Several TV serials, folklore's, fan-fiction novels and books, fan pages show Bhisma as an undefeated warrior of Mahabharata. But that is clearly not the case. If you read the Mahabharata then you will find many incidents where Bhisma has faced defeat. I will use one authentic source only in this post, and that is the Mahabharata.
This analysis will cover bhisma's performance in the kurukshetra war (where his greatest feats are achieved along with his numerous defeats) up until his death.
I am going to try and analyze everysingle line.
So let's get started.
Bhisma's gradebook:
Weighted Grade (how does bhisma stack up against the other general of the kauravas): Better than Shalya, Equal to Karna, Inferior to Aswathama and Drona. I mean Bhisma does not even have knowledge about the chakravyuha. But he did pretty well as a commander in-cheif if you compare him to the others in his job who had to do what he did.
But i have the right to say this now.
I am going to try and analyze everysingle line.
So let's get started.
- Bhishma's encounters during the ten days of the war.
- 1st day)
- Bhisma's first actions
- He fought against Arjuna
Quote:
Grasping a terrible bow, like the staff of death, Shantanu’s son himself advanced against Dhananjaya. Arjuna grasped the bow Gandiva, famous in the world. In the forefront of that battle, the spirited one advanced against Ganga’s son. Those two tigers of the Kuru lineage wished to kill each other. Ganga’s son pierced Partha in that battle, but he did not waver. O king! Pandava did the same to Bhishma, but could not make him waver.
Analysis: They both struck each other but could not make eachother waver.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 43
- Bhisma encounters an army
Quote:
On encountering Bhishma, the army of the Parthas trembled. O bull among the Bharata lineage! The mighty-armed one’s standard was adorned with five stars and a palm tree. It was made out of silver. O king!
Analysis: It just says "army" so no one truly knows what was in the army besides infantry, cavalry, chariots, elephants etc. And it says "trembled" not wounded, injured, killed etc. So no one even died. Also the outcome of the Bhisma vs Arjuna battle seems to be a mystery, maybe they both just chose to avoid each other after exchanging a few blows as they didn't wanna fight each other.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 44
- Bhisma gets protection from the warriors who are under his command
Quote:
Then, urged by your son, Durmukha, Kritavarma, Kripa, Shalya and Vivimshati went to Bhishma and began to protect him. Protected by those five atirathas, the maharatha59 penetrated the Pandava army.
Analysis: How pathetic............. bhisma needs to be protected again... and from what? An army? This proves that instead of encountering other warriors the protection of bhisma was more important, perhaps bhisma was overpowered and in danger? Was Arjuna trying to finish bhisma already? This quote also could be used as proof of bhisma's inferiority to those five warriors, as Bhisma was called maharatha (a warrior inferior to atiratha) while the others who protected him are called atiratha (someone capable of fighting sixty thousand foes simultaenously).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma fails to kill elephants but succeeds in killing humans
Quote:
Bhisma’s palm standard was seen to slice through the Chedis, the Kashis, the Karushas and the Panchalas in diverse ways. Bhishma’s bow and weapons then sliced off the heads60 with extremely forceful, straight-tufted and broadheaded arrows. O bull among the Bharata lineage! As the chariot travelled along its path, Bhishma seemed to be dancing. Some elephants were pierced by him in their vital parts and screamed piteously.
Analysis: Bhisma decapitated a few unknown people, not much of a achievement, that's a common feat. He killed people but not elephants.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma and his group vs Abhimanyu
Quote:
He attacked Bhishma and those supreme charioteers.62 Striking the palm standard with sharp arrows, the brave one fought with Bhishma and his followers. He pierced Kritavarma with one and Shalya with five arrows and weakened his great-grandfather with nine sharp arrows.
Analysis: So bhisma choose the shortcut way, he could not even fight fairly, he could not fight this young man alone one on one. This is disgraceful for him, i wonder how well Parasurama would have fared against Abhimanyu though.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Abhimanyu cuts up bhisma's standard/flag
Quote:
He drew his bow back fully and released an arrow that sliced down the standard embellished with gold.63
Analysis: This is the emblem of the cheif of the Kuru army, and it was cut off so easily by abhimanyu, and what did Bhisma do?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma tries to prove his skills again
Quote:
On seeing the success with which Krishna’s son64 hit the targets, all the charioteers, with Bhishma at the forefront, thought that he possessed the spirit of Dhananjaya himself. His bow twanged like Gandiva and when it was stretched and stretched again in every direction, it seemed to whirl like a circle of fire. Bhishma, the destroyer of enemy heroes, advanced towards him with great speed and in that battle, pierced Arjuna’s son with nine arrows. He used three broad-headed arrows to slice down the standard of the immensely energetic one. Bhishma, rigid in his bows, used three broad-headed arrows to strike his charioteer. O venerable one!
Analysis: "Krishna's" son means Arjuna's son as "Krishna" was also a name of Arjuna, for his dark complexion/skin tone/skin color. Bhisma was able to move with great speed despite being old. But the text just says "strike" the charioteer, he did not slay Abhimanyu's charioteer, if anything bhisma failed to kill the driver of his enemy's chariot.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Abhimanyu overpowers Bhisma
Quote:
Nevertheless, Krishna’s son showered down arrows on those five charioteers. He repulsed their great weapons with showers of arrows. Releasing arrows towards Bhishma, Krishna’s son roared loudly. O king! When he endeavoured thus in battle and released arrows towards Bhishma, his strength of arms was seen to be extremely great. Though he was valorous, Bhishma showered arrows at him. But in that battle, he sliced down all the arrows released from Bhishma’s bow. In that encounter, the brave one used nine invincible arrows to slice down Bhishma’s standard. At this, the people let out a loud shout. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! It65 was made out of silver and was decorated with gold. It was extremely large and bore the mark of a palm. Sliced down by the arrows of Subhadra’s son, it fell down on the ground.
Analysis: Over here Abhimanyu dominated the encounter with Bhisma again despite the fact that he was surrounded and encircled by Bhisma's gang.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Frustrated crook Bhisma resorts to weapons of mass destruction against a young boy.
Quote:
Then, in that extremely terrible moment, the extremely strong Bhishma made many great and celestial weapons manifest themselves. The great-grandfather, immeasurable in his soul, enveloped Subhadra’s son with hundreds and thousands of arrows with drooping tufts. ‘“At this, ten great maharatha archers from the Pandava side swiftly advanced on their chariots, so as to protect Subhadra’s son. O lord of the earth!
Analysis: Yes i agree that ten maharathis had to protect Abhimanyu but does that mean Abhimanyu was beaten? No it does not. Bhisma however was defeated in normal combat by Abhimanyu (considered to be a sixteen year old kid) and now took to his only option to use weapons of mass destruction. Bad points for him. This shows desperation to save his own image and life.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma vs multiple warriors simultaneously
Quote:
When they advanced towards him in battle, Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, pierced Panchala66 with three and Satyaki with sharp arrows. He drew his bow completely back and used a sharp and tufted arrow, like a razor at the tip, to slice down Bhimasena’s standard. O supreme among men! Bhima’s standard was decorated with gold and bore the mark of a lion. Brought down by Bhisma, it fell down from the chariot.
Analysis: The passage above says "when they advanced" so this means that these warriors were only approaching bhisma not attacking him. And karna fans complain about how Arjuna made karna swoon in the Swayamvara Parva because karna was just approaching Arjuna. Well why is it ok for Bhisma to do what Arjuna did and not get any criticism at all? And by the way flags (standards) don't hit back.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma and his gang vs Bhima
Quote:
At this, in that battle, Bhima pierced Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, with three arrows, Kripa with one and Kritavarma with eight.
Analysis: After this sentence the passage of text/section skips to the fight of Uttara and Shalya focusing on them instead. Perhaps bhisma's defeat should be offscreen instead of onscreen?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma attacks Shankha
Quote:
On seeing him advance, with the valour of a crazy elephant, seven of your charioteers surrounded him from every direction,70 wishing to protect the lord of Madra, who seemed to be advancing into the jaws of death. Roaring like thunder, the mighty-armed Bhishma grasped a bow that was as long as a palm tree and attacked Shankha in that battle.
Analysis: He had no business interfering with a man's fight against someone else. Shankha was already surrounded seven warriors other than Shalya, so why did Bhisma have to enter and make it nine vs one? That's just unfair and overkill. And what type of generalissimo choose to focus all of his strength on one target and not portect his amry from many main warrior?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Arjuna fights Bhisma and rescues Shankha
Quote:
Then Arjuna swiftly advanced and placed himself in front of Shankha, so as to protect him from Bhishma and a battle raged between the two. There were great cries and exclamations as the two warriors fought each other in that encounter.
Analysis: Of course Arjuna protected Shankha and then it became a battle just between Arjuna and Bhisma, and it seems to be going pretty even right now. Although i wonder what Abhimanyu and the others were doing at this moment. Where did they go?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma creates carnage among the Pandava army
Quote:
Many shafted arrows were released from Bhishma’s chariot and they covered everything on earth and in the sky. Bhishma, foremost among the wielders of weapons, used his arrows to kill large numbers of Panchalas, Matsyas, Kekayas and Prabhadrakas.
Analysis: All Panchalas matsyas and kekayas were still in great numbers in the pandavas army even at the 18th day, the Prabhadrakas survived till day 17 in huge vast numbers. So bhisma didn't do much, he didn't accomplish anything, the amount of damage is minimum.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma runs away from Arjuna
Quote:
Abandoning the battle with Pandava Savyasachi, he73 rushed towards Panchala Drupada, surrounded by his soldiers.
Analysis: Arjuna defeated Bhisma so easily here. If he wasn't confident that Arjuna was too tough to handle then bhisma would not make Drupad his target instead? DARPOK BHISHM.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma massacres soldiers of Drupada's army
Quote:
He enveloped his beloved relative with many arrows. Like a forest consumed by a fire at the end of winter, Drupada’s soldiers were seen to be consumed by those arrows. Bhishma was stationed in that battle, like a fire without smoke. He was like the sun at midday, scorching with his energy.
Analysis: The "beloved relative" is Drupada. But over here most of Bhisma's victims were soldiers not Drupada. Bhisma couldn't fight Droopad, he could only fight his soldiers. Weak bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Pandavas are scared of Bhisma.
Quote:
The Pandava warriors were incapable of glancing at Bhishma. Oppressed by fear, the Pandavas looked in every direction. But without seeing a protector, they were like cattle afflicted by the cold. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! The soldiers were slaughtered in large numbers and retreated in despondence. The Pandava troops uttered great sounds of lamentation. Shantanu’s son, Bhishma, held a bow that was always drawn in the form of a circle.
Analysis: Yes Pandavas were afraid, for their troops, and upon seeing their grandfather fight this way, but that sign of fear doesn't make them inferior to Bhisma. Most likely they themselves did not even want to wish to even fight him because of their relationships towards him.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Bhisma makes the Pandava army retreat.
Quote:
He released flaming arrows that were like poisonous snakes. Rigid in his vows, he created a continuous stream of arrows in every direction. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! After indicating which one he would target, he killed many Pandava rathas. When the soldiers were crushed and shattered in every way, the sun set and nothing could be seen. O bull among the Bharata lineage! On seeing Bhishma stationed in that great battle, the Parthas withdrew their soldiers.
Analysis: It says that their forces (army retreated) not the parthas (sons of kunti aka pandavas) themselves. Perhaps they did it because it was a sensible policy. But it (the passage of text) says that he shot arrows in "all" directions. This means that he must have attacked the kaurava's army as well. Because they were in one of the directions. So Bhisma killed his own troops.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 45
- Proof that Arjuna was holding back in this fight and chose inaction.
Quote:
This friend of yours74 is alone knowledgeable about all weapons. On seeing us consumed by Bhishma and the great-souled Drona, he looks on with indifference. Bhishma’s divine weapons, and those of the great-souled Drona, are repeatedly consuming all the kshatriyas. O Krishna!
Analysis: Yudhisthira claims Arjuna to be the only one capable of fighting back and countering bhisma. notice when he says he alone is knowledgeable.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 46
- 2nd day)
- Bhisma vs Abhimanyu, Bhima, Virata, Dhristadyumna, Satyaki etc
Quote:
The aged grandfather of the Kurus advanced and showered arrows on those brave men —Subhadra’s son,92 Bhimasena, Shini’s maharatha son,93 Kekaya, Virata, Parshata Dhrishtadyumna and the lords of Chedi and Matsya.
Analysis: It just says that bhisma attacked them and not anything else. Their was no result, no one won and no one lost.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma breaks the Pandavas vyuha
Quote:
At the encounter with that brave one, the great vyuha94 wavered. The battle that was fought by all the soldiers was extremely great.
Analysis: Big deal even karna's vyuhas were destroyed by Satyaki and an even better warrior/general Drona's vyuhas were eradicated by Arjuna, Satyaki, Abhimanyu, Bhima etc.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma leads a group attack on Arjuna
Quote:
Bhishma, the grandfather of the Kouravas, pierced Arjuna with seventyseven iron arrows. O king! Drona pierced him with twenty-five arrows, Kripa with fifty, Duryodhana with sixty-four, Shalya with nine arrows and Vikarna pierced Pandava with ten broad-headed arrows.
Analysis: Bhisma could never face Arjuna like a man! he always tried to cheat and use help of other warriors.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma and his wolf pack fail to hurt Arjuna
Quote:
But though he was struck in every direction with sharp arrows, the mighty-armed and great archer did not suffer and was like a mountain that has been pierced. O bull among the Bharata lineage! Kiriti’s99 soul is beyond measure.
Analysis: Bhisma's circle of "warriors" could not do anything to Arjuna, their attacks were too weak to make him suffer!
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Arjuna counterattacks against Bhisma, Shalya, Kripa, Drona, Vikarna, Suyodhan etc
Quote:
In return, he struck Bhishma with twenty-five arrows, Kripa with nine, Drona, tiger among men, with sixty arrows, Vikarna with three, Artayani100 with three and the king101 with five arrows.
