Intro - i am using both puran's and ramayan in this post to come to conclusions, i dont like purans or believe they have any authenticity but i use them because i want to show the negative things purans will state about the fan favorite warrior's/fighters (vishnu, hanutati, parshurama etc).
Proof that Ravan actually won this time.
Quote;
Indra was conquered by means of his Aiśvarya (power and prosperity). So also Viṣṇu, the omnipresent one. By worshipping and propitiating the Liṅga, all the three worlds were controlled by him. At that time, all the groups of Suras, with Brahmā and Viṣṇu as their leaders, gathered together on the top of Mem and began their deliberation and discussion:
"We have been tormented by Rāvaṇa through his penance, very difficult to be performed (by others)."
{End}
[Full quote]
He was made the great king and ruler of Trikūṭa by Maheśa. He occupied the greatest and most excellent position (seat) among Rākṣasas. It was for testing (the enduring capacity of) the sages that he harassed them. Violence towards the sages was indulged in, O Brāhmaṇas, by Rāvaṇa who was himself an ascetic, only because he wanted to test them. Rāvaṇa who made the whole world cry and scream, became great and invincible. Thanks to the grace and favour of Śaṅkara, another creation was evolved by him.
The guardians of the worlds were conquered by that ascetic by means of his valour. Brahmā too was subdued by him only through great penance. By becoming the nectar-rayed one, he conquered the Moon, O Brāhmaṇas. Through the power of burning, the Fire-god was conquered and Īśa (himself) was conquered by lifting up Kailāsa (mountain). Indra was conquered by means of his Aiśvarya (power and prosperity). So also Viṣṇu, the omnipresent one. By worshipping and propitiating the Liṅga, all the three worlds were controlled by him.
At that time, all the groups of Suras, with Brahmā and Viṣṇu as their leaders, gathered together on the top of Mem and began their deliberation and discussion: "We have been tormented by Rāvaṇa through his penance, very difficult to be performed (by others)."
[End]
Logical explanation - vishnu went with all his comrades (including Brahma, Indra and other Sur's) to a region, they all exclaimed and let out their frustration's, one of their complaints was that they were tormented by Ravan. Before Vishnu claimed he was tormented a line was in the text that he was conquered by Ravana like Indradev too.
=============
Pashupata of Ravan vs Vishnu.
Vishnu's weakness toward it;
{quote}
"In the universe there is no being including even Brahma and Vishnu and the deities, that are incapable of being slain by that weapon."
{end}
Ravan owns Pasupat Astra;
[Quote]
"Ravana took up the Celestial and dreadful Pashupata weapon, the increaser of fear in the Three Worlds, obtained from Rudra, by virtue of his rigid penances. Beholding this, all moveable and immoveable beings were stricken with terror and the Three Worlds, including all that was animate and inanimate, Gods and Serpents, together took refuge in their abodes under the earth."
[End]
Had every divya astra known till that time period.
[quote]
"He who is a marksman of every divine missile, and an ever interdictor of Vedic-rituals."
[eNd]
==-----==
Ravan & the Sudarshan Chakra.
[quote 1]
"His body bears hundreds of welts caused when assaulted with Vishnu-disc for hundreds of times in wars with gods, and when assaulted for hundreds of times with the other assaults-missiles in other gruesome wars as well."
[end]
[Quote 2]
"Those arms had wounds made by stabbing from the pointed edges of tusks of Iraavata and fleshy shoulders smeared with diamond and hit by Vishnu chakra."
[End 2]
=---=
Detail's of the 2 mountain's Ravan lifted (third is Kailash but i exclude it).
Meru
[Quote]
"Thou art Meru amongst mountains, thou art the Moon among all luminaries of the firmament, thou art Vasishtha amongst Rishis, thou art Surya among the planets."
[End]
Logic - here it's mentioned that Shiva is like Meru among every mountain. It was chosen above Kailash, Mandara etc.
[Quote]
"Behold that excellent and bright summit of the Meru, where sits the great sire with the celestials happy in self-knowledge. And next to the abode of Brahma is visible the region of him who is said to be the really primal Cause or the origin of all creatures, even that prime lord, god Narayana, having neither beginning nor end."
"And the region of the high-souled Vishnu, by its native splendour, exceeding in effulgence the sun or fire, cannot be beheld by the gods, or the Danavas. And the region of Narayana lies resplendent to the east of the Meru, where, O child, that lord of all creatures, the self-create primal Cause of the universe, having manifested all beings, looks splendid of his excellent grace. O child, not to speak of the Maharshi even Brahmarshis have no access to that place."
[End]
Meru's importance.
[quote]
"Between these two is a globular mountain called Meru made of gold."
[end]
"There, on that mountain, O king, the celestials, the Gandharvas, the Asuras, and the Rakshasas, accompanied by the tribes of Apsaras, always sport. There Brahman, and Rudra, and also Sakra the chief of the celestials, assembled together, performed diverse kinds of sacrifices with plentiful gifts."
Sukracharya was yet another individual living on top of Meru;
[quote]
"Upon the summit of that mountain, Usanas, otherwise called the Poet, sporteth with the Daityas. The jewels and gems (that we see) and all the mountains abounding in precious stones are of Meru."
