Friday, May 19, 2023

Putting an end to the Hanumana topic (part 2).

Intro - This post is a follow up to the previous post:
https://logicastra.blogspot.com/2021/11/putting-end-to-hanumana-topic-part-1.html (this was a "link" to it).

Starting it again.
In this post i am going to prove 3 important things, hanuman was not a bhagwan/avatar of shiva. And hanuman is no match for Arjuna. In addition to that i will be showing how Ashwathama is greater than hanutati.
=
He was never called a "god" in any of the books, parva's or chapters of either main source (Mahabharat/Ramayana).
1: Debunking the claims of him being a Rudravtar.
Here's the quote i refer too:
"Aja, Ekapada, Ahivradhna, the unvanquished Pinakin, Rita, Pitrirupa, the three-eyed Maheswara, Vrishakapi, Sambhu, Havana, and Iswara--these are the celebrated Rudras, eleven in number, who are the lords of all the worlds."
=
[second quoTE]
"And the sons of Sthanu, gifted with great energy, were, it is known, eleven. They were Mrigavayadha, Sarpa, Niriti of great fame: Ajaikapat, Ahivradhna, and Pinaki, the oppressor of foes; Dahana and Iswara, and Kapali of great splendour; and Sthanu, and the illustrious Bharga. These are called the eleven Rudras."
[2nd completion]
ultimate conclusion - your hanutati or Hanuman was not among the mighty Rudras.
a slap on the face of every hanubhakt
2: Debunking the claims involving a quote in Mahabharat.
The quote hanubhakt's used;
"Thou art the mighty ape Hanuman that aided Vishnu in the incarnation of Rama in his expedition against Ravana."
My debunk starts again.
From checking the link any logical person would realise that its an exaggeration because it labels every single thing as "Shiva" which is simply not true as Ravan, Ram were their own personal individuals, they were not fragments, particles, or portions of Shiva, neither was this overrated comedian named Hanuman.
Shiva is considered the Navgrahs:
Thou art Chandramas, thou art Surya, thou art the planet Saturn, thou art the descending node (of the moon), thou art the ascending node, thou art Mangala (Mars), and thou art Vrihaspati (Jupiter) and Sukra (Venus), thou art Vudha (Mercury) thou art the worshipper of Atri's wife, thou art he who shot his shaft in wrath at Sacrifice when Sacrifice fled away from him in the form of a deer.
Shiva is considered the avatar of Vishnu;
 Thou art Vamana (the dwarf) who deceived the Asura chief Vali (and depriving him of his sovereignty restored it unto Indra). Thou art the Yogin crowned with success (like Sanatkumara and others). Thou art a great Rishi (like Vasishtha and others).
Balram was considered a avatar of Shiva;
Thou art possessed of might that is always well spent. Thou art he who had assumed the form of Valarama (the elder brother of Krishna)."
Here he was also called "lowest of each devta".
[quote start'sThou art he that acts. Thou wearest clothes whose warp and woof are made of snakes. Thou art Supreme. Thou art he who is the lowest of the celestials. [end quote]
Even a book was called "ansh of shiva";
"Thou art the Mahabharata and other histories of the kind. Thou art the treatises called Mimansa. Thou art Gautama (the founder of the science of dialectics). Thou art the author of the great treatise on Grammar that has been named after the Moon."
Kuber and Indra were labelled as Shiva's avatar:
"Thou art the highest form of felicity. Thou art a deity proud of his might. Thou art Sakra." (quoTE 1) "Thou art the king of the Yakshas, called Kuvera, who is thy inseparable associate and who is the Lord of all treasures in the world. Thou art Dhatri. Thou art Sakra." (quOTe 2)
Commentary - No one ever calls Balram, Indra, Kuber a avatar of Shiva. People of india only talk about hanuman, hanuman and hanuman that's it. If even a book can be called "Shiva" then i think its safe to say that the meaning is that this is all an exaggeration to show how important Shiva is meaning that hanuman, indra, balram and kuber were not avatars, anshas or portions. They have no relation to eachother at all.