Analysis: As usual Arjuna counter attacks, but no one is defeated this time.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma fails to protect his army from Arjuna
Quote:
Bhishma, best among charioteers, swiftly pierced Pandava with eighty sharp arrows. At this, your warriors were extremely delighted. The powerful Dhananjaya was a lion among charioteers. On hearing these roars of applause, he cheerfully penetrated their midst and having done that, sported with his bow and took aim at those maharathas. Dhananjaya reached the midst of those lions among charioteers. On seeing that his own soldiers were tormented by Partha in that battle, King Duryodhana, lord of men, spoke to Bhishma.
Analysis: Duryodhana gets angry at Bhisma because of this and then starts to criticize bhisma's prowess, it is Bhisma's failure & defeat that Arjuna was able to get through him and get to his comrades to kill them. Arjuna was smart by ducking Bhisma and trolling him by slaying his troops. But yes Arjuna avoided Bhisma but it was a sensible policy, a way of fighting to do the most damage.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Duryodhana exposes Bhisma (because he has not brought them any great victories since the begininng of war).
Quote:
‘O father!104 Pandu’s powerful son is accompanied by Krishna. O Gangeya! He is destroying our soldiers and severing our roots, even though you and Drona, supreme among charioteers, are alive. It is because of you that maharatha Karna has discarded his weapons and does not fight in this battle with Partha, though he always has my welfare in mind. O Gangeya! Act so that Phalguna may be killed.’
Analysis: Arjuna knew what he had to do, now bhima is avoiding attacking the pandavas army and is going after Arjuna himself and Arjuna is massacring the kuru army.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma and Arjuna duke it out
Quote:
In that battle, Gangeya pierced Partha with nine arrows and Arjuna pierced him back with ten arrows that penetrated the inner organs. O Kourava! Arjuna prided himself on his skills in battle. With a thousand well-directed arrows, Pandava enveloped Bhishma in every direction. But Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, repulsed Partha’s net of arrows with his own net of arrows. Both of them were extremely cheerful. Both of them found delight in the battle. They fought against each other, each desiring to counter the other. But neither was superior to the other. The net of arrows released from Bhishma’s bow were seen to be repulsed by Arjuna’s arrows. In that fashion, the nets of arrows released from Arjuna’s bow were all cut down by Gangeya’s arrows and fell down on the ground. Arjuna pierced Bhishma with twenty-five sharp arrows. And in that battle, Bhishma pierced Partha with thirty arrows. Those extremely strong ones wounded each other’s horses, pierced the standards and struck the chariots and wheels of the chariots.
Analysis: A stalemate, but Arjuna showed his firing rate was greater, if bhisma shot nine then arjuna shot ten back, arjuna even shot one thousand arrows so easily in every direction. He was a far faster fighter than Bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma attacks Krishna
Quote:
The destroyers of enemies seemed to be playing. O great king! Bhishma, supreme among the wielders of weapons, was enraged. With three arrows, he pierced Vasudeva between the breasts. O king! Pierced by Bhishma’s arrows, Achyuta Madhusudana was resplendent in that battle, like a blossoming kimshuka.
Analysis: And Krishna was not even described as being hurt by Bhisma's arrows. Why is he so weak that he can't harm even one charioteer?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- A hotheaded Arjuna versus a calm precise Bhisma that wants to kill Arjuna
Quote:
On seeing Madhava thus pierced, Arjuna became extremely angry. In that encounter, he pierced Gangeya’s charioteer with three arrows. In that encounter, the brave ones took aim against each other and endeavoured to kill each other, but did not succeed. The chariots advanced and retreated, traversing wonderful circles. Both charioteers displayed their skill and dexterity in many ways. O king! In seeking their objective, the maharathas repeatedly changed their positions and adopted different paths, so that they could strike each other.
Analysis: After this passage it just talks about them (Bhisma/Arjuna) equalling each others feats in battle so i'm just gonna skip a few paragraphs now.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhisma ambushes Bhima
Quote:
Then the swift and large army of the Kalingas, which had surrounded Bhishma119 in battle, attacked Bhimasena.
Analysis: Such a bad strategy... bhisma was not a good strategist. He should know that you cannot use all your strength against the enemy if you have a hundred people attacking one person (only 6 at most can strike him).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 50
- Bhisma vs Satyaki, Dhrishtadyumna, Bhima
Quote:
Hearing their loud cries in battle, Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, swiftly advanced towards Bhima, surrounded by battle formations and soldiers. ‘“Satyaki, Bhimasena and Parshata Dhrishtadyumna advanced towards Bhishma’s goldembellished chariot. In that encounter, they surrounded Gangeya from all sides and without losing any time, each of them pierced Bhishma with three terrible arrows. But your father Devavrata, the great archer, pierced all of the striving ones back in return, using straighttufted arrows. Having countered those maharathas with thousands of arrows, he used his arrows to kill Bhima’s horses, which were clad in golden armour. Although his horses were slain, the powerful Bhimasena remained stationed on his chariot. He powerfully hurled a spear towards Gangeya’s chariot. But in that battle, before that spear could reach him, your father Devavrata sliced it into three and it fell down on the ground.
Analysis: A similar fight happened on the 12th day with karna, maybe we should comapre his performance to Bhisma's? Well Bhisma clearly performed better than karna did against these three.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 50
- Bhisma runs away from Satyaki
Quote:
Desiring to do that which would bring pleasure to Bhima, Satyaki used his arrows to swiftly bring down the aged Kuru’s charioteer. When his charioteer was killed, Bhishma, supreme among charioteers, was borne away from the field of battle by horses that were as fleet as the wind. O king! When the one who is great in his vows was thus carried away,
Analysis: Over here Satyaki defeated Bhisma. people will say he snuck up on him but the fact is that as a student of Parasurama, Bhisma should have been aware of his surroundings especially considering the fact that he's in a battlefield with millions of troops. Plenty of warriors like Aswathama have fought by driving their horses themselves even the egyptian pharoah ramses has, yet this Bhisma could not do such a thing so i would have to say that forget Satyaki, even Aswathama & Ramses were superior to bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 50
- Huge group attack on Arjuna by Bhisma and Drona
Quote:
On seeing that Subhadra’s son was fighting there, Dhananjaya swiftly advanced there, intending to save his son. With chariots, elephants and horses and with Bhishma and Drona at the forefront, all the kings forcefully attacked Savyasachi.
Analysis: It clearly says that the leaders of all the kings that attacked Arjuna are, Drona & Bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 51
- Arjuna defeated Bhisma
Quote:
There was not a single man in your army who could advance against the brave Arjuna in battle. O lord of the earth! In that encounter, whoever advanced against Partha was pierced by sharp and shafted arrows and conveyed to the world of the dead. When all the warriors on your side were scattered, Arjuna and Vasudeva blew on their supreme conch shells. ‘“On seeing that the army had been shattered in that battle, your father, Devavrata, smiled and told Bharadvaja’s brave son, ‘This brave and powerful son of Pandu is united with Krishna. He is dealing with our soldiers only as Dhananjaya can. No one is capable of vanquishing him in battle today. His form seems to be like that of the destroyer at the end of an era. It is impossible to rally our great army now. Behold. They are looking at each other and are running away. The sun can be seen aloft the supreme mountain Asta.130 It is as if it has robbed the sight of the entire world. O bull among men! I think the time has come for retreat. The warriors are exhausted and frightened and will never fight.’ Having spoken thus to the supreme preceptor Drona, maharatha Bhishma arranged that your army should be withdrawn.
Analysis: It says that no man (was Bhisma even a man?) on the kuru side could advance to fight Arjuna. And that all the warriors of their side were scattered. Bhisma cowardly chose to sound the retreat of his forces. He gave up, he chickened out, he rage quit. Brave guys don't just give up, he enver surrendered before Parasurama.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 51
- 3rd day)
- Pathetic defeat of Bhisma & Drona at the hands of Yudhishthira and Dhrishtadyumna/Drupada (cause of the word "Parshata")
Quote:
In Drona’s sight and in the sight of Gangeya, Parshata, foremost among charioteers, and the Pandava who was Dharma’s son began to slaughter their soldiers with sharp and straighttufted arrows that were capable of killing the enemy. In that battle, the soldiers of your sons started to run away. O lord of the earth! Maharatha Bhishma and Drona were incapable of restraining them, though Bhishma and Drona did try to restrain them. While both Drona and Bhishma looked on, the soldiers fled. Thousands of chariots fled in all directions.
Analysis: Not a good start for the next day of his career. We can understand great warriors like Arjuna, Krishna, Satyaki, Abhimanyu proving their superiority over bhisma, we can even see Bhima proving his superiority. But Dhrishtadyumna? Yudhishthira!?! Also it says "chariots' fled so not just soldiers. Drona & Bhisma were helpless.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 54
- Bhisma slaughters pandava warriors/troops, and sends friendly fire to his own side as well.
Quote:
Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, was there, his bow always stretched in a circle. He released blazing arrows that were like the venom of virulent snakes. Rigid in his vows, he released arrows in all the directions. O bull among the Bharata lineage! He picked out the Pandava charioteers and killed them. With a dextrous hand, he seemed to be dancing around in the chariot. O king! He could be seen everywhere, like a circle of fire.
Analysis: Since the quote says that Bhisma released his arrows in "all" directions, it proves that he also attacked the kaurava army (releasing arrows at them as well). But he also killed alot of Pandava warriors over here.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma appears to be a thousand
Quote:
Though the brave one was alone in that battle, because of his dexterity, the Pandavas and the Srinjayas saw him as many hundreds and thousands. Everyone there thought that Bhishma had used maya on his own self. In one moment, he was seen in the eastern direction. In the next moment, he was seen in the western direction. They saw the lord in the north and immediately saw him in the south. Thus the brave Gangeya was seen in that battle. There was no one among the Pandaveyas who was capable of glancing at him. They only saw many arrows shot from Bhishma’s bow.
Analysis: This technique where a warrior moves that fast to show that he was like hundreds/thousands is interesting, it remonds me of the "afterimage" technique in the famous anime dragon ball z. But it's still sad and pathetic that Bhisma had to resort to that (maya) in order to kill car-warriors. Who cares if the Pandavas were uncapable of looking at him? Not being able to look does not mean not being able to defeat.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma kills one thousand kings
Quote:
Having seen him perform such great feats in the battle there, with the slaughter of the army, the brave ones uttered many lamentations. Your father wandered around in superhuman form and driven by destiny, thousands of kings fell down like insects, led to the fire of the angry Bhishma. In that battle, not a single one of Bhishma’s arrows failed to be successful, because of the large numbers that were arrayed against him, and descended on the bodies of men, elephants and horses. With a single shafted arrow that was released well, he brought down an armoured elephant, like the vajra shattering a mountain.
Analysis: This feat although a great achievement does not mean much. As even Dhrishtadyumna, Satyaki etc have slayed one thousand kings a few times in the war. And killing one elephant is meaningless.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma slaughters Yudhishthirs army
Quote:
With an extremely sharp iron arrow, your father killed two or three elephant-riders, armoured and standing together, at a single stroke. Whoever approached Bhishma, tiger among men, in that battle, was seen to be brought down onto the ground in an instant. Thus, Dharmaraja’s large army was slaughtered through Bhishma’s valour and shattered in a thousand ways. Tormented by the shower of arrows, the large army trembled, while Vasudeva and the great-souled Partha looked on.
Analysis: Yudhishthira always managed to get more soldiers to protect hismelf so this achievement is is irrelevant. And Arjuna was just watching the scene of foot soldiers dying, if Arjuna took action then bhisma would be on the run again.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- All kings of the pandava army run away from bhisma
Quote:
All the kings in Yudhishthira’s army are running away, on having seen Bhishma in battle, with his mouth gaping open. They are frightened and are being destroyed, like small animals by a lion.’
Analysis: Well great warriors like Satyaki, Bhima, Abhimanyu, Dhrishtadyumna, Arjuna etc are not kings, so they were not running away. Only old warriors like Droopad and Virata are kings.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Two bows of Bhisma are cut off by Arjuna
Quote:
Though the horses had been wounded by Bhishma’s arrows, he patiently continued to drive them. Partha picked up his divine bow, with a twang that was like the clap of thunder. He sliced down Bhishma’s bow with three arrows. With his bow sliced down, your father Kouravya again picked up a large bow and strung it in the twinkling of an eye. He drew the bow with his two hands and its twang was like the roar of the clouds. But the enraged Arjuna sliced down that bow too. At this, Shantanu’s son applauded his dexterity. ‘O Partha! O mighty-armed one! O descendant of Pandu! Wonderful. O Dhananjaya! Such a great deed is deserving of you. O son! I am pleased with you. Fight hard with me now.’ Having thus praised Partha and having grasped another large bow, in that battle, the brave one released arrows towards Partha’s chariot.
Analysis: Despite having wounded horses and so many disadvantaged Arjuna was still able to disarm bhisma several times even though he was being mild on Bhisma. Even Bhisma told him to not hold back to stop taking it easy when he said "Fight hard with me now.". Perhaps Bhisma was tryign to distract Arjuna to give himself enough time to pick up another bow.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma wounds Arjuna and krishna on every part of their bodies
Quote:
By driving around in swift circles, he avoided all those arrows. O venerable one! However, with great force, Bhishma used sharp arrows to pierce Vasudeva and Dhananjaya all over their bodies. Thus wounded by Bhishma’s arrows, those two tigers among men were adorned like two roaring bulls, with the scratches of thorns on them. Yet again, extremely angry, Bhishma used straight-tufted arrows to cover the two Krishnas141 on every side. Though enraged, Bhishma repeatedly smiled and used his sharp arrows to make Varshneya tremble and wonder.
