Their were many who could defeat Hanuman. He is not invincible or a deity.
Regarding Mahabharata characters many of them were Kshatriyas/Brahmanas who were superior to gods in battle.
Ashwathama was a avatar of Shiva, i think he could easily defeat Hanuman.
Hanuman has incredible feats of strength he did lift a mountain peak, but Indra lifted whole mountains, and this Indra lost to Arjuna.
Hanuman’s boons are also not infallible, he was wounded by Ravan’s son Trishira, proving that Hanuman can still be injured by weapons.
“Hurt by the thrust of the sword, the valiant Hanuma the son of wind-god, struck Trishira on his breast, with his palm.”
I know Hanuman killed Trishira but this quote is not about that, about who is stronger its about boons failing, it is proof that Hanuman can be wounded easily by a sword.
I don’t know if Ramayana says that Hanuman tore his chest, but if it does then that means that Hanuman’s boon did not work because he injured himself.
These are some warriors who could defeat Hanuman. They are not Devtas. They’re Kshatriyas and Brahmanas (who still fought).
- Arjuna
- Abhimanyu
- Ashwathama
- Bhagadatta
- Drona
- Durvasa (he had a chariot and abducted Rukmini infront of Krishna).
- Dhrishtadyumna (he had the Brahmastra)
- Yudhishthira (because of brahmastra)
- Kekaya king Brihatkshatra
Because he was also a user of the brahmastra. This weapon was used by Meghanada in Sundara Kanda to subdue Hanuman.
In Yuddha Kanda Meghanada used ordinary arrows to defeat Hanuman.
“Indrajit the wielder of a great bow smacked the chest-region of Jambavan with an arrow and released ten arrows towards Hanuman, the swift monkey. Indrajit, that strong and highly courageous demons, pierced those jewels among the monkeys there with his arrows which resembled flames of fire and began to shout in triumph. Indrajit, full of joy and victorious in conflict, returned to Lanka, spreading happiness among the demons.”
This is a fair defeat, Hanuman is commonly believed by people to be stronger than he actually is.
Draupadi was never unfaithful to the Pandavas (her husbands) she only loved them:
ReplyDeleteDraupadi exclaimed, "As I have never, from intoxication of the senses, been unfaithful to my husbands even at heart, by that Truth, O wretch, I shall behold thee dragged and lying powerless on the ground."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04015.htm
Draupadi had a childhood:
"Surely, I must, in my childhood, have committed act highly offensive to Dhatri through whose displeasure, O bull of the Bharata race, I have been visited with such consequences. Mark, O son of Pandu, the pallour that hath come over my complexion which not even a life in the woods fraught as it was with extreme misery, could bring about. Thou, O Pritha's son, knowest what happiness, O Bhima, was formerly mine. Even, I, who was such have now sunk into servitude. Sorely distressed, I can find no rest."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04020.htm
During the Pandava's childhood Draupadi was a child:
"King Pandu was the dear friend of Drupada and was regarded by him as his counterself. And Drupada had all along cherished the desire of bestowing this daughter of his upon Pandu as his daughter-in-law. Ye heroes of features perfectly faultless, king Drupada hath all along cherished this desire in his heart that Arjuna of strong and long arms might wed this daughter of his according to the ordinance."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01196.htm
Draupadi only came in public twice (dice game and swayamvar not rajasuya):
"Alas, only once before, on the occasion of the Swayamvara, I was beheld by the assembled kings in the amphitheatre, and never even once beheld afterwards. I am to-day brought before this assembly. She whom even the winds and the sun had seen never before in her palace is to-day before this assembly and exposed to the gaze of the crowd. Alas, she whom the sons of Pandu could not, while in her palace, suffer to be touched even by the wind, is to-day suffered by the Pandavas to be seized and dragged by this wretch."
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m02/m02068.htm
Gaydeep pilwa again spreading false information Namard
ReplyDeletegaywat gupta was used as a toilet seat by nikumbh who defeated hanuman
Deletehanuman sucks
DeleteTeri maa ki chud sucks lavde gaand maara kutte ke pille pakistani pata kuch hota nahi gyaan chodta hai brihu fan 🤣
Deleteyour family tree fucked itself more than the royal bloodline of great britain and you urself are a namard coward and randi ka bachcha like hanuman who lost in a fight with pakistani kids and children and bachcha
DeleteMadarchod Bhenkeloda Gando ki aulad
ReplyDeletetu apni randi maa ki tati kaa apne bhadve baap tha lund choos
DeleteHanuman lived a celibate lifestyle because he was impotent his father kesari chopped the balls of hanuman off when he found out how meghanad kicked his ass.
ReplyDelete