Another reference in Mahabharat (canon source material) says that Agnidev was a portion of Shiva or was another name for Shiva:
"The Rishis describe Mahadeva as Agni, and Sthanu, and Maheswara; as one-eyed, and three-eyed, of universal form, and Siva or highly auspicious."
---------------------------------
Reasons for Ashwathama being a better warrior than hanutati.
Vajra
Brahmastra
Indrastra
Aindraastra
Narayanastra
Many many other weapon's for example the brahmasira.
I dont need to give evidence for this because of the simple fact that most readers of this blog already know that Ashwathama had access to all of of these weapon's but i will give evidence for everything else because that matters more to me.
If anyone wants me to build a respect thread for him later on i can do that but im sticking with Hanumanji for now.
--------------------------------------------------------
Why Arjuna is better than Hanuman.
1) His punch's were as tough as a Vajra's impact:
"The illustrious Arjuna then, taking up his bow and dragging the Kirata with his bow-string, struck him some fierce blows that descended like thunderbolts."
"The mighty son of Pritha then, his mouth smoking with wrath, struck the invincible god in the form of a Kirata, with hi clenched fists, blows that descended like thunderbolts."
What happened to hanuman when he was struck by a Vajra:
"Then, your left cheekbone, zygomatic arch, is broken." [4-66-24] "Then on observing that you are mutilated, highly infuriated is that scent-wafter Air-god." [4-66-25]
IN A FIST FIGHT/BOXING MATCH ARJUN WOULD ANYDAY BEAT HANUMAN.
Also - dont say that your hanutati was a child, the fact is that being from the race of vanars this hanumans power remained the same that it was at birth, kumbhkarn a rakshasa was extremely young when he defeated indra, so this hanuman being a child is not a valid point.
Arjun, Kumbhkarn, Indra had better physical strength than behenchod hanumanji.
The following is a series of quote's and link's to the other weapons Arjun could use to beat Hanuman, this first one was just to prove that Arjun could win against Hanutati even if he was a unarmed fighter.

2) Arjun has the mace of Yama:
"The mace I wield incapable of being baffled by any body. With this weapon thou wilt achieve great deeds." "Received from Yama that weapon duly, along with the Mantras and rite, and the mysteries of hurling and withdrawing it."

3) He defeated elite chariot-warriors:
"Then Partha, encompassed by those great car-warriors, and beholding his car assailed and Keshava attacked in that manner became filled with rage, and overthrew a large number of car-warriors and foot-soldiers."
Proving they were elite's;
"I heard that the Maharatha Sansaptakas of our army appointed for the overthrow of Arjuna were all slain by Arjuna himself."
Hanuman was thrashed by foot soldiers:
"That Hanuma, then being beaten with sticks and fists by the cruel demons, was dragged to the vicinity of Ravana. Then, recognizing that Hanuma, tied with barks of trees and ropes."

Hanuman got dragged around like a toy.
"That Ravana, who was endowed with an extraordinary energy, saw Hanuma the foremost of monkeys, being dragged hither and thither by demons of ugly countenance."
Definition of "drag"; pull (someone or something) along forcefully, roughly

4) Arjun has the Pasupatastra:
This has already been discussed, everyone who knows about Arjuns fight with Shiva also knows he has this weapon.
Hanuman never had any weapon besides ordinary tree's, rocks and stone. Do not believe in fake stories about him using a mace or wielding a club, their are only 2 authentic source's where he was involved in (Mahabharat/Ramayana) neither show him using such a weapon.

5) Arjuna was able to defeat Yadava's:
"That hero of immeasurable splendour who having vanquished single-handed the assembled Yadavas in battle, ravished Subhadra with the consent of Vasudeva."

6) Arjuna defeated the Gandharvas:
"Without him who having gone towards the north had vanquished mighty Gandharva chiefs by hundreds."