Analysis: Despite wounding them on all part of their bodies he was unable to kill any of them, he failed to take their lives, that shows the competence of Bhisma, they just stood their and took the hit because they knew he was weak.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma makes foot soldiers run away
Quote:
The elephants, horses, chariots and standards were shattered and all the warriors were frightened by Bhishma. Yudhishthira’s soldiers were running away.
Analysis: Unfortunately they're not the same foot warriors/soldiers that defeated karna and made him run away.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma ambushes Arjuna and fails
Quote:
Together with Bhishma and Bhurishrava and an army, the lord of the Kouravas150 advanced against him. He held raised arrows in his hand and was like a fire151 that would consume dry wood. Bhurishrava shot seven gold-tufted and broad arrows at Arjuna. Duryodhana hurled an extremely forceful lance, Shalya a club and Shantanu’s son a spear. But he used seven arrows to counter the seven supreme arrows shot by Bhurishrava. With a razor-sharp arrow, he countered the lance that had been released from Duryodhana’s hand. Shantanu’s son had hurled a spear at him, as resplendent as lightning. But as it descended, the brave one used two arrows to cut this down and also the club that had been released from the arms of the king of Madra.
Analysis: Bhisma, Duryodhana and Bhruishravas together could not do anything to Arjuna even though Shalya was on their side.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Arjuna defeats Bhisma, Drona, Suyodhana, Vahlika etc, they all failed to counter his Indrastra
Quote:
The wielder of the Gandiva and Janardana roared in great delight. The Kurus, together with Bhishma, Drona, Duryodhana and Bahlika, saw that Indra’s terrible weapon had extended everywhere and was like the end of a yuga. Their limbs were sorely wounded from the weapon and they saw the sun was withdrawing its rays. They saw that twilight was near and that the sun was streaked with red. They decided to withdraw. Having performed deeds and won fame in the world, Dhananjaya had triumphed over the enemies. Having completed his tasks, together with his brothers, the lord of men retired to his camp for the night.
Analysis: Bhisma's bones (limbs) were described as sorely wounded. Bhisma also (along with others) chose to retreat (withdraw). So this is indeed a defeat.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Bhisma was scared of Arjuna
Quote:
All the warriors and leaders among the Kurus settled down for the night, terrified of Kiriti.
Analysis: Kiriti is another name for Arjuna. Mr. Bhisma, Gangaputra, pitamaha etc FEARED Arjuna!
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- 4th day)
- Bhisma creates a river of blood
Quote:
In that battle, the spirited Bhishma swiftly created a river, with the blood of enemies as the foam. But he avoided Subhadra’s son and attacked maharatha Partha.
Analysis: He still chose to avoid Abhimanyu and fight Arjuna instead.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 56
- Bhisma attacks Bhima but is ambushed by Satyaki who dominated him so Alamvusha has to save Bhisma now
Quote:
“On seeing Vrikodara thus, Bhishma swiftly advanced towards him. He was on a giant chariot with the radiance of the sun and it roared like the clouds. He enveloped everything with a shower of arrows, like clouds showering down rain. On seeing Bhishma advance, like the destroyer with a gaping mouth, the mighty-armed and intolerant Bhima rushed towards him. At that instant, Satyaki, the brave descendant of the Shini lineage, devoted to the truth, attacked the grandfather. He began to kill the enemy with his firm bow and made the soldiers of your son tremble. He was borne on silver steeds and unleashed arrows from his firm bow. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! Among all those on your side, there was no second one capable of withstanding him.176 Alambusa, seated on a supreme king of elephants, pierced him with sharp and terrible arrows.
Analysis: The reason we can say Satyaki defeated Bhisma here but Bhisma did not defeat bhima over here is because bhima and bhisma never fought they jsut rushed at eachother, while bhisma & satyaki on the otherhand did actually fight and despite being outnumbered Satyaki was in control of this fight the whole entire time and got the most success in it. Alambus also rescued Bhisma from the brave Satyaki.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 59
- Bhisma being scared of Ghatotkaca ends the battle of that day early.
Quote:
On seeing that large army, the powerful Indra among the rakshasas let out an extremely loud roar, which was like the sound of thunder. On hearing this roar and on seeing the fighting elephants, Shantanu’s son, Bhishma, spoke to Bharadvaja’s son. ‘I do not wish to fight with Hidimba’s evil-souled son. He is full of strength and valour now and has support. The wielder of the vajra himself is incapable of vanquishing him in battle now. He is certain in his aims and can strike. Our mounts are exhausted and at the end of the day, are wounded and lacerated on account of the Panchalas and the Pandaveyas. Therefore, I do not think that we should fight any more with the victorious Pandavas. Let it be announced that we will withdraw for the day. Tomorrow, we will fight with the enemy again.’
Analysis: He himself stated that he did not want to fight with Ghatotkaca so that is utter cowardice. He also sounded the retreat for the battle of that day very early, this was all out of fearing the enemy. Does it suit bhisma to do this?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 60
- 5th day)
- Bhisma defeats Bhima.
Quote:
The illustrious King Yudhishthira, handsome in his prowess, was himself at the rear, with his two intelligent brothers.210 ‘“The battle commenced with Bhima penetrating the makara’s mouth. He advanced against Bhishma in that encounter and enveloped him with arrows. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! Using great weapons, Bhishma brought these down. In that great battle, he confounded the soldiers of the sons of Pandu, who were stationed in arrays. On seeing that the soldiers were confounded, Dhananjaya swiftly advanced.
Analysis: Their are plenty of people that have done this, kritavarman, Jayadratha, Alamvusha, drona etc all of them succeeded ind efeating four out of the five pandavas. Even Duryodhana did it twice. But the difference is that bhisma had to use strictly weapons (astras) agaisnt Bhima's ordinary arrows to counter them. That puts his performance below Duryodhana's, Jaydratha's, Alamvusha, Kritavarman's etc.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 65
- Arjuna counters Bhisma and wounds him
Quote:
In the forefront of that battle, he pierced Bhishma with one thousand arrows. Having repulsed the weapons that had been released by Bhishma in that encounter, he delighted his own soldiers, who were stationed in battle. At this, King Duryodhana spoke to Bharadvaja’s son.
Analysis: Another encounter where Arjuna dominates the fight and overpowers bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 65
- Bhisma cowardly launches a group attack on bhima
Quote:
In that battle, Drona, Bhishma and Shalya angrily enveloped Bhimasena with arrows.
Analysis: These cowards could not even fight Bhima fairly. They did not have the balls to face him in a one on one fight.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 65
- Bhisma runs away from Sikhandi
Quote:
In the great battle, the great archer, Shikhandi, angrily advanced against the immensely strong Bhishma and Drona, who were causing this torment. The brave and powerful one grasped a bow that had the sound of a cloud. Shikhandi swiftly showered arrows that shrouded the sun. However, on confronting him, the grandfather of the Bharata lineage remembered that he had been a woman earlier and withdrew from the battle.
Analysis: Sikhandi routed Bhisma over here, this was a retreat of Bhisma, he had Drona with him too but Drona did not do anything. Seeing Bhisma repeatedly flee will turn Drona into a road runner also.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 65
- Bhisma fought two or more brothers of arjuna
Quote:
On seeing Bhishma engaged in a fight with his brothers and the other kings, Dhananjaya raised his weapons and rushed against Gangeya.
Analysis: Nothing mentioned about victory or defeat. Even so defeating pandavas who are not Arjuna and a few nameless kings is not impressive as other warriros have already done so.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 67
- Bhisma scared of Arjuna (again)
Quote:
At Panchajanya’s211 roar, Gandiva’s twang and on seeing Partha’s standard, all those on our side were overcome with terror.
Analysis: Why does Bhisma always get scared? Has he not heard the twang of Gandiva before!?!
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 67
- Arjuna dominates the fight with Bhisma
Quote:
With terrible weapons, Dhananjaya advanced against Gangeya. We were confounded by these weapons and could not distinguish between the eastern and the western direction. O bull among the Bharata lineage! Your warriors could not distinguish between the directions. They were overcome with exhaustion. They were bereft of their weapons. They were bereft of their senses. They clung to each other for comfort.
Analysis: Bhisma could not even distinguish from directions (tell which is which). Arjuna even swooned Bhisma over here, because the text states he was bereft of his sense.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 67
- Sikhandi and Virata attack Bhisma
Quote:
With Virata of Matysa, Shikhandi swiftly attacked Bhishma, the mighty archer who was extremely difficult to vanquish.
Analysis: They just attacked him so no one won/lost.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 68
- Bhisma defeats Bhima
Quote:
While all the soldiers looked on, Bhishma, foremost among charioteers, angrily repulsed the immensely strong Bhimasena. In that encounter, the arrows used by Bhishma were goldtufted and sharpened on stone. They were extremely forceful and washed in oil and they wounded Bhima. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! The immensely powerful Bhimasena was enraged. He hurled an extremely powerful javelin that was like a venomous serpent. As that gold-shafted and invincible lance suddenly descended in that encounter, Bhishma sliced it down with straight-tufted arrows. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! After this, using a broad-headed, yellow and sharp arrow, he sliced Bhimasena’s bow into two.
Analysis: Since Bhima did not pick up another bow during the rest of this day (after this incident) and did not fight back against Bhisma we can count this as a defeat of his.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 68
- Bhisma defeats Satyaki
Quote:
At this, Satyaki quickly attacked Bhishma in that battle. O lord of men! He shot many arrows at your father. Bhishma then affixed an extremely terrible and sharp arrow and brought down Varshneya’s219 charioteer from his chariot. O king! When the charioteer of the chariot was slain, the horses fled. They ran hither and thither, with the speed of the mind and the wind. At this, a tumultuous uproar arose from all the soldiers. There were lamentations of woe from those who were on the side of the great-souled Pandavas. ‘Run’, ‘grab the horses’, ‘advance swiftly’—such loud noises followed Yuyudhana’s chariot.220
Analysis: Bhisma copied Satyaki's technique making Satyaki flee like vayu (because that's exactly how Bhisma fled during their previous encounter).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 68
- Bhisma kills Pancala foot soldiers & Somaka foot soldiers
Quote:
While this was going on, Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, began to kill the Pandava soldiers, like the slayer of Vritra against the asuras. When the Panchalas and Somakas were being killed by Bhishma, the noble ones221 resolved to fight and attacked Bhishma.
Analysis: Killing foot soldiers & Rathas is not amazing for a Maharatha.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 68
- Bhisma vs Virata/Virata vs Bhisma
Quote:
With three arrows, Virata pierced maharatha Bhishma. With another three arrows, he pierced the maharatha’s steeds. At this, Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, the great archer, immensely strong and skilled in the use of his hands, used ten gold-tufted arrows to pierce him back in return.
Analysis: No victory or defeat.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 69
- Bhisma is overpowered by Arjuna
Quote:
While that battle raged on, the angry Pandava began to fight with maharatha Bhishma. When the sun had assumed a reddish tinge, Dhananjaya swiftly killed twenty-five thousand maharathas.
Analysis: Bhisma could not stop Arjuna from slaying 25,000 maharathis. He could not give a "uchit uttar" to him. At-least when Karna striked Krishna then Arjuna killed Karna on the seventeenth day, but bhisma can't even kill one supporter of Arjuna. Pathetic warrior.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 70
- 6th day)
- Bhisma with the help of Drona defeats and slays a few foot soldiers
Quote:
Thus slaughtered by Drona and Bhishma, the Srinjayas and the Kekayas were defeated and began to run away.
Analysis: So what? The kekayas did not achieve anything in the war and the Srinjayas lost mainly because Drona bailed bhisma out of this.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 71
- Bhisma kills foot soldiers.
Quote:
In that battle, the powerful Bhishma killed the Pandava soldiers, like a herdsman driving large numbers of animals. O lord of the earth!
Analysis: Not impressive for a warrior of Bhisma's caliber/rank.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 74
- Bhisma kills panchala warriors and then runs away to his own camp
Quote:
Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, was excited with rage. He used straighttufted arrows to slaughter the soldiers of the great-souled ones. He used his arrows to despatch the Panchala soldiers to Yama’s undecaying realm. O king! Having thus shattered the Pandava army, the great archer withdrew his soldiers and returned to his own camp.
Analysis: He only succeeded because he was amped with a rage booast, he was angry just like Arjuna was angry after Abhimanyu's death. Let's not forget the fact that Bhisma ran away from the battlefield before sunset.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 75
- 7th day)
- Bhisma tries to save the kauravas (despite knowing that Abhimanyu will not kill them)
Quote:
Bhishma was unassailable, even to the gods. In that battle, surrounded by many kings and hundreds of elephants, horses and chariots, he swiftly advanced to rescue your sons.
Analysis: Anyone can run to a place to rescue someone. grandparents have saved their grandchildren from getting kidnapped.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 80
- Bhisma advances to fight three warriors that he ends up not fighting
Quote:
To do battle, with the sons of Madri and Bhimasena, he went to the spot where Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, was stationed. Ganga’s son was wonderful in battle. He was set upon by all the maharathas together. But Shantanu’s great-souled son was not distracted.
Analysis: At-least he (Bhisma) doesn't get distracted like karna did in battles. He encountered all maharathas very well.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 81
- Bhisma attacks Sikhandi
Quote:
Shikhandi’s weapon had been sliced down by the king who was Shantanu’s son.
Analysis: See unlike KMG this one leaves out no confusions, bhisma broke his vow in the desperate situation to save his life (while he surrounded by many maharathis). Over here it directly says that it was Bhisma who did it.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 81
- Bhisma's performance from Yudhishthira's perspective.
Quote:
Behold. Bhishma is fighting with terrible force. He is tormenting the masses of my soldiers. The net of his arrows is fierce in its energy. Like Death himself, he is killing everything in an instant. Your bow has been sliced down by the king who is Shantanu’s son. You have been vanquished and are running away from the field of battle.
