Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Who broke the rules of war 1st?

Rules are described/narrated in the bhishma parva day 1 or before in that parva.
Quote:
"Then the Kurus, the Pandavas, and the Somakas made certain covenants, and settled the rules, O bull of Bharata's race, regarding the different kinds of combat. Persons equally circumstanced must encounter each other, fighting fairly. And if having fought fairly the combatants withdraw (without fear of molestation), even that would be gratifying to us. Those who engaged in contests of words should be fought against with words."
"Those that left the ranks should never be slain. A car-warrior should have a car-warrior for his antagonist; he on the neck of an elephant should have a similar combatant for his foe; a horse should be met by a horse, and a foot-soldier, O Bharata; should be met by a foot-soldier. Guided by considerations of fitness, willingness, daring and might, one should strike another, giving notice. No one should strike another that is unprepared or panic-struck."
"One engaged with another, one seeking quarter, one retreating, one whose weapon is rendered unfit, uncased in mail, should never be struck. Car-drivers, animals (yoked to cars or carrying weapons) men engaged in the transport of weapons, players on drums and blowers of conches should never be struck. Having made these covenants, the Kurus, and the Pandavas, and the Somakas wondered much, gazing at each other."

The speech said by overrated Karna before his death in karna parva.
Quote;
He said these words, "O Partha, O Partha, wait for a moment, that is, till I lift this sunken wheel. Beholding, O Partha, the left wheel of my car swallowed through accident by the earth, abandon (instead of cherishing) this purpose (of striking and slaying me) that is capable of being harboured by only a coward. Brave warriors that are observant of the practices of the righteous, never shoot their weapons at persons with dishevelled hair, or at those that have turned their faces from battle, or at a Brahmana, or at him who joins his palms, or at him who yields himself up or beggeth for quarter or at one who has put up his weapon, or at one whose arrows are exhausted, or at one whose armour is displaced, or at one whose weapon has fallen off or been broken! Thou art the bravest of men in the world. Thou art also of righteous behaviour, O son of Pandu! Thou art well-acquainted with the rules of battle. For these reasons, excuse me for a moment, that is, till I extricate my wheel, O Dhananjaya, from the earth. Thyself staying on thy car and myself standing weak and languid on the earth, it behoveth thee not to slay me now. Neither Vasudeva, nor thou, O son of Pandu, inspirest me with the slightest fear. Thou art born in the Kshatriya order. Thou art the perpetuator of a high race. Recollecting the teachings of righteousness, excuse me for a moment, O son of Pandu!"
https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08090.htm
Logic - that means that cause during the jayadrath vadha chapter bheems arrows were exhausted Karna should not have attacked him with arrows.
Group attack vs Bhima (day 1):
"And roaring like a deep mass of clouds, and assuming an awful form, that hero frightened thy sons and fell upon them. Thereupon the brothers thy sons Duryodhana, and Durmukha and Dussaha, and that mighty car-warrior Dussasana, and Durmarshana, O king, and Vivingsati, and Chitrasena, and the great car-warrior Vikarna and also Purumitra, and Jaya, and Bhoja, and the valorous son of Somadatta, shaking their splendid bows like masses of clouds exhibiting the lightning's flashes, and taking out (of their quivers) long arrows resembling snakes that have just cast off their sloughs."
"Surrounded that mighty bowman rushing (towards them) covering him with flights of arrows like the clouds shrouding the sun. And the (five) sons of Draupadi, and the mighty car-warrior Saubhadra, and Nakula, and Sahadeva, and Dhrishtadyumna of Prishata's race, rushed against (those) Dhartarashtras, tearing them with whetted shafts like summits of mountains with the impetuous bolts of heaven. And in that first encounter characterised by the awful twang of bow-strings and their flapping against the leathern fences (of the warriors) no combatant, either on thy side or that of the foe, turned back."
Detail's; Here the kouravas began the rule breaking trend. Before any pandava warrior came to interfere these 12 warrior's (eleven were kourava princes, one was a son to Somadatta) ganged up on Bheem it was clearly cheating. How could a unbiased reader claim the first side to break rules was the pandav army?
Adding the other warriors still it was just 9 characters who aided Bheem that too only after he was attacked. So the pandav side was outnumbered it remains a group attack.
Rules broken by Vrihadvala (in his fight with Abhimanyu).
Quote;
"The mighty bowman Abhimanyu battled with Vrihadvala. Soon, however, in that encounter, O king, the ruler of Kosala cut off the standard and overthrew the charioteer of Subhadra's son. The son of Subhadra then upon the overthrow of his charioteer, was filled with wrath and pierced Vrihadvala, O king, with nine shafts, and with a couple of sharp arrows that grinder of foes also cut off (Vrihadvala's) standard, and with one (more) cut off one of the protectors of his car-wheels and with the other his charioteer. And those chastisers of foes continued to weaken each other with sharp arrows."
According to the laws previously explained the charioteer's were supposed to be given special treatment so they should never be struck or attacked. You can read that obviously the first warrior to hit a chariot driver was Vrihadvala (descendant of Raam) not Abhimanyu (son of shri Subhadra).
So this's the 2nd time that army (kouravas led by gandu bhishma) broke ethics, rules & laws of combat.

Also if we take this further back then during Adi Parva the kouravas together with Karna/Yuyutsu (102 chariot-fighter's in total) fought 2 people (Drupada/Satyajeet) unless you include pancala citizens so it was clearly adharma/cheating. After doing such a cowardly act these kouravas should never expect a fair fight.

Or in Ramayana it was cheating when Wiraadh was forced to fight a 2 vs 1 battle alone, him by himself up-against Laxman/Raam or the fights of Kabandha/Viswavasu were just as unfair. Readers/fanclubs often forget that the vanaras always did group attacks against Meghanada during Yuddh Kanda. Yet he gets immense hatred from hindus (cause he defeated 3 stooges/fudhu-harami character's). Even Atikaya was a victim of a vanar group attack, but never did a single vanara earn the label of "KAYAR" "Crook warrior" 'coward" "namard" etc. Because people have a bias/favoritism.

No comments:

Post a Comment

?