7) Arjuna owned the Sammohan arrow, that makes anyone fall unconscious and go to sleep, so hanuman will be vulnerable and defenceless.
"Wielder of the Gandiva who was capable of enduring all foes, evolved another irresistible weapon obtained from Indra, called Sanmohana. And entirely covering the cardinal and other directions with sharp and keen-edged arrows furnished with beautiful feathers, that mighty hero stupefied their senses."
8) Arjuna meditated before he was ever at his peak or prime as a warrior, his spirit energy was so potent that it began to heat the whole earth:
"Son of pritha possessed of great energy is engaged in the most difficult of ascetic austerities on the breast of the Himavat. Heated with his asceticism, the earth is smoking all round, O god of gods. We do not know what his object is for which he is engaged in these austerities. He, however, is causing us pain."
If Hanuman ever did something called "tapasya" i bet no one would feel pain at all.

9) Arjun could negate one million arrows in a split second (he did so during the tenth day):
[quote"The kings (in that army) quickly sped at Dhananjaya's car myriads upon myriads and millions upon millions of arrows furnished with peacock feathers. Partha, however, checking those arrows by means of his own arrowy showers, began to send those mighty car-warriors to Yama's abode." [end quote].
Analyzing it; first the kings fired a million arrows then Arjun negated all of those arrow's, to do this he would need to at least shoot one million back at them. This was in a few seconds.

Hanuman was a victim of ten arrows from Meghanad:
"Indrajit the wielder of a great bow...........released ten arrows towards Hanuman."
Point being that
hanuman FAILED to counter them or react to them in time, he could not even dodge those arrows.

This show's the clear difference between these warriors.
-----------------------------------
WRAP UP.
In terms of reaction speed, timing, reflexe's and physical strength, along with versatility etc & variety it is obvious that Arjun would own Hanuman infinity time's, their is no way a lightweight kutta like hanutati would last more than 10 seconds against Arjuna.

If hanutards want to talk about his boon then they need to check the proper source, this fudhu hanuman was injured many times he is not immune to damage by battle, his power never increased after Indra one shotted him.
In combat Hanuman is weak compared to his fellow vanars, all vanars were vulnerable to de@th by Brahmastra.

Before you call me "biased Arjuna fan" understand that i am against most arjun fan's because they have respect for hanuman/hanutati.

Bottom line; dont compare this harami pawansut maruti hanumana to a real man like Arjuna.

Foot soldier's are better fighters than Hanuman, like Duryodhan was more brave than Hanuman's entire family.
Arjun was better than Laxman.
While Hanuman was nothing compared to Arjun in physical strength, intelligence, versatility etc.
Heirarchy;
"Shiva" "Arjuna" "Krishna" [Mard-tier]
"Ashwathama" "Indra" "Ram" "Bhagdatt" "Drona" "Ravan" "Satyaki[Top-tier]
"Parshuram" "Bhishma" "Karna" "Ghatotkatch" "Kritvarma" "Dhrishtadyumn" [Mid-tier]
"Nakula" "Yudhisthir" "Sugreev" "Vali" [Low-tier]
"Foot-Soldier's" [weak-tier]
"pawan pootra hanumanji" [namard - tier]
"elephants that were inferior to hanutati" [fodder level].

Thats how the list goes, hanuman is low.

24 comments:

  1. Duhsasan, Yuyutsu, Somadatta could kill Hanuman in one second

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sakuni would beat up hanuman's mother anjana first, then he cut hanumans head off with his mighty sword.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Teri maka bhosda agar tune comment delete kiya to

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. u only feel insulted because the truth about Hanuman was told to you through this blog post
      by the way if Hanuman had to choose anyone to protect then he would choose me not you

      If you are Shaswat or if you are another person then I AM CERTAIN that you will never be able to win a debate against me. I clearly know alot more about the 2 authentic epics.

      You might call me a ravan tard but i ask you WHAT RAVAN TARD/FAN makes a post glorifying Vali and another post glorifying Sahastrarjun?

      i can easily respond to you with abusive language but i like to do different things and one of those things is defeat you without any insult's, vulgar language etc

      maybe just hanuman lost a fight is enough to tick you off, enough to make u feel insulted

      Delete
    2. Kuch bhi likhe ga toh terko har koi chutiya hi bolega

      Delete
    3. just like hanumana is worthless than my tati so are you

      Delete
    4. too pussy to reply back i see like hanuman was too scared to fight foot soldiers

      Delete
  5. Thanks for sharing this useful content about the best car rentals services from Delhi to Agra Taxi/Cab with discounted rates available 24/7 support for the tourists. If you want to get more details about Agra to Jaipur booking with best prices at owic.in.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What nonsense. Hanuman is strongest among strongest.