Analysis: As per Yudhsihthira Sikhandi was defeated by Bhisma. Although he exaggerated Bhisma's performance on purpose in order to goad Sikhandi.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 81
- Bhisma routs foot soldiers
Quote:
Bhishma is infinite in his valour. On seeing him, our soldiers are routed and are fleeing. O Drupada’s son! You are certainly frightened.
Analysis: Not a great feat for a double maharatha.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 81
- Bhisma defeats Yudhishthira
Quote:
In that battle, the great-souled and brave Bhishma sliced down the bow and colourful standard of Pandu’s son, King Yudhishthira Ajamidha. On seeing that Yudhishthira was overcome with fear and had cast aside his bow and arrows in that battle, Bhimasena grabbed a club and advanced on foot against Jayadratha.
Analysis: yudhishthira is a hypocrite as he did exactly what he insulted sikhandi for doing.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 81
- Bhisma thrashes Yudhishthira
Quote:
Having destroyed the iron arrow in battle, which was like death, Bhishma killed the horses, decorated with gold, of the Indra among Kouravas. With the horses slain, Yudhishthira, Dharma’s son, abandoned the chariot and swiftly ascended the chariot of the great-souled Nakula.
Analysis: Bhisma defeated Yudhishthira and yudhishthira defeated karna in a group attack (through deceit).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 82
- Bhisma defeats many kings and maharathas
Quote:
All the kings heard the words that Partha had addressed and they surrounded the grandfather with a large number of chariots. Your father, Devavrata, was surrounded in every direction. O king! He seemed to be playing with his bow and brought down those maharathas. While all the Parthas looked on, Kourava strode around on that field of battle, like a lion cub in the forest amidst a herd of deer.
Analysis: What is the use in defeating average warriors that don't affect the war effort at all?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 82
- Bhisma retreats from Sikhandi
Quote:
Shikhandi forcefully approached the grandfather of the Bharatas, asking him to wait. But Bhishma avoided Shikhandi in that battle, remembering Shikhandi’s feminine nature.299 Instead, he angrily attacked the Srinjayas. On seeing maharatha Bhishma, the Srinjayas were delighted.
Analysis: I dont care about the vows, if you retreat from your opponent in a war, and that person that is retreating is the general of the army then that man is a coward, he fled from the battlefield. That too when his soldiers needed him the most. Bhisma did not have a good reason because his fleeing did not benefit his army but at-least when Arjuna avoids someone (like bhisma/Drona) then it increases the chances of a Pandava victory.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 82
- 8th day)
- Bhisma felled Somakas, Srinjayas, Panchalas etc.
Quote:
But the great archer Bhishma prided himself in battle. With his arrows, he brought down the Somakas, together with the Srinjayas and the Panchalas. Though they were slaughtered by Bhishma, the Panchalas and the Somakas gave up their fear of death and quickly attacked Bhishma. O king! In that battle, the brave Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, powerfully sliced off the arms and the heads of those rathas. Your father, Devavrata, deprived the rathas of their chariots. The heads of horse-riders fell down from the horses. O great king! Confounded by Bhishma’s weapons, we saw elephants lying around like mountains, deprived of their riders.
Analysis: Bhisma was unable to create any fear among the enemy because no one was scared of him, despite seeing their comrades killed still the Panchalas, Srinjayas and Somakas fought well and continued to target Bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 84
- Bhisma was defeated by Bhima in one minute
Quote:
In that encounter, he was the one who engaged Bhishma. There was a terrible battle between Bhishma and Bhima and an extremely terrible and fearful roar arose from all the soldiers.306 The delighted Pandavas also roared like lions. Surrounded by his brothers, King Duryodhana protected Bhishma in that battle, which resulted in a destruction of men. Bhishma was supreme among rathas. But Bhima slew his charioteer. The horses were no longer controlled and dragged the chariot away in all directions.
Analysis: Bhima defeated bhisma, bhisma became a monkey infront of bhima during the eight day.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 84
- Bhisma slays maharathas
Quote:
The immensely strong Bhishma killed many maharathas with arrows that penetrated the innards and made the soldiers of the Pandavas tremble. He killed many men in Yudhishthira’s army, and many elephants, horse-riders, chariot-riders and horses. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! On witnessing Bhishma’s valour in that battle, we thought that it was as extraordinary as Shakra’s valour.
Analysis: They compared him to Indra (Shakra) but so what? Idnra and thirty other devas were defeated by Arjuna in Khandava-Daha.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 86
- Bhisma, Bhagadatta and kripa ambush a angry Arjuna
Quote:
Gangeya, Bhagadatta and maharatha Goutama countered the violent Pandava Arjuna. In that encounter, the atiratha repulsed all their weapons with his own weapons. He despatched many brave soldiers on your side to the land of the dead.
Analysis: Arjuna dominates them all. He countered all of their weapons.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 92
- 9th day)
- Another group attack on Yudhishthira by Bhisma, thhis time he comes with a whole battalion.
Quote:
With all the sons of Dhritarashtra and their soldiers, Bhishma attacked Yudhishthira and surrounded him from every direction.
Analysis: Bhisma cheated again, he could not conjure up the guts to fight Yudhishthira alone, he used the help of other people, of the osns of dhritarashtra (maybe seventy of them) against Yudhishthir.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 98
- Bhisma choose to target pawns (foot-soldiers) instead of the king (Yudhishthira)
Quote:
There was a terrible battle, destructive of people, between Bhishma and the Somakas. Gangeya, best among rathas, pierced the Pandava soldiers with hundreds and thousands of sharp arrows. Your father, Devavrata, crushed those soldiers, like a herd of cattle, crushing reaped paddy.
Analysis: Perhaps Yudhishthira defeated Bhisma, which is why he is going after weaker enemies.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 99
- Virata, Drupada, Shikandi and Dhrishtadyumna defeat Bhisma
Quote:
Dhrishtadyumna, Shikhandi, Virata and Drupada attacked Bhishma in that battle and struck the maharatha with arrows. He pierced Dhrishtadyumna and Virata with three arrows each. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! He then dispatched an iron arrow towards Virata. O king! Pierced by Bhishma, the destroyer of enemies, in that battle, those great archers became as angry as serpents that have been trod upon. Shikhandi pierced the grandfather of the Bharatas. But the undecaying one thought him to be a woman and did not strike him back. In that battle, Dhrishtadyumna was overcome with rage, like a flaming fire. He used three arrows to pierce the grandfather in the arms and the chest. Drupada pierced Bhishma with twenty-five arrows, Virata with ten arrows and Shikhandi with twenty-five. O great king! The great-souled Bhishma was pierced in that battle and was as beautiful as a blossoming red ashoka tree in the spring. Gangeya pierced them back with three arrows that travelled straight.381 O venerable one! He severed Virata’s bow with a broad-headed arrow. In the forefront of that battle, he took up another bow and pierced Bhishma with five sharp arrows and his charioteer with three.
Analysis: After this foot soldiers were described as protecting bhisma. Why would he need protection against weak Pancalas and a Matsya king? Although Virata's bow was cut off he fought fairly and was fast enough to tkae up another bow and launch eight arrows on Bhisma and his charioteer (driver). Not only that but no one else interfered in Virata vs Bhisma during the last two sentences of this passage. Except for soldiers that is, because they saw Virata defeat bhisma.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 99
- Bhisma defeats Satyaki
Quote:
It was terrible to behold. In that great battle, it was hurled through the force of Varshneya’s arms. It advanced with great force, like a fatal night advancing towards a man. O descendant of the Bharata lineage! On seeing it suddenly descend, Gangeya used two extremely sharp kshurapra arrows to slice it into two, so that it fell down on the ground. Having severed the javelin, he angrily struck Satyaki on the chest with nine arrows and the destroyer of enemies smiled as he did this. O Pandu’s elder brother! The Pandavas surrounded Bhishma in that battle, with their chariots, elephants and horses, so that Madhava387 might be rescued.
Analysis: Ok he defeated Satyaki, but Satyaki also defeated him a few tiems throughout the war. Not to mentioned Satyaki was defeated by Sakuni. So bhisma = sakuni now?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 100
- Bhisma assaults warriors (whose moves he should be able to predict by now)
Quote:
Your father was enraged. In that battle, he used supreme and sharp arrows to pierce the Parthas and their soldiers in every direction. He pierced Bhima with twelve arrows and Satyaki with nine, Nakula with three arrows and Sahadeva with seven. He struck Yudhishthira with twelve arrows in his chest and arms. The immensely strong one then pierced Dhrishtadyumna and roared. Nakula pierced him with twelve arrows and Madhava390 with three. Dhrishtadyumna pierced the grandfather back with seventy arrows, Bhimasena with five and Yudhishthira with twelve.
Analysis: Even though Dhrishtadyumna assailed Bhisma with 70 arrows Bhisma did not lift a finger to defend himself. What a coward.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 102
- Bhisma is dominated by Arjuna despite the latter being mild.
Quote:
Partha grasped his divine bow that roared like the clouds. He used sharp arrows to sever Bhishma’s bow and made it fall down. With the bow severed, Kouravya again grasped a giant bow. In only an instant, your father strung the bow, which made a sound like that of the clouds. But in his anger, Arjuna sliced down this second bow too. At this, Shantanu’s son praised his dexterity. ‘O Partha! Well done. O mighty-armed one! O Kunti’s son! Well done.’ Having thus addressed him, he grasped another beautiful bow. In that battle, Bhishma released many arrows towards Partha’s chariot. Vasudeva displayed supreme skill in handling the horses. He executed circular motions and avoided all those arrows. Wounded by arrows, Bhishma and Partha, tigers among men, looked beautiful. They were like two angry bulls, marked with the signs of horns. ‘“Vasudeva saw that Partha was fighting mildly. Bhishma was continuously showering down arrows in the battle.
Analysis: It's quite obvious that if Arjuna wanted than bhisma would not have survived, he kept cutting bhisma's bows and was stated to be mild.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 102
- 10th day)
- Bhisma fights the pandavas and dominates them
Quote:
In that battle, the maharatha Pandavas quickly attacked Bhishma together, like the wielder of the vajra assailed by asuras. He released sharp arrows that were like Shakra’s vajra to the touch. He was seen in every direction, having assumed a terrible form. As he fought in that battle, his bow was always seen whirling around in a circular motion, like Shakra’s giant bow. O lord of the earth! On witnessing his deeds in that battle, your sons were filled with supreme wonder and honoured the grandfather. The Parthas were dispirited at the way your brave father was fighting in the battle.
Analysis: Props to Bhisma for this but Arjuna (if he was even involved in this encoutner) was holding back and did not use all of his tools. No one was defeated over here anyways. A the Pandavas still continued this fight that day. Perhaps they were all takign it easy though because of the plan that bhisma gave them.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 104
- Bhisma attacks sikhandi's army
Quote:
On the tenth day of the battle, he began to consume Shikhandi’s array of chariots with his sharp arrows, like the one with the black trails406 burns a forest.
Analysis: So the man that refused to attack Sikhandi is now going to tattack her army and chariots huh? Bhisma seems double faced.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 104
- Bhisma still scared of Arjuna
Quote:
Savyasachi, the scorcher of enemies and the one who was never defeated, arrived at the spot, causing terror among all the rathas. He roared like a lion. He repeatedly drew his bow and released a shower of arrows. Partha roamed around on the field of battle, like Death. O bull among the Bharata lineage! Those on your side were frightened at the sound. O king! They fled in great fear, like deer because of a lion.
Analysis: So many defeats and retreats of Bhisma in the kurukshetra war.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 104
- Bhisma slaughters two lakh foot soldiers
Quote:
Gangeya stationed himself in the midst of the army, like an angry and virulent serpent, and the Pandavas surrounded him. On the tenth day, he exhibited his strength. O king! The descendant of the Kuru lineage killed hundreds and thousands. He sucked out the energy from the best of the Panchalas and the immensely strong princes, like the sun sucking up water with its rays. O great king! The spirited one killed ten thousand elephants and then killed ten thousand horses, with their riders. The best of men killed two hundred thousand foot soldiers.
Analysis: Well at-least we know from this incident that bhisma is better than karna, as foot soldiers defeated karna, but bhisma defeated foot soldiers.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 104
- Bhisma relies on divien astras to save his own life against the Somakas
Quote:
“In the battle, Bhishma killed the Somakas who were following Partha. He repulsed the soldiers of the maharatha Pandava. The chariot was the storehouse for the fire. The bow constituted the flames. The javelins and clubs were the kindling. He released a great shower of flaming arrows and consumed the kshatriyas in the battle. He was like a large fire that consumes deadwood when it moves around, driven by the wind. Bhishma blazed like that, showering his divine weapons. There were gold-shafted, straight-tufted and sharp arrows. The immensely illustrious Bhishma roared in the directions and the sub-directions. O king! He brought down chariots and elephants, with their riders.
Analysis: How come no one complains about bhisma's depserate situations in his life where he relied
too much on weapons of mass destruction?
too much on weapons of mass destruction?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 112
- The Pandvas & Shikandi overpower bhisma
Quote:
Your father, Devavrata, paid no heed to these arrows. Enraged in the battle, he countered Arjuna with arrows. O venerable one! In that encounter, he released sharp arrows and dispatched all the soldiers of the maharatha Pandava to the other world. O king! Supported by their large army, the Pandavas surrounded Bhishma and enveloped him, like clouds around the sun. O bull among the Bharata lineage! The descendant of the Bharata lineage was covered in every direction. In that battle, he consumed the enemy, like a flaming fire burns down a forest. ‘“We then beheld the extraordinary manliness of your son. So as to protect the one who was rigid in his vows, he fought with Partha. All the worlds were gratified at the deeds of your great-souled archer son, Duhshasana, in that battle.
Analysis: Then Duhsasana has to save him (Bhisma). Also this shows the weak nature of Bhisma, he did not care about weapons that could potentially take his life.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 112
- Bhisma chickened out upon seeing Sikhandi
Quote:
Bhishma used a divine weapon and in the sight of all the archers, advanced against Kounteya. In the battle, the armoured Shikhandi also endeavoured to attack. At this, Bhishma withdrew that weapon, which was like the fire. At this time, Kounteya, borne on white horses, confounded the grandfather and killed your soldiers.
