kuru forces now so he has too many responsibilities on his hand.
      2. Their are two sides to this incident, that's why i can not declare it as a no result or draw/stalemate.
    6. 17th day
      1. Krishna said that Karna was destroying Satyaki over here but this could be an interpolation as it is from the same paragraph in which Krishna says Karna used the Pasupata weapon.
    7. 17th day
      1. Karna cut off the bow of Satyaki and defeated him very badly over here. It was an amazing feat as he did this while having to fight with the mighty Bheema at the same time. Karna was fighting like a cornered cat though.
    Disproving excuses for Karna's defeats
    1. Satyaki did a group attack on Karna
      1. No he didn't
      2. Have you people even read the amount of times that Karna did a group attack on Satyaki? Here is the list.
        1. 12th day
        2. 14th day
        3. 14th night
        4. 14th night
        5. 15th day (with Drona and Kripa at his side)
        6. 17th day
    2. Krishna was in his mind dampening Karna's true capability
      1. That's not what was stated. So stop misinterpreting texts.
      2. The only thing Krishna did is he stopped Karna from throwing the Vasavi dart not anything else.
      3. Krishna only did this during the duels Karna had with Arjuna, not Satyaki and not Bhima.
      4. If this is the case then this only affects Karna till the 14th night. But after the 14th night their are several incidents where Satyaki still disrobes Karna on the battlefield. 
        1. I am going to list them now.
          1. 15th day
          2. 16th day
          3. 17th day
          4. 17th day
    3. Satyaki had a special chariot
      1. First of all it was never stated that Satyaki's chariot gave him any special advantage.
      2. Their have been several times in the Kurukshetra war where he did not have that chariot yet he still made Karna bite the dust. Let me list them out now.
        1. 11th day
        2. 12th day
        3. 14th night
        4. 14th night
        5. 14th night
        6. 15th day
        7. 16th day
        8. 17th day
        9. 17th day
        10. 17th day
      3. People will make the bullshit claim and excuse that Satyaki had a divine chariot to help him, and when you have better technology (than your opponent) then you will win. But that's false, because Satyaki having that divine chariot is not as much of an advantage as Karna having the support of 7 Maharathis (Duhsasana, Duryodhana, Suyodhana, Aswathaman, Kritavarman, Shalya, Vrishasena etc). No matter what the case it was Satyaki versus eight people and yet he was still able to not only pull off such a good performance but also defeat Karna. He spared Karna's life over here.
        1. So it was a unfair battle for Satyaki not Karna. Karna is a cheat.
    4. Karna was not using his Vijaya bow
      1. Yes he actually was using his Vijaya bow (on the 17th day) and yet still he got his arse kicked by Satyaki.
      2. Before the Vijaya bow Karna used a blazing bow during the 11th and 12th days. Satyaki cut it off (thus disarming Karna)
      3. So what? Satyaki had no special bow like the Saranga/Gandiva/Vijaya to help him out. So why does Karna need one?
    Some notable facts
    1. Satyaki spared Karna's life but Karna never spared Satyaki's life
    2. Satyaki is a true full blooded Yadava while Karna is only a half-yadava
    3. Karna's fans always make excuses for his defeats but no one makes and excuse for Satyaki
    4. Satyaki did less group attacks then Karna did. The majority of the group attacks were done by karna.
    5. Satyaki killed a family member of Karna (his son Prasena) but Karna never killed even one family member of Satyaki
    6. Even when karna had the Vijaya bow (17th day) still Satyaki defeated him many times.
    7. Karna's very few amount of victories over Satyaki are questionable (later additions) and due to trivial technicalities at times.
    8. Satyaki defeated Karna more than twice the number of times that Karna defeated Satyaki. So that means for every instance their is a defeat of Sayaki at the hands of Karna, their are at-least two incidents for Karna facing a defeat at the hands of Satyaki.
    9. Satyaki has a good reason to not kill karna, because he wanted to protect the words of Arjuna. But Karna had no excuse for his failure to kill Satyaki. 
      1. Karna made no promise to Satyaki's mother, and Satyaki was not a relative of Karna in any way.
      By the way the warriors often had multiple encounters during the same day that's why when i list out the defeats i state the same day/night as a defeat. Either way Satyaki > Karna. He was the BAAP of Karna.
      So overall the results of the Satyaki vs Karna confrontations remain in Satyaki's favor not Karna's. Satyaki defeated karna more times. Karna defeated Satyaki 7 times, but Satyaki defeated Karna 13 times! Even Krishna has called Satyaki more than a match for Karna and superior during the 14th day. These are all 13 instances where Satyaki fought Karna and performed better than him. And that is proof of his superiority.