    1. Bhima was unable to even move Hanuman's tail.

    2. Hanuman single handedly crushed 80,000 kimkaras, Jambumali, prince Aksha, 100s of other rakshasas etc in Lanka.

    3. In Sundara Kanda, Ravana says that Hanuman is superior than Vali, sugriva etc in speed, energy, strength etc.

    4. When Hanuman travelled to Himalayas, his speed was stated to have surpassed even Garuda.

    5. He travelled a 1000 yojanas from Lanka to Himalayas and back without any exhaustion.

    6. He can increase and decrease his size as much as he want.

    7. He managed to injure Rava a by striking him with his palm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will explain to you the truth my son.
      1 - Hanuman met Bheem in kmg mahabharat when bheem was exhausted, blood was dripping from his injuries and wounds after fighting the yakshas sent by Kubera (a true god unlike hanutati). So he's not at full power.

      1A - Bheem could have easily moved hanuman if he wanted too but a illusionary trick was used to make Bheem fail so he would be more alert in wars, the point of their meeting was to teach bheem a lesson to not be over confident.

      1B - As per Indonesian Mahabharat (which is older than kmg, as the scripts were traded with them long before arrival of british settler's and looters) all that happened between them is that when Bhima met Hanutati then he kicked hanuman in the face. So Bhima actually won.

      1C - their are CROSS REFERENCES in kmg's mahabharat, which state that Bhima actually defeated hanuman & all yakshas combined, its said by souti and dhritrashtra in adi parva (though it happened in vana parva).

      2 - hanuman's achievements were exaggerated, even in sundara kandam its mentioned and admitted by hanutati HIMSELF that aksha kumar was superior and a better fighter than hanuman, he did not crush 80 thousand people at all, its a fake exaggerated claim.

      Delete
    2. Hello i will also debunk you and ur bull shit comments that were made in defence of hanutati's reputation.

      3 - This accolade of ravan praising hanuman is mentioned two times in sundara kanda and yuddha kandam but it is not meant to be taken literally at all.
      Even sri krishna exaggerated the power of Shalya as being greater than parshuram, bheem & bhishma even better than arjuna yet we all know it was a lie. So ravan praising hanuman is not factual.

      And ravan himself insulted mata seetha and lord ram various times, do not take his words seriously.

      4 - hanuman's speed being equal to garood means he is good at running away from the pakistanis that tackled abhinandan to the floor and the muscular women that slapped hanuman's father vayu dev.

      Garuda himself was defeated very easily by dwapar era fighters and characters so he is weak in my eyes.

      Delete
    3. to adress your next crap points
      5th - Hanuman was exhausted by a mere punch from ravan, so him not being exhausted after traveling for a yojana is a BS in itself.
      Hanutati also got exhausted when he had nothing to eat for a whole DAY in kishkinda kanda, he is clearly being overrated by you, he admitted he was going to die of thirst.

      6th - Their is only a BS claim made by hanutati himself that he could increase or decrease his size the TRUTH is he never does that in ramayan or mahabharat.

      7th - the performances of jatayu and suparswa against ravan surpassed anything hanutati did, so they were superior to hanutati too not just ravana being better than hanutati.

      so the REAL NONSENSE has been done by hanutati bhakts

      Delete
    4. 1. KMG mahabharata is filled with interpolations. BORI is way more authentic and in it, a healthy and fresh Bhima failed miserably in front of Hanuman.

      2. Indonesian mahabharata is a 12th century text and most of it could just be creative liberty by Indonesian writers. Most Indian manuscripts used to create BORI are older than 11th century. Nepali manuscripts which are free from invasions also supports Indian version.

      3. Hanuman managed to knock Ravana unconscious with a hit after Ravana defeated Lakshmana using Brahma's spear.

      4. Hanuman's claim of being able to change size as he wishes is never contradicted. So it's a legitimate claim.

      5. Garuda thrashed all of the gods in heaven and even Indra's vajra couldn't do anything to Garuda. Garuda is also immortal. Garuda will one shot most of Mahabharata warriors.