Analysis: Bhisma took back his divine weapon/astra automatically when he saw the face of Sikhandi. Then Arjuna came in and taught Bhisma another lesson.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 112
- Bhisma makes poor use of the knowledge gained from parshuram
Quote:
On hearing the words of the commander, the Somakas, together with the Srinjayas, attacked Gangeya and showered down weapons on him from every direction. O king! Thus assailed, your father, Shantanu’s son, became intolerant and started to fight with the Srinjayas. O father!440 His achievements were glorious. In earlier times, the intelligent Rama441 had imparted an instruction of weapons to him, one that could destroy the armies of enemies. He resorted to that instruction, capable of destroying the forces of the enemy.
Analysis: Yet he didn't do any serious damage to the Pandava forces after ten days of Bhisma fighting with knowledge of Parshuram still the majority of the pandava army was strong, they had nearly all of their main generals and major warriors still alive, and over eighty percent of their troops were still standing in perfect shape/health.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
- Bhisma kills several nameless warriors
Quote:
But with the tenth day having been reached, Bhishma alone slew seven maharathas from the Matsyas and the Panchalas in the encounter and killed innumerable elephants and horses. In the great battle, the great-grandfather killed five thousand rathas and fourteen thousand men. He again killed one thousand elephants and ten thousand horses. O lord of the earth! Your father killed them through the strength of his instruction.
Analysis: What is great in murdering 7 maharathis when Arjuna got twenty five thousand of them in just one day?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
- Bhisma kills Virata's brother
Quote:
He agitated the ranks of all the kings and brought down Virata’s beloved brother, Shatanika. O great king!
Analysis: Shatanika is a featless warrior with no feats to his name. So killing him is not a great achievement for anybody. Especially not a double maharatha.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
- Bhisma kills a thousand kings
Quote:
Having killed Shatanika in the battle the powerful Bhishma brought down another one thousand kings with broad-headed arrows.
Analysis: Let's give Bhisma a few points for achieving this feat of killing a thosuand warrior kings without any astras and only using broad headed arrows.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
- Bhisma kills kings that followed Arjuna
Quote:
In the army of the Parthas, there were kings who had followed Dhananjaya. Whichever one among these approached Bhishma was sent to Yama’s abode.
Analysis: Those kings were probably less caustious and alert because they had Arjuna on their side.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 113
- Bhisma lost his armor in a battle with Srinjayas
Quote:
Together with all the Srinjayas, they assailed Bhishma. His armour was shattered and he was oppressed everywhere, in many ways. But despite having been pierced in his inner organs, Gangeya was not distressed.
Analysis: People say Karna shattered bhima's armor but forget that karna was a double maharatha while bhima was a atiratha. Over here bhisma is considered a double maharatha and his armor was shattered by ordinary Rathas (average warriors who don't know astras but fight on chariots).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 114
- Bhisma's bows are severed by Arjuna's arrows
Quote:
“Kiriti, best among rathas, was protected by Krishna and in that battle, after Bhishma’s bow had been severed, pierced him with ten arrows. He struck down his charioteer with ten and his standard with one. Gangeya grasped a bow that was more powerful. However, Phalguna sliced that down with a sharp and broad-headed arrow. Pandava was enraged and one after another, Savyasachi, the scorcher of enemies, severed every bow that Bhishma took up. When the bows were severed, he445 became wrathful and licked the corners of his mouth.
Analysis: What type of warrior cannot protect his bow, what type of archer is this?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 114
- Arjuna defeats Bhisma and severs all of bows.
Quote:
Placing Shikhandi at the forefront, the wrathful Kiriti attacked Bhishma and severed his bow once again.451 He pierced him with ten arrows and sliced down his standard with one. He struck his charioteer with ten arrows and made him tremble. Gangeya took up another bow that was stronger still. In that great battle, in the twinkling of an eye and as soon as that other bow was taken up, Dhananjaya severed it into three with sharp and broad-headed arrows. In this fashion, he severed many bows. ‘“At this, Bhishma, Shantanu’s son, determined that he would not fight with Bibhatsu any more. However, he was pierced by twenty-five kshudrakas and thus pierced, the great archer spoke to Duhshasana. ‘This maharatha Pandava Partha is enraged in the battle. In this encounter, he has shot many thousands of arrows towards me. No one is capable of vanquishing him in battle, not even the wielder of the vajra.
Analysis: Even Bhisma said that Arjuna cannot be defeated, and based on the above text Arjuna is dominating the fight.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 114
- Bhisma (although wounded and vominiting blood & bleeding profusely) still manages to bag ten thousand more kills to his list
Quote:
On the tenth day, stationed in that battle, though he was pierced in his vital organs, Bhishma killed ten thousand warriors.
Analysis: I am sick of even seeing/reading bhisma fight. I have been studying him for hours now.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 114
- Bhisma finally falls
Quote:
“While your sons looked on, thus the lord, your father, was wounded with sharp-tipped arrows released by Phalguna and fell down from his chariot. There was a little bit of the day left. When Bhishma fell down from his chariot, great sounds of lamentation were heard from the gods in heaven and the kings in every direction. On seeing that the great-souled grandfather had fallen down, together with Bhishma, all our hearts also fell down. When the mighty-armed one fell down, the earth seemed to roar. The great archer fell down, like an uprooted pole that has been erected in Indra’s honour. Because he was covered with a large number of arrows, he did not touch the ground. The great archer, bull among men, was supine on a bed of arrows. When he fell down from the chariot, a divine essence permeated him. The clouds showered rain and the earth trembled.
Analysis: It's a good thing that his arc is over now, he was a weak warrior anyways. He could not defeat foot soldiers not warriors like dhrishtadyumna, yudhishthira, abhimanyu, satyaki, bhima, ghatotkaca, arjuna etc. They all are much better than him. People accuse and blame Arjuna, krishna, Sikhandi for the death of bhisma but what about the kauravas that are clearly stated to be watching the scene as mere spectators not lifting a finger to help their poor grandfather out in his time of need?
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 114
- Debunking a few theories to defend Bhisma's honor.
- Misconception 1) Bhisma not allowing any member of the Kuru family to die
- These are the people (of their family) that died during Bhisma's reign as cheif.
- Iravat (son of Arjuna) heir to both the Kurus and the Nagas, (hastinapore was also called nagapura).
- In-laws of the kuru family died.
- The Kalinga's, they were in-laws of Duryodhana (as one of his wives was a kalinga princess).
- Matsya princes (they were brothers of Arjuna's son's wife).
- Uttara
- Sankhya
- Kaurava brothers died, 29 of them.
- Misconception 2) Bhisma promising to spare the lives of the Pandavas
- Bhisma only vowed to kill the Pandavas.
- Duryodhana said Bhisma would kill them
Quote:
What we have thought about for many years has now come to pass. With their soldiers, the Pandavas will be slain and the kingdom will be obtained. I think that Bhishma’s protection is our task now. Protected by us, he will cheerfully slaughter the Parthas in this battle.
Analysis: Partha's equals sons of Pritha (Kunti).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 95
- Bhisma was described as wanting to kill Arjuna, so he was not holding back.
Quote:
On seeing Madhava thus pierced, Arjuna became extremely angry. In that encounter, he pierced Gangeya’s charioteer with three arrows. In that encounter, the brave ones took aim against each other and endeavoured to kill each other, but did not succeed.
Analysis: They were shooting to kill just like Sanjay Dutt told his officers to do in the film of Shootout at Lokhandwala (2007).
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 48
- Bhishma himself vowed to slay the Pandavas
Quote:
For the sake of your welfare, I have carried out the pledge I made to you. I will perform an even greater task in this great battle today. I will sleep after being slain, or I will kill the Pandavas today. O tiger among men! I will today free myself from the great debt I owe you.
Analysis: His goal that day was death of the Pandavas.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 105
- Danavas possessed Bhisma
Quote:
Other asuras will penetrate Bhishma, Drona and Kripa. Possessed by them, they will discard their kindness and fight with your enemies. O supreme among Kurus! When the danavas have possessed their inner souls, they will cast aside all affection and kill everyone in battle—sons, brothers, fathers, relatives, students, kin, young and old.
Analysis: It's clearly written that Bhisma will be supported by by Asuras & Danavas. And that they will possess his body so that he casts aside all of the kindness & fights without mercy.
Source: Vana Parva Section 240
- Misconception 3) Bhisma had five golden arrows
- Break the conception.
Duryodhan approached Bhishm that night and accused him of not fighting the battle to his full strength because of his affection for the Pandavas. Bhishm, greatly angered, immediately picked up five golden arrows and chanted mantras declaring, "Tomorrow I will kill the Pandavas with these five golden arrows." Duryodhan, not having faith in Bhishm's words, asked Bhishm to give him custody of the five arrows saying that he would keep them with him and return them the next morning. Long before this event, when Pandavas were in living in the forest, Duryodhan once came to the forest to flaunt his material opulence in order to contrast the Pandavas who were living in exile in poverty. His intent was malice, wickedness, and hate. He placed his camp on the opposite side of a pond where the Pandavas used to stay. But Chitrasen, the leader of Gandharvas (and a great friend of Arjun during Arjun's visit to Indralok) came to know of this wicked plan. He too placed his retinue nearby before Duryodhan camped. When Duryodhan's camp ladies wanted to take a bath in the pond, they were curtly told to go away. Duryodhan could not tolerate this. This led to a fight in which the Gandharvas captured him. On the request of Yudhishthir, Arjun saved Duryodhan and set him free. Duryodhan was ashamed, but being a kshatriya, he asked Arjun what benediction or boon he would like. Arjun replied that he would ask for the boon later when he needed it. It was during that night that Krishna reminded Arjun of his unsatisfied boon and told him to go to Duryodhan and ask for the five golden arrows. When Arjun came and asked for the five golden imbued arrows, Duryodhan was shocked, but knowing full well his honour and duty as a kshatriya declared, "I will give you the five golden arrows. But can you please tell me who told you the five golden imbued arrows existed in the first place?" Arjun replied with a smile, "Who else other than Shri Krishna could have advised me?" Afterwards, Duryodhan honourably kept his word and gave the five golden arrows imbued with a lifetime of austerity and power by Bhishm. Later, Duryodhan broke his customary manner and conceded to himself privately, "All of the rishis say Krishna is the Supreme God, maybe they are right." Being shocked and convinced by Arjun's knowledge of the very existence of the five golden arrows, Duryodhan secretly got on his knees and said a quick prayer to Krishna. Duryodhan again went to Bhishm, informing him of all that happened and requesting another five golden imbued arrows. To this Bhishm laughed and replied, "That is not possible, child. The will of the Lord is Supreme and undeniable. I have already spent the merits of my lifetime of celibacy and austerity in those five arrows, a potency strong enough to end all the five Pandavas. However, Krishna, being the Supreme Lord has foreseen this, knowing past, present, and future as He alone can, and has thus arranged for you to voluntarily give up the five golden arrows, imbued with the power and potency of my lifelong austerities. I cannot imbue another five arrows, having spent all of the merits of my austerities.
Analysis: Whatever you just read in that quote is a fake story that does not belong in any canon/authentic breeds of the Mahabharata texts. Furthermore, the Mahabharata describes several powerful weapons like the Brahmasira, Pasupata, Narayana, Vaishnava, Vajra, Vasavi etc. It even shows the weaker missiles like Agneya, Parjanya, Varuna, Vavavya, etc. But it never even once touches on or explains these five golden arrows.... So, these mysterious five arrows are unexplained & remain a mystery. Mainly based on the fact that they are not mentioned anywhere in the Mahabharata. And Duryodhana never offered any boon/boons to Arjuna during the ghosha-yatra incident.
- Misconception 4) Bhisma forced krishna to raise weapons twice
- First instance
Quote:
Vasava’s younger brother144 was unable to tolerate the act of the foremost among the kings running away. In that battle, he saw that Bhishma was exerting all his powers, that Partha was mild and that the Kurus were advancing from every direction. ‘“Unable to tolerate it, the great-souled and illustrious one, the protector of all the Dasharhas, spoke approvingly to Shini’s descendant. ‘O brave descendant of the Shini lineage! Those who are running away, are indeed running away. O Satvata! Let those who are still here, also flee. Behold. In this battle, I will today bring down Bhishma from his chariot and also Drona and all their followers. O Satvata! There is no charioteer among the Kouravas who will escape when I am enraged in battle today. I will grasp the terrible chakra and rob the one who is great in his vows, of his life.145 O descendant of Shini! I will kill Bhishma and his followers and Drona, the foremost among charioteers. I will act so as to bring pleasure to Dhananjaya, the king,146 Bhima and the two Ashvins.147 I will kill all the sons of Dhritarashtra and the foremost among kings who are on their side.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 55
- Adressing this
We all know (hopefully) that Krishna did not fight Bhisma, Drona and co... So why trust his words over here? He wasn't telling the truth. He was most likely goading Arjuna to get serious and to drop his feelings and morals against Bhisma, Drona etc.
- Second instance
Quote:
"Vasudeva saw that Partha was fighting mildly. Bhishma was continuously showering down arrows in the battle. Stationed between the two armies, he was as scorching as the sun. He was killing the best of the best in the army of Pandu’s son. Against Yudhishthira’s forces, Bhishma was like the destruction at the end of a yuga. The mighty-armed Madhava, the destroyer of enemy heroes, could not tolerate this. O venerable one! He abandoned Partha’s horses, which had the complexion of silver. Full of anger, the great yogi descended from the great chariot. The powerful one advanced towards Bhishma, with his arms as weapons. The spirited one had a whip in his hand and roared repeatedly like a lion. The lord of the universe seemed to make the earth shatter with his footsteps. Krishna’s eyes were coppery red with anger. The infinitely radiant one wished to kill him. In the great battle, those on your side lost their senses. They saw Madhava advance against Bhishma in that battle, as if he would swallow him up. ‘Bhishma has been slain. Bhishma has been slain.’