[end]
Identity of location;
[quote]
"The sun, always circumambulates Meru, as also the moon with (his) attendant constellation, and the Wind-god too. The mountain, O king, is endued with celestial fruits and flowers, and it is covered all over with mansions made of furnished gold."
[end]
The width of meru parvat.
[Quote]
"there is that monarch of mountains the golden Meru extending over a space of thirty-three thousand Yojanas. And there, O Mudgala, are the sacred gardens of the celestials, with Nandana at their head, where sport"
[End]
Another description;
[quote]
"There is a unique and kingly mountain in the midst of that range of golden mountains, which is called Mt. Meru, or Saavrni Meru."
[end]
Height of Meru:
[quote]
"Is a globular mountain called Meru made of gold. Effulgent as the morning sun, it is like fire without smoke. It is eighty-four thousand Yojanas high, and, O king, its depth also is eighty-four Yojanas. It standeth bearing the worlds above, below and transversely. Besides Meru are situated."
[end]
Logic - did namard's like parshuram, karna, bhishma, sahastrarjun, balrama etc ever do anything similarly impressive?
=====
Mandara:
[Quote]
"Pārvatī stayed behind in Mandara mountain awaiting for the return of the lord."
(End)
Logical result; he should be able to lift vishnu's entire kingdom up then, his kingdom is the abode/city of vaikuntha.
[Quote]
"Abandoning the Vaiṣṇava shrines hereof on the earth, Lord Viṣṇu too went to Mandara where the Lord of the Devas, the consort of Umā, resided."
[End]
[quote]
"And you have to search on the peak of mount Mandara, where some extensive and unsightly beings are harboured, and at places where some other beings live with odd physical features. Some of them have no ears, while some have their lips as their ears. Some are with grisly faces like iron-faced-beings while some beings, although they are single-footed, yet they are very rapid."
"While some tribals are unkillable and mighty man-eaters, some other have golden complexion, and they will be pleasant in their appearance with towering wisps. Some other tribals who live on islands budging underwater as they are raw fish eaters and they are observed upon as horrific man-tigers. Half-man and half-tiger, like mermaids."
[end]
Proving that he lifted it.
[Quote]
"Though he was able to lift up Himavat, Mandara and Meru mountains as also the Three Worlds with the Gods."
[End]
Logic - Meru is where brahma resided with Narayan as well.
He lifted a 4th mountain because Himavat & Kailash are two different ones. So total is four, Ravana lifted that many mountain's.
But at the end of the day Ravan literally lifted Vishnu, Brahma etc.
Vishnu never lifted a single mountain, and even if he did their is no record of any mountain exceeding the weight and size of Meru, Mandara etc.
Ultimate CONCLUSION;
When u consider the fact ravan didnt use a weapon but tanked over a hundred sudarshan chakras on his body, he was a wielder of pasupat astra & he lifted vishnu's abode up once, also lifted other mountain's, i dont think their is any problem in saying Ravan WAS EQUAL TO OR A BETTER WARRIOR THAN Vishnu himself.
Another possiblity - maybe vishnu's power is dependent on the number of bhakt's and devotees he had. If he has a million worshipers than his power is high but if someone takes away the lives of these devotees then the power of vishnu would also decrease.
Nonetheless this would be ravan's biggest accomplishment, defeating Vishnu himself.
I am not a fan of ravan so i dont want to be called a ravan tard or fanboy etc. I simply judge people unbiasedly based entirely on their skills as warrior's and fighters.
Ravan would have killed hanuman's dad vayu dev but he shows alot of mercy to his enemy.
ReplyDeleteNo, Hanuman was more powerful than ravana. He was a Rudra avatara and Shiva had once defeated ravana when he was going to lift the Kailasa mountain. Even admits that Hanuman is more powerful than him in valmiki ramayana.
ReplyDeleteततस् तलेन अभिहतो वानरेण महात्मना || ६-५९-६२
दशग्रीवह् समाधूतो यथा भूमि चले अचलह् |
62. tataH = then; dashagriivaH = Ravana; abhihataH = struck; tena vaanareNa = by that monkey; Hanuma; mahaatmanaa = the mighty; samaadhuutaH = was shaken; achalaH yathaa = like a mountain; bhuumichale = during an earth-quake.
Under the violent impact of the blow of the mighty Hanuma Ravana shook like a mountain when the earth trembles.
सम्ग्रामे तम् तथा दृष्ट्व रावणम् तल ताडितम् || ६-५९-६३
ऋषयो वानराह् सिद्धा नेदुर् देवाह् सह असुराह् |
63. dR^iSTvaa = beholding; tam raavaNam = that Ravana; tathaa = thus; talataaDitam = struck by a palm; samgraame = in the battle; R^iSayaH = the sages; vaanaraaH = monkeys; siddhaaH = semi = divine beings; asuraiH saha = along with the demons; devaaH = and celestials; neduH = made a resounding approbation.
Beholding Ravana struck in the fight by Hanuma's palm; the sages, monkeys, semi-divine beings, along with celestials and demons raised a resounding approbation.