      6. Hanuman's feats in sundara Kanda are all legitimate and has cross references.

      Delete
    5. The man who beat hanuman up and slapped him.Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 10:25:00 PM PDT

      1A - BORI CE Mahabharat mentions that Shiva was defeated by Arjuna 4 times. So judge for yourself then and u will be a laughing stock, the truth is KMG beats BORI any day.

      1B - And the explanation about bheems meeting with hanutati was already GIVEN by me clearly that bheem had a meeting with a yaksha army first and was weakened by it and that indonesian mahabharat mentioned they only kicked eachother.

      Hanutati was lifted by many individuals so him being defeated by bheem is what happened.

      2 - You are illiterate so you dont get that BORI came six decades recently in the 1960s, not in the 11th century, so fuck you.

      3 - hanutati did a sneak attack when ravan was focusing on lifting laxman, he also did it with maya's spear not brahma's so another blunder by you. And ravan clearly defeated that gandu hanuman fairly.

      4 - hanuman never had the power to change his size but he did run away when Pakistani's kicked him.

      5 - Your claims about garood are clearly headcanon & fanfiction so take the middle finger again.

      6 - hanuman was defeated 10 times by warriors in sundara kanda even akshay kumar being superior to hanutati is a fact so stop lying

      Delete
    6. 1. Are you dumb. BORI is prepared in 1960s using the ancient manuscripts collected from all of India and Nepal. Most of these manuscripts are centuries old.

      2. The footnote in BORI clearly explains in Khandava parva that Shiva mentioned there is a general term rather than referring to Mahadeva. The other mention by Krishna is a translation error by Bibek Debroy and not a problem by BORI.

      3. The use of Brahma's spear and Mayas spear are two different incidents. Read Ramayana properly.

      4. Even Pandava footsoldiers will kick Pakistan's ass.

      5.the feats of Garuda are clearly described in Mahabharata. Maybe you should try reading it.

      6. Hanuman crushed Akshaya like a bug and so did he crushed numerous other Lanka warriors.

      Delete
    7. 1 - The person whose really dumb is U not ME that is a fact. Cause Aksha was praised by ur own helpless chutiya the impotent devta HANUTATI himself mentioned in Sundara Kanda that Akshay KUmar was a better fighter than Hanuman himself, so dont ever spout bullshit like hanutati defeated aksha at all, aksha will always be ranked above hanuman, and hanuman will always be inferior to pakistanis.

      2 - Bori Mahabharat is not the most authentic at all, it mentioned Shiva losing to Arjuna, the footnotes were never authentic or canon, it has been discussed many times that no footnote is a part of the epic, its an opinion of the translater/scholar who wants to give their own two cent's so stop your lying dumbass.

      3 - In both incidents that Ravan used that spear he kicked laxman's ass and slapped hanuman with his lund, so stop barking like a behenchod.

      4 - Pakistanis still have more balls than the coward hanuman who let his own mother get raped by ravan (punjiksthala was hanutati's mother) and then left seetha alone helpless in front of ravan, so pakistan is better than hanuman, they respect women.

      The rest is instantly negated, u are a weak debater and all u are doing is getting smacked around like hanuman, parshuram, bhishma & karna did in their lifespans.

      And just like them you are a little bitch.

      Delete
    8. As usual hanuman bhakts are cowards who cant reply back after they have been defeated in a debate, the proper name of hanuman is Hanutati.

      Delete
    9. HAHAHAH! hanuman bhakts still run away like namards

      hanutati was never a match for any foot soldier

      Delete
  7. Is this a scarsam or you may be mad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it cant be sarcasm rather the post is filled with facts
      please stop overrating hanutati

      Delete
  8. Thanks for sharing this useful content about the best car rentals services from Delhi to Agra Taxi/Cab with discounted rates available 24/7 support for the tourists. If you want to get more details about Agra to Jaipur booking with best prices at owic.in.

    ReplyDelete

?