Analysis: After this Arjuna put Krishna in check and held him back, Krishna listened and continued to drive the chariot.
Source: Bhishma Parva Section 102
- Addressing this
Krishna did this because of Arjuna's mildness and the fact that Arjuna was holding back. If Arjuna was not holding back then krishna would not choose to raise weapons.
- The amount of Kourava brothers killed during Bhishma's reign as Chief.
- Names of those brothers
- On the 4th day
- Senapati
- Sushena
- Jalasandha
- Sulochana
- Ugra
- Bhimaratha
- Bhima
- Bhimabahu
- Alolupa
- Durmukha
- Dushpradharsha
- Vivitsu
- Vikata
- Soma
- On the 7th day
- Sunabha
- Adityaketu
- Bahvashi
- Kundadhara
- Mahodara
- Aparajita
- Panditaka
- Vishalaksha
- On the 8th day
- Anadhrishti
- Kundabheda
- Vairata
- Dirghalochana
- Dirghabahu
- Subahu
- Kanakadhvaja.
- Average amount of kauravas killed per day
- For bhisma. It averages to 2.9 killed every day, for 10 days equals 29 kaurava brothers.
- For karna 27 kauravas brothers were killed in his two days of being the generalissimo. That makes his average 13.5 per day.
- As a matter of fact these twenty-seven were alone killed on the seventeenth day itself so it should really only be one day not two days as the divider, but i'm being lenient towards karna.
- So if i were to choose between Bhisma and Karna as who is the better generlissimo of course i would choose bhisma.
Bhisma's gradebook:
Weighted Grade (how does bhisma stack up against the other general of the kauravas): Better than Shalya, Equal to Karna, Inferior to Aswathama and Drona. I mean Bhisma does not even have knowledge about the chakravyuha. But he did pretty well as a commander in-cheif if you compare him to the others in his job who had to do what he did.
But i have the right to say this now.
- Bhisma failed to kill ordinary elephants of the Pandava army on the first day of the war.
- During day 1 Abhimanyu dominated his fight with Bhisma and five others.
- On the 1st day Bhisma ran away from Arjuna to fight Drupada (a warrior his own age).
- Bhisma failed to counter the Indrastra of Arjuna and retreated from the war.
- Satyaki defeated Bhisma on the 2nd day of the war.
- Yudhishthira and some panchala warrior defeated Bhisma & Drona on the 3rd day.
- On the 3rd day Bhisma accepted defeat at the hands of krishna.
- Arjuna defeated Bhisma, Bhurishravas, Shalya and Duryodhana on the 3rd day.
- On the 4th day Satyaki defeated bhisma again and was about to kill him, but demon Alambush saved him.
- During the fifth day Sikhandi rushed towards Bhisma and Drona, but Bhisma chose to run away.
- On the 6th day Bhisma killed Panchala warriors and then ran away to his own camp to avoid fighting the rest of them.
- On the 7th day Bhisma met Shikandi who forced him to retreat from her. He ran away to the srinjayas instead.
- During day 8 Bhima killed Bhisma's charioteer and defeated him in one minute, bhisma fled like usain bolt.
- On the 8th day when Arjuna's eldest son (Iravat) died, Bhisma tried to ambush an angry Arjuna with the help of Bhagadatta & kripa. But Arjuna dominates them all and they fail to gain any advantage over him.
- On the 9th day of the war Shikandi attacked Bhisma, and as usual Bhisma ran away.
- On the 9th day of the war Virata wounded Bhisma's charioteer and Bhisma himself, the latter was helpless and needed foot soldiers to rescue him xD.
- Yudhishthira defeated Bhisma and seventy kaurava brothers on the 9th day, so bhisma chose to fight foot soldiers instead.
- On the 9th day bhisma accepted defeat at the hands of krishna.
- During the begininng of the 10th day Bhisma ran away from Arjuna in fear.
- On the 10th day, the Pandavas and Sikhandi defeated Bhisma and were about to kill him but then Duhsasana (the incarnation of Indrajit as per MTN) had to come in and rescue Bhisma.
- During the tenth day, Srinjaya rathis cut off bhisma's armor and disrobed him in battle.
- On day 10, arjuna cut off two (2) bows of Bhisma and Bhisma said Arjuna cannot be defeated.
- On the 10th day of the war Arjuna shot a thousand arrows on Bhisma's body, this led him to fall off his chariot and not be able to move.
People will say "defeat is common in war" which i agree too but you know what else is common? Victory. That being said, he's not a worthy adversary of Arjuna.
By the way for those of you who don't get it yet ALL OF THIS is from BORI. If KMG was included then we would have EVEN SWETA defeating Bhisma.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt Arjuna was greatest but abusing Bhishma like that is not good.
ReplyDeletewhy not? you do realize that bhisma basically called himself a slave and a eunuch he insulted himself several times.
Deleteif i was alive then i would cut bhishmas lund and feed it to him because he was an ugly bastard that should have been killed by shisupals foot
Deletea better warrior was sakunis son ULUK fuck bheeshma and his dumbass fans
we should abuse bheeshma he was a namard and a disgrace he got killed by pakistans dogs
Deleteabe atharva walia, compete me. Morn hone ka samay aagaya hai. Mahamahim ke vishay me main pralaap nahi sun paunga.
DeleteTum ardha rathi he kya?
Never abuse Bhishma
Understand.
You better understand. And who is chirkut?
Bhishma is a great guy and so is mukesh khanna.
mukesh khanna is too ugly though, look at his nose, he is worthless than my tati
Deleteand why should no one abuse Bhishma? He forgave Satyavati when she rode the COCK OF PARASHARA and was unfaithful to his father Shree Shantanu
How is Bhishma deserving of respect? He does not respect his father.
autak nahi lene wale atharva walia, tu apna muk band hi karle.
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletebhishma had to die on bed of arrows of arjuna. do you have any idea how arjuna might have felt on the 10th day of the war?
Deleteactually I doubt Bhishma dying as there was an illusion I think where Bhishma died but actually just went and reached Vasu Loka
Deletebhishma got his ass kicked by Shakunis son Uluk during the 7th day
DeleteYou seem to be sick puppy harboring selective hate for mythological characters.
ReplyDeleteAnd you seem to be a chirkut who is jealous of the achievements of a mard like jaideep
Deletemukesh khanna was a chutiya and a namard
Deleteabe atharva walia, tu apun ke same Pitamah bhishma ki bareme ke gali kayku le raha re be? Teri ma ne tereko sanskaar nahi sikayi kya
DeleteThe reason i would never fear going to india and insulting bastards like hanuman, bhishma is because i know indians are weak they are not tough like me how many indians can lift 200 lbs in the gym? How many indians are tough?
DeleteBhishmas fans would always lose a fist fight to real men
Aryan history, letś see who is more tough?
Deletebhishma was disloyal to a mahatma like duryodhanji, after all bhishma spoke against duryodhan and stole the rights of duryodhans father to be king so bhishma was a disloyal namard with a 2 inch dick
Deleteoh my god. Dhritarashtra was a blind man and hence, he could not be made the king and he cared more about his son than about the welfare of the kingdom. Had Pandu not been cursed and continued to be a king, I do not think Draupadi would ever be disrobed and living in hastinapura would be like living in heaven. One thing I appreciate about duryodhana is he helped karna but duryodhana is really not a mahatma according to me because he wanted draupadi to sit on his thighs.
Deleteduryodhan was a better man than bhishma and so was dhritarashtra so kindly shut the fuck up otherwise ill kill your mom before i kill you
Deleteand pandu has a better campaign than namard karna
your namard bhishma was inferior to Shikandi, Dhrishtadyumna, king Virat, king Drupad, Brihatkshatra so go fuck yourself
how dare you say that? bhishma was superior to shikandi, dhrishtadyumna, virata, and drupada
Deletebecause its true these warriors defeated bhishma and parshuram
DeleteYudhishthir defeated Drona twice.
ReplyDelete1st defeat:
With that he baffled the weapon of Drona. Seeing all his weapons baffled, Drona, filled with wrath and desirous of accomplishing the destruction of Yudhishthira, invoked into existence the Brahma weapon. Enveloped as we then were by a thick gloom, we could not observe what passed. All creatures also, O monarch, were filled with great fright. Beholding the Brahma weapon uplifted, Kunti's son, Yudhishthira, O king, baffled it with a Brahma weapon of his own. Then, all the foremost warriors applauded those two bulls among men, viz., Drona and Yudhishthira, those great bowmen acquainted with every mode of warfare. Abandoning Yudhishthira, Drona then, with eyes red as copper in rage, began to consume the division of Drupada with the Vayavya weapon.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07153.htm
2nd defeat:
The son of Pandu then pierced Drona with his steeds, driver, standard, and car, with a thousand arrows. All this seemed exceedingly wonderful. Afflicted with the strokes of those arrows and feeling great pain, Drona, that bull among Brahmanas, sat down for a while on the terrace of his car. Recovering his senses, sighing like a snake, and filled with great rage, the preceptor invoked into existence the Vayavya weapon. The valiant son of Pritha, bow in hand, fearlessly baffled that weapon with a similar weapon of his in that encounter. And the son of Pandu also cut in two fragments the large bow of the Brahmana. Then Drona, that grinder of Kshatriyas, took up another bow. That bull of Kuru's race, Yudhishthira, cut off that bow also, with many keen shafts.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07158.htm
Yudhishthir destroyed Drona's Brahmastra on the 14th day (yudhishthir himself was defeated by drona in the end though): "Beholding it coursing towards him impetuously, O king, Drona, that foremost of all persons acquainted with weapons invoked into existence the weapon called Brahma. That weapon, reducing that dart of terrible mien into dust, coursed towards the car of the illustrious son of Pandu. Then, O sire, king Yudhishthira of' great wisdom baffled that weapon of Drona, thus coursing towards him by himself invoking the Brahma weapon. And then piercing Drona himself in that battle with five straight shafts, he cut off, with a sharp razor-faced shaft, the large bow of Drona."
Deletehttps://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07102.htm
Sahadeva saved Yudhishthir in the above link (Drona Parva Section 102 Kmg) by carrying him with his chario, he was a good bodygaurd and rescuer for Yudhishthira.
DeleteHere he defeated and killed Prince Niramitra of the Trigarta dynasty:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07103.htm
I think the author is such a bhishma hater that he should ne Shikhandi's reincarnation in kaliyuga.
DeleteNo one cares Abhay. You are a bhuzdil like bhishma and bhishma pitamah is a tati that deserved only death.
Deleteatharva walia, jab tum mahamahim aur anyelogonko abshabd baate bolteho, kya tumne ek baar vichar kyu nahi lagte ki bhishma is a mahamaharathi and that he was very strong?
Deletestop it atharva. just stop it. I can take a screenshot of this webpage for your kind information.
everybody stop abusing bhishma
he was never called MAHAMAHIM its a fanmade term by impotent tv serial writers that grew up in the shittiest place of earth known as India so dont fucking say the word MAHAMaHEEM
DeleteBhishma was actually a king of Hastinapur, tv series wont show you that and you will always be a retard who ignores the truth so kill yourself
actually he was called mahamahim you wretch. you atharva walia. but you a pak so what can one say>
Deleteatharva walia.
typical pak mentality
stop trying to act american. You are not cool. He was not the king f hastinapura.
atharva wali - you have intellect where is your intellect when you abuse bhishma you napunsaka kaiyar.everybody BAN ATHARWA WALIA PLEASE.\
india is not s*itty. hindustan mahan desh hei according to me
Deletetume yeh nirnay lena chaiye ki pakistan ek mahan desh he ya nahi?
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletebhishma paid people. he was never like, oh you have to be my slave accordin to me. m\he paid people to carry his orders. hum indians mard ko janm sehi woh he joh sare mard ko hona chaihye.
Deletedhrishtadyumna , satyaki, bhima and arjuna were maharathis but they themselves said bhishma is stronger and better than all of them combined.
ab hindustan ki logoke bareme abshabd bolna puri tara band kardo, ye mere iccha hai, walia saab.
Deletenone of these people said bhishma was better they all agreed that he was a namard and a weakling even yudhishthir has defeated bhishma ten times when bhishma hid behind the sons of shree Dhritarashtra
DeleteWOW. I pointed out a flaw in one of your Quora answers and you delete my comment and block me! I guess the principle of free speech you you keep blathering on about doesn't apply when it exposes false facts in your answer.
ReplyDeleteThis kind of behaviour is typical of deluded leftists. You surround yourself with yes men and masturbate together. Shows what an insecure, impotent snowflake you are.
You might have blocked me on Quora, try blocking me or finding out who I am in other social media!!
DeleteYour stupidity shines through once more in putting link to this site in your Quora description.
You impotent effeminate bastard with 1/2 inch dick, go and suck Karna's cock.
If you want to insult me or troll me or get back at me. Then you have to tell me who you are so i can remember WHO THE PERSON IS that blocked me. Jog my memory and BEFORE YOU ASK yes this account is used by Jaideep.
DeleteI will wait 3 more days for a response.
Deleterespond back wampyre
DeleteWampyre, Atharva Wali, The new Vijay Mallya is like that. Leave him or is he really him. I think I should say her. Yeah leave her. Shikandi was a man but hid behind and made Bhishma drop weapons. So leaver her, I mean walia alone
Deletewampyre will not respond to you because he was defeated and choose to leave the internet
Deletean you aryan history should shut up and not interfere when I am or at least was talking to atharva walia and wampyre and you I think should shut up.
DeleteEVERYBODY PLEASE BAN ATHARVA WALIA AND ARYAN HISTORY!
lmfao! this is typical behavior of chutiyas whenever they lose an argument they try to ban the king, mard, sher, tiger that told the truth and beat bhishma up
Deletetum american banne ki kamna aur bakwaas acting hi band kardalo.