अथ आश्वस्य महा तेजा रावणो वाक्यम् अब्रवीत् || ६-५९-६४
साधु वानर वीर्येण श्लाघनीयो असि मे रिपुह् |
64. atha = thereafter; mahaatejaaH = the extremely spirited; raavaNaH = Ravana; aashvasya = after regaining his breath; abraviit = spoke; vaakyam = the following words; vaanara = O; monkey!; sadhu = well done;; well done!; viiryeNa = by your valour; asi = you are; me = my; ripuH = enemy; shlaaghaniiya = worthy of praise.
Then, the extremely spirited Ravana, having regained his breath, spoke the following words: "Well done! Well done! O, monkey! You are my adversary, worthy of praise by your valour!"
ततः क्रुद्धो वायुसुतो रावणं समभिद्रवत् |
आजघानोरसि क्रुद्धो वज्रकल्पेन मुष्टिना || ६-५९-११४
114. tataH = thereafter; kruddhaH = the enraged; vaayusutaH = Hanuma the son of the wind-God; samabhidravat = rushed; raavaNam = towards Ravana; aajaghaana = and struck; kruddhah = angrily; urasi = in the chest-portion; muSTinaa = with his fist; vajra kalpena = which was resembling a thunder bolt.
Thereupon, the enraged Hanuma the son of the Wind-God, rushed towards Ravana and struck angrily on his chest with his fist, resembling a thunder-bolt.
तेन मुष्टिप्रहारेण रावणो राक्षसेश्वरः |
जानुभ्यामगमद्भूमौ चचाल च पपात च || ६-५९-११५
115. tena = by that; muSTiprahaareNa = blow of the fist; raavaNaH = Ravana; raakSaseshvaraH = the Lord of Demons; chachaala = reeled; apatat cha = and fell; jaanubhyaam = on his knees; bhuumau = to the ground.
By that blow of the fist, Ravana the Lord of Demons reeled and fell on his knees to the ground.
आस्यैश्च नेत्रैः श्रवणैः पपात रुधिरं बहु |
विघार्णमानो निश्चेष्टो रथोपस्थ उपाचिशत् || ६-५९-११६
116. bahu = a lot of; rudhiram = blood; papaata = oozed; asyaiH cha = from his face; netraiH = from his eyes; shravaNaiH = from his ears; vighuurNamaanaH = Reeled; nishcheSTaH = and motionless; upavishat = he sat; rathopasthe = in the middle of the chariot.
A lot of blood oozed out from his face, eyes, and ears. Reeled and motionless, he became and sat in the middle of the chariot.
Firstly shiva beating Ravana happened in uttar kanda which's fake. Your next point about hanuman being a rudra aansh or avtar is also a false claim.
DeleteRead this;
"Aja, Ekapada, Ahivradhna, the unvanquished Pinakin, Rita, Pitrirupa, the three-eyed Maheswara, Vrishakapi, Sambhu, Havana, and Iswara--these are the celebrated Rudras, eleven in number, who are the lords of all the worlds."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b115.htm
ultimate conclusion - your hanutati or Hanuman was not among the mighty Rudras.
"He lifted a 4th mountain because Himavat & Kailash are two different ones. So total is four, Ravana lifted that many mountain's." This is the line which is written in this blog post. So, you are exposing this blog owner yourself. Because he mentions ravana trying to lift Kailasa which is mentioned in uttar Kanda. This means that ravana was not that much powerful to lift Kailasa if uttara Kanda is fake
DeleteAnd he was also not powerful to lift the weight of Shiva
DeleteThe 11 forms of Rudra and avatara of Rudra are two different things. For example: Vishnu has 3 forms- Mahā Vishnu, Garbhodakaśāyī Vishnu and Ksirodakaśāyī Vishnu. And he has taken almost 24 avatars. Here avatars and forms are different things. Hanuman is mentioned as an avatar of Shiva or Rudra in the Sanskrit texts like Mahabhagvata Purana, Skanda Purana, Brhaddharma Purana and Mahanataka among others. It is believed that Panchamukha Hanuman is the 11th rudra of Lord Shiva. This blog owner has the help of puranas to glorify ravana. So, there is nothing wrong to glorify Hanuman by using puranas.
DeleteNo i said "shiva beating ravana" is fake not "ravan lifting kailash" so you are misunderstanding my statement's, comment and words. Still even if he didnt lift kailash at least ravan lifted MERU and MANDARA 2 mountains bigger than Kailash, one which had vishnus presence on it.
DeleteNow you started writing your own uttara Kanda. Great!!!
DeleteUttara Kanda states that ravana was not able to bear the weight of Shiva's toes for 1000 years
DeleteAnd height of kailash doesn't actually matters because Kailasa is smaller than mount everest still no one has able to climb it because of lord shiva's presence. So lifting Kailasa is also not possible easily because of lord shiva
DeleteNo i never even hinted at rewriting Uttara Kandam or changing the content that is provided in it.
DeleteBut Uttara Kandam mentioned Ravan having Pashupat Astra, which