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletenone of these people said bhishma was better they all agreed that he was a namard and a weakling even yudhishthir has defeated bhishma ten times when bhishma hid behind the sons of shree Dhritarashtra
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThe current mahabharata, from which the Author is quoting, is incorrect. Just imagine, here we see one warrior sending hundreds of arrows, all strike another maharathi. Then that maharathi strikes back etc... is all filled in this mahabharat.
ReplyDeleteThe funny thing is various people here are fighting each other in comments section on the basis this incorrect mahabharat.
Do you think even a strong warrior like bhim can survive for 5 mins if he gets struct by 10 arrows.....what to say about 100 arrows?
The original book was Jai which was wrriten by shri Ganesh and authored by Shri Vyasa, then came Bharat and then Mahabharat.
I guess the original mahabharat was named after Jaideep then?
Deleteatharva walia, tu apne aukat ka smaran rak and you, espcially there jese pak logo ko, they should no troll other people. You get walia.
DeleteAtharva, apni aukat ko yad diladena.
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deleteyeah aur tum racism nahi dikate abusing indians.
DeleteHum Bhishma, ek hindu ki bat horahehey.
bhishma and hindus are losers like duryodhan they fuck eachhother LoLOLOL
DeleteJaydeep Kya teri ma ko kutte nai choda tha kya ki tere under god nai Mind nhi bheja..
ReplyDeletespeak in ENglish if you want a real man like jaideep to understand you he does not speak the language of the dickless eunuchs in india that sucked the dick of bheeshma after he farted when hanumans mother punjiksthala got fucked in the ass by ravan
DeleteYash, do not insult animals by comparing them to atharva walia or whoever is using that account
DeleteAtharva Walia, I am speaking in your english. I responded to you but you still did not respond back and yur responses sound like your mind is messed up. Is your mouth and tongue messed up too? Huh! Why are you being a coward after insulting my man. COme on!
DeleteJaideep or Atharva, where are you huh? What happened?
DeleteAtharva walia what happened
DeleteDebate using kmg or bori ce, i would still win this debate due to my superior intellect and cunning, this blog post already has the quotes of bori ce to prove bhishma is a weak warrior. i can prove he was a bad person too
DeleteHE WAS ACTUALLY A KING OF HASTINAPUR he never abdicated any throne
actually he was not you dumb pk
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteSchool shooters and the rapists of Priyanka Reddy are all bad people but still worthy of more respect than bheeshma will ever be. No one should give respect to this chutiya.
ReplyDeleteEver Bheeshma fan should kill themselves.
Fans of ganga putra bheeshma do not deserve to live. Please die.
I am a Bhishmaś fan. WHat crime did Bhishma commit?
DeleteI am alive and a Bhishmaś fan.. COme on atharva walia. I am speaking english. Ima man. Talkin stuff about bhishma. Your arjuna any better.
DeleteI like Arjuna as a warrior not as a person the crimes of Bhishma are putting the sons of Vyasa on the throne, Vyasa is not the son of Bhishma's father yet he still lets his blood go on the throne.
DeleteHOW DOES BHISHMA RESPECT HIS FATHER? He cared about the women that cheated on him more. He is A CUCK AND SIMP.
he is not a cuck and a simp.
Deletebhishma simped for Satyavati and let illegitimate sons like Dhritarastra, Pandu etc inherit the throne even though vyas has no right on hastinapur his sons got that throne
Deleteif bhishma's father santanu was alive he would pee on his face and disown him for being an idiot
actually he would not.
Deletesatyavati was born to a king but raised by a fisherman.
a napunsak like bhishma cant stand two seconds in a fight with eklavya (the son of a fisherman that peed in hanumans mouth)
Deletethis is true Virata defeated that bastard Bheeshma Pitamaha in section 99 but tv serials dont show the power of Virats character they just suck bheeshmas tiny dick cause they feel sorry for him and call him a great man
ReplyDeletedrishtadyumna also kicked bheeshmas ass in section 102
so bheeshma is not in the best 10
Hahahahahahhahahahahaha.
DeleteDhristadyumna according to me is a shameless guy who committed brahmin hatya by killing his own guru!!!!!!!!
Drupada could not defeat Drona by himself so h conducted a yagna .
Pandavas knowing that Panchala is enemy of bhishma, drona, duryodhana married panchali .
for arjuna to win, karna, ashwathama, and ekalavya had to pay a heavy price.
Using abusive words on Bhishma? He was the one who imparted statecraft to Yudhisthira.
Bhishma imparting statecraft is interpolated BECAUSE Yudhisthir already knew how to run a kingdom like Indraprasth. So for Yudhishtir to learn how to run a weak nation like hastinapur especially from a namard like bhishma whose dead is a false concept.
DeleteDrupad had Viashnavastra he earned from Parashuram.
Whats the point of respecting Bhishma when he does not have respect for men? He licked the ass of an ugly kutti like Satyavati that farts everyday
it is not interpolated. Kindly read shanti parva of mahabharata
Deletealso dhrishatadyuman had the special ability called "Kyoka Suigetsu" he can manipulate the five senses of anyone he would only lose to Arjuna, Krishna, Satyaki and Abhimanyu or Ghatotkatch and Bhagdatt
DeleteHe defeated Bhishma on day 7
even in BR CHopra episode 78 he says "i spared bheeshmas life so many times"
Bhishma is an undefeated warrior. In the virata war, he was fighting arjuna and he quickly started to chase and fight duryodhana. SO Bhishma was neevr actually defeated
ReplyDeletehow is he undefeated? bhishma was defeated by eklavyas father and the dogs of afghanistans army
Deletebhishma cried when his brother was killed by drupad's vaishnavastra
when did drupada have vaishnavastra and is it a crime to cry if your brother dies? I do not think so. Bhishma's weapons are way stronger and sharper than the ever abusive tongues of atharva walia, aryan history and the author of this bs webpage, the only mard of india who according to me is not a mard at all.
Delete1. Drupad was trained by the mighty brahmin Parashuram who Bhishma cheated to win against.
Delete2. Drupad used normal arrows to break Karna's armor in Achichatra (a city-state)
3. Drupad used Vaishnavastra to win his YUDH against Bhagadatta on the 11th day.
4. Drupad held back & repulsed attacks from Bhishma and Dron COMBINED at the 1st day when Arjuna spared Bhishmas life and refused to fight, during this time Arjun was learning the bhagavad gita so Drupad had to use full power
5. Drupad only lost three fights in his life (dron because hes a real man, arjun because hes a badass criminal) it was vrishasen who defeated him because it was night time and drupad was very old and injured from battles, while vrishasen entered just now so he was fresh, his win over drupad was a fluke
Drupad is stronger than hanuman, parashuram, bhishma, karna united
ahahahaha , no he is not. Arjuna defeated him easily and the same arjuna would be defeated by hanuman, parashuram, bhishma, individually. ya dude. and you from kistan uh?
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deleted
DeleteTo be honest, In my opinion, for arjuna to win, karna, ashwathama, and ekalavya had to pay a heavy price and arjuna fans are tucha daridra. According to me, they are foremost of all losers
ReplyDeletereplace "arjuna" with bhishma and you are correct because each of those warriors were superior to bhishma and the weak chirkut known as Parashuram followed by the hairy childless kutta called "Hanuman" i prefer to call him Hanutati instead xD
DeleteAs for Arjuna he defeated Shiva 9 times, i think you should show him izzat.
Arjuna's student Satyaki defeated Drona, karna & Bhishma that makes Satyaki better than Vishnu as his avatar Parashuram was a loser.
And Ashwathama never paid a heavy price, he was just impotent which is why he lacked any offspring, this price is because he agreed to fight under the banner of Bhishma so Ashwathama's lund was unable to fully erect semen
no, it is because of drona and arjuna. musalmaan lagate ho tum.
DeleteParashurama and Bhishma are no losers nor did indra and arjuna, let alone arjuna's students were able to defeat bhishma, drona , and karna.
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteHhahahahahhhaa. Bhishmaś prashwapastra cannot be countered by sammohanastra and prajna astra. It will break them and instantly make the enemies fall asleep. Bhishma possessed ALL, I mean ALL DIVYASTRAS AND CELESTIAL WEAPONS. Do not evevevveveveveerr abusse Bhishma, the illustrious son of Ganga who gave up his throne for the sake of the father who never en raised him
ReplyDeletebhishmas weapons were all weak he deserves to be abused as he doesnt really care about his father you should kill yourself for spreading fake information go lick your moms pussy clean
Deleteoh really. You cannot use these types of language. who made this webpage up?
Deletewhy should I kill myself? Where did I start spreading fake information. Just so you know, I took a screenshot of the post you put.
Deletethe reason is because:
Delete1. U refuse to acknowledhge facts.
2. U spread lies about Arjuna to degrade him and lies about Karna to support and uplift him & you also overrate Bhishma through spreading lies like a kutta.
3. Another reason is that you are a SPAMMER youre not interested in knowing the truth therefore you only deserve the thrashing i am giving you right now, which is why i chosoe to troll you and force you to commit suicide
Because the world would be a beautiful place without fans of Bhishma, Hanuman, Parashuram, Lakshman, Karna etc
their is only 3 villains of Mahabharat i respect they are Suyodhan, Jayadrath & shri Drona. Fuck the rest.
you liar.
Deletedo not talk hinduism
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletemy genes i think are good
DeleteAll the panchala women are disgusting and tuu. I feel like spitting on them. Drupada forgot the promise made toDrona and did not deserve to rule even a peck of a needle of his kingdom and did yagna to obtain dhristradyumna and draupadi, because of whom a war took place
ReplyDeleteAccording to me, i hated panchala but may goddess draupadi forgive me. I spoke according to my mind to be honest. I felt that drona and karna deserved to live longer
DeleteI just id not like shikandi, that women because of whom bhishma had to be on bed of arrows. I request the aouthor to remove the comment that talks ill about panchala women
Deleteyou can say whatever you want to about panchala women but the fact is that they were tougher than bhishmas ugly fat mother ganga and bhishma himself
Deletemother ganga is holy and sacred. How can you abuse her? Did you forget she is a goddess? According to me, it is a sin of verbally abusing mother ganga. Please atone for your mistake you have committed
Deleteplease do tell me HOW ganga is holy or sacred... do you even know how much feces, waste, trash is dumped in their everyday?
Deletethe people of the ganga river drink the same water that they pee in and ganga mata cheated on Shantanu, she was a shameless whore & a kutti i hope she gets fucked like nirbhaya did in India
aur tumhe pata he ki kitne paki yo ke stan me pakis logo ko filthy thinking he.
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteAtharva walia, you watch your tongue
ReplyDeleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteBe Atharva walia sounding like vijay mallya, watch your tongue
ReplyDeleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteAtharva walia, dushashan se bade apradi. You tocuha mental eunuch napunsak, ek aur napunsak brihnnala ke piche bhishma ko bano ki shaya me piladi tu
ReplyDeleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletedo not copy the same old big hole bs nonsense text. tum ek paki ho.
Deletenone of these people said bhishma was better they all agreed that he was a namard and a weakling even yudhishthir has defeated bhishma ten times when bhishma hid behind the sons of shree Dhritarashtra
DeleteArjuna and Karna are Atimaharathi as they were sons of Indra and Surya respectively. Both of them are not mere maharathi. Bhishma named by All Pandavas (meaning Arjuna also), Kauravas, Karna, Krishna, Bhagatta, Drupada, 18 akshauhini armies 11 of which fought for duryodhana and 7 for pandavas named Bhishma as the mightiest, best, greatest WARRIOR, not just as an archer. Bhishma just went to Vasu Loka. He actually never just died
ReplyDeleteNone of them were atimaharathis because the term atimaharathi is fanmade and not true. Youre being an idiot like the other fakebharat tards.
Deleteit is not fan made term alright. atimaharathi and mahamaharathi are actually true.
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteArjuna however boasted his warrior abilities whereas Bhishma with utmost humility when asked by Krishna to guide Yudhisthira in how to rule a kingdom said there is nothing he knows that Krishna does not know. Never proud of his warrior abilities.
ReplyDeletewhat humility does Bhisma have? he boasted like a namard kutta when karna insulted him in udyog parva
Deleteyou are a retard for not knowing this
if i am a retard, then what are you? Are you any better than me? At least I do not abuse mahamahim bhishma. You called him a namard kutta. When you speak or type, think a lot if you are being nice or obnoxious, especially about Bhishma pitamah. You aryan history, what do you know about the hisory about the great land of aryavrath? Huh? and that is your name? I mean really?
Deleteand just so you know dogs are actually loyal. Yudhisthira decided not to abandon a dog(actually yama in disguise) and even decided to not enter the gates of heaven alive which people want to enter after death .
Yudhisthira was offered to enter heaven alive if he abandoned the dog but he did not abandon the dog.
So dogs are actually loyal and good animals.
Now whom are you calling a namard?
Do you think you would stand, i mean any chance against the son of Shantanu and Ganga, that ganaputra, devavrata, gangadatta, shantanava, gauranga, shvetaveera, uttama bharatavanshi, that high-souled bhishma pitamah?
His name should be taken with utmost respect. I regard him another name of loyalty, vow, sacrifice, knowledge, strength, humility and devotion.
Before you speak ill words about bhishma pitamah you aryan history, think a lot of times and don't use abusive words against that person. abshab baatein band karon aryan history. bas band karo.
it is difficult to be kind, curtious, respectful when the person against you is refusing to do the same, you are not even honest with any of your comments, you dont have an intention of studying mahabharat, knowing mahabharat, learning the difference between fact, fiction & fanfiction
DeleteYou show your idiocy when you claim all dogs are loyal based on the actions of one dog that traveled with Yudhisthir.
Their are hungry dogs in north korea that eat the flesh of humans. What will your judgement about a DOG be then?
As for aryavarth i know all about its history how it was invaded, plundered, ransacked by racist invaders who worship Vishnu, Indra, Brahma and Hanutati
How the people of modern day India are racist and dont respect dark skin,
shut up atharva walia. You and aryan history, just shut up. Actually, I am honest. Krishna said, Bhishma is no ordinary warrior. Even if Arjuna used all his prowess, strength, power, and the entire knowledge of his divyastras obtained by drona and other various gods, he could not defeat Bhishma, said by Krishna himself and Arjuna admitted it himself.
DeleteSo, do not use abshabd baatein about Mahamahim, Gangaputra, Bhishma Pitamah.
Simple.
End of discussion.
the discussiion ends when you stop being retarded Krishna said Arjuna defeated Shiva he never said anything good about Bhishma
Deleteto the people of aryavarth and mahabharat the kshatriya world this bhishma remained a childless donkey with no offspring, cut off balls namardangi
bhishma was a transgender who mutilated his penis
that was not what bhishma did. Bhishma is not weak.
Deletewhat can one say about arjuna? Ekalavya had his thumb given away, ashwathama was not given complete knowledge, drona rejected karna and if he did not, he would have a life without curses These three people were treated unfairly so Arjuna becomes the best warrior and archer of his generation but the truth is people could smell his BS and his arrogance a mile away. Karna turned out to be better. He had a curse which took his life by unfair means. Karna is considered maharathi and arjuna an atimaharathi. Arjuna is an atimaharathi but so is Karna. THey were the sons of Indra and Surya respectively. Arjuna fought more battles than Karna, that is why Arjuna is named atimaharathi. Bhishma is mahamaharathi accepted by Parashurama, Drona, Shiva, Arjuna, Karna, Krishna, Ganga and all pandavas and kauravas.
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteBhishma had terrible wisdom, invincibility and prowess. He has everlasting fame and many people should try to be humble like him. Despite being a human mahamaharathi, he was humble.
ReplyDeleteHis everlasting ame was limited to the amount of inches he had on his penis, the fart faced bastard Bhishma is not famous,
Deleteno one accepted it kill yourself
DeleteWhy would I kill myself?
Deletebecause bhishma is weak
Deletebhishma was physically and mentally stable.
Deletesab tumhari bate unstable kyu hote hein?
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteCome on Atharva Walia. What happened
ReplyDeletebhishma lost thats what happened
Deletenothing about robbers is mentioned they ran away like pussies from arjuna, just like bhishma ran from shikandi after getting his ass kicked twice by a female
Deleteshut up atharva walia. Arjuna could not defeat ordinary robbers? that explains. Oooohhhh and people call him greatest warrior.
Deleteatm , bhishma never lost. That is what happened
Arjuna did defeat those robbers, i have proved it but you will pretend to not know this, you dont believe anything that you type/text.
DeleteBhishma did lose to normal Srinjaya Rathis that were ranked below Maharathi and Atirathi status.
As for if I COULD DEFEAT BHISHMA then yes i can beat him because Bhishma failed to steer his chariot properly these chariots can be bought from Toy shops TODAY a king in Egypt steered his own chariot while fighting warriors at the same time but Bhishma failed to do that.
Pakistani kids are tougher than bhishma,
ooooooooooooooh. That explains why you hate me?
DeleteWow.
Bhishma can fight millions of soldiers simultaneously. You alone can defeat Bhishma.
Truth is exact opposite.
Bhishma can defeat you.
I totally think he can. I think he can defeat you.
You think you are tough. Even Bhima thought he was tough but Hanuman destroyed his pride, ego, arrogance about power.
Please read that tale.
I really like Bhishma pitamah okay.
Hanuman's ass was lifted up by Kumbhkarn's 2 year old son/boy Nikumbha he lifted Hanuman and threw him at the face of aryan invader Ram, then he raped Hanumans mother Anjana.
DeleteBhim lsot to Hanuman yet the same Bhim defeated Bheeshma in arrow battles.
Bhim lost to Kritavarma who lost to Satyaki
1. Satyaki
2. Kritavarma
3. Hanuman
4. Bhim
5. Bheeshma
6. Parashuram
7. Kartavirya
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteWhat happened? Amba- A foolish woman where Bhishma came for his brother in swayamvar and requested 3 daughters of kashi including her but shalwa came running and all other kings being mad at him but bhishma defended and defated like any powerful man would and and that amba, she could have just told I love shalwa, do not attack him. I do not want to come but she never said that.
ReplyDeleteShikandi was foolish person incarnated amba who wanted to avenge bhishma but she could never do so
Who cares about amba and shikandi you prove that indians have no respect for women and ladies.
DeleteBhishma is a incel in rage, in no way is this namard childless eunuch a powerful man when he was defeated by foot soldiers in a fair fight.
Bhishma was defeated 2 times by Satyaki.
DeleteBhishma was defeated 3 times by Ghatotkatch.
How is Bhishma a good warrior? Cause he defeated Parashuram? THe same Parashuram that would have lost to Dhrishtadyumns pramohan astra?
The shikandi you call a fool is the same shikandi that kicked bhishmas ass twice in fair battles.
Deletethere is no pramohana astra. It is called sammohana astra. Prashwapastra is a weapon that puts people to sleep and known only to bhishma. He possessed narayanastra, brahmasira astra, mohini astra, rudra astra, pashupatastra given by Parashurama whom Shiva gave it to. Bhishma is not an old fart. He was a man of word, man of strength, man of loyalty and more than all that, he was a humble, staunch, and great devotee of lord vishnu and knew the bhagavata dharma
Deletei think aryan history and atharva walia who sounds like vijay mallya are friends
Deleteshikandhi and amba like should have thought that she was the one making a mistake. Bhishma asked permission of princesses if they wanted to come to hastinapura. Amba never revealed she loved king shalva.
Deleteghatotkacha said it is tough to fight bhishma, let alone fight him and even the pandavas, abhimanyu, dhrishtadyumna, drupada, and other prominent warriors of pandava army agreed
Deleteif anyone ever said it is tough to fight bhishma then two conclusions can be made:
Delete1. Either they never fought Bhishma so they say its tough to fight a namard like Bhishma who drunk piss of a kutti like Ganga.
2. Or the easiest answer is they fought against him but felt sorry for the old man so they praised him by saying its difficult to win against a ordinary fighter like him, they felt pity for his age
Just like the boys team in a movie "Chak De India! (2007)" felt sorry for the girls team in that same film so they praised them.
One more reason is that they spared Bhishma's life to distract the Kaurava army so they could easily kill them, this is because Duryodhan would keep Bhishma as the general and anyone who saw Bhishma lose (soldiers of the Kaurav army) would be killed by Pandava warriors.
They gave Bhishma praise so he could keep being incompetent in the battlefield like Mata Ganga & chirkut Satyavati (vyasas mother) were not satisfied with the LUND OF BHISHMAS FATHER SANTANU
hahahahah
and all the things you said are lies as usual becayse you are so jealous.
Deletelooks like that is how the chircuts think. I think you are a namard man
and is pak better than bharatvarsh?
I do not think so man.
and you kutti. Bhishma always drank water. you namard. bhagta kidar here kayar
know anything about hinduism? talk?
or do not talk.
you are clearly from pakistan I think
mujhe lagta he ki ab hame ye discussion band karhi lena chahiye sada sada keliye.
be happy i did not add i and a in it.
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletehttps://www.google.com/search?q=arjuna+memes+maturity&sa=X&bih=617&biw=1366&rlz=1CALFJO_enUS928&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=fa_s501xtuNr2M%252CVT20Kaaq8Jq2JM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kQ2mDkPHQwo3fEM9OyoeULhghZkDQ&ved=2ahUKEwi2m6D33NXtAhVBb60KHVvXBwAQ9QF6BAgKEAE&safe=active&ssui=on&tbs=sur%3Afmc#imgrc=fa_s501xtuNr2M
ReplyDeleteClick on images. THat is true prowess of Arjuna LOL, LMAO
Atharva walia, what happened
your north indian mentality cant accept that bhishma was a weak warrior and this is the reason for caste system continuing in india, the country with the biggest amount of slaves, you will always remain a slave
Deleteand I do not think your brain cannot accept bhishma was a great warrior
Deleteand I do not live in india just so you know
Deleteu clearly are an indian or descended from indians or a non-indian that refuses to admit bhishma's flaws because you dont know the truth
Deletesince u dont know anything it would be better for u to kill urself then i wont insult you as much
aur tum ek pakistani?
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteShresht banne ki kamna mat karo, uttam banne ka try karo. Samja? Nahi Samajme aaya?
ReplyDeletei only understand how india lost two wars to pakistan (abhinandan & kargil) and was defeated by sri lanka
Deletehow aryans invaded india and took a shit on hanumans face three times
aryan history what history do you know about the great land of aryavrat which was called bharatvarsh after king bharat and is now called hindustan and india.
Deletenobody took s word on hanuman's face alright.
Deleteatharva walia and aryan history, where are you?
Deleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletehttps://www.google.com/search?q=arjuna+memes+maturity&sa=X&bih=617&biw=1366&rlz=1CALFJO_enUS928&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=fa_s501xtuNr2M%252CVT20Kaaq8Jq2JM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kQ2mDkPHQwo3fEM9OyoeULhghZkDQ&ved=2ahUKEwi2m6D33NXtAhVBb60KHVvXBwAQ9QF6BAgKEAE&safe=active&ssui=on&tbs=sur%3Afmc#imgrc=fa_s501xtuNr2M
ReplyDeleteClick on images. THat is true prowess of Arjuna according to me. LOL, LMAO
i cant click them cause their is not a link but it is true that arjunas prowess is better than shivas
Deletehow can the prowess of arjuna be more than that of shiva's prowess?
Deleteits more than shiva's prowess because shiva was not the best, he is only superior to average warriors like vishnu and hanuman
Deletebut shiva is below Indra & Kuber
Shiva had 11 forms called "Rudras" they united and lost to Meghanad before he defeated Bhishma's clan (Vasu) & the son Indra known as "Jayant" he then captured Indra himself.
It shows that you really need to do your research.
shiva> Arjuna. Just stop it man. Stop it.
DeleteJust learn to stop.
Oh, even though Indrajit defeated Indra and Arjuna defeated nivatakavachas whom indra could not defeat, even if they team up,
I think Bhishma would totally destroy both of them even if they are atimaharathi.
Learn to understand that Indrajit defeated Shiva, and Arjuna defeated Shiva too youre not being honest or you just like to be an ignorant uneducated fucktard
Deletebhishma would totally destroy them. shiva is one of the trimurti and you are saying he would be defeated. So you from
DeleteNo comments.
maybe you do not know how to respect people. Also, I took screenshots of you abusing me and swearing me.
Bhishma would expose, destroy you just like a volcano erupts and there is a lot of carnage. You aint tough. If you said this in front of pitamah. toh woh sambhavta tumari yeh kehne par, tumhari ye jeeb kathleta
but I am not as nice as Bhishma pitamah. and I have screenshots of the posts you put that includes bad words.
Deleteso better talk nice to me man.
and I can report you.
so just stop talking bad words.
simple.
end of discussion and you said you are from a country that starts with p right.
hummmmmm.
and u said indians are invaders uh.
okay buddy.
and you said hahaha to me.
you impotent man.
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
DeleteTHis is true statement with resources cited
ReplyDeleteYes it is true, and hanuman was also a overrated weak bastard like karna, bhishma, parshurama & laxman/balram etc.
Deletekartikeya vs bhishma okay
ReplyDeletekartikey was defeated by:
Delete1) arjun in khandav daha (adi parva)
2) ravan in ramayan
3) jalandhar, andhak in purans
4) pakistans elite miltiary squad
bhishma according to me never got defeated alright. yeah. now everybody stop it
ReplyDeleteyou show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deletethe author, please delete this. we should know bhishma is just someone else. I mean he is that great as a warrior and as a human being. He was a mahamaharathi.
ReplyDeleteur too obsessed and now you want someone who dared to tell the truth to delete this beautiful post?
Deleteyou should kill yourself
your mentality, racism, discrimination, bhakti is hateful towards facts and the truth about bhishma being a weak warrior worthless than the tati of the brave men that raped NIRBHAYA
Why would I do what you said uh?
ReplyDeleteI do not show racism.
you show racism as you hate pakistanis, arjuna, satyaki, abhimanyu all cause they kicked your ugly bheeshma pitamahs ass he was never called "mahahim" in actual authentic versions of mahabharat, you act retarded and fart alot and you ae a disgrace to the human race, your entir elife revoles around this weak ugly fart-face son of ganga called Bhishma, he got his ass kicked by king virat, prince Dhrishtadyumn, prince Satyaki but you refuse to see it, you are only skilled in spamming and farting the first time u masturbated was when you saw a photo of bhishma, you beg me to delete this post and blog but you dont ask any karna tard to delete their posts about arjuna, bhima, satyaki etc, you are showing your biasedness and hypocrisy your unwillingness to accept any flaws in your argument, claim, reasoning, your bhishma supported slavery and was ugly like your father with a 2 inch dick, all indians have small penises because of the bad inbred genes that namard like u spread kill yourself
Deleteme apne apko kaiku maaru walia kahike?
ReplyDeletenone of these people said bhishma was better they all agreed that he was a namard and a weakling even yudhishthir has defeated bhishma ten times when bhishma hid behind the sons of shree Dhritarashtra
Deleteactually then did you walia.
DeleteBhishma never fought with his full strength that's why all pandavas are thought that they was undefeated 😂 ........ Remember when pitamah was came to fight with all fatal skill and power then what's happened ✌🏻
ReplyDelete🤣🤣🤣 bhishma did fight with his full strength and one baby from pakistan tackled him and kicked parshurams teeth out and fucked the mother of hanuman
DeleteLogical stupid astra
DeleteNot logical, It should be Useless Astra with zero knowledge
ReplyDeletepakistan defeated bhishma twice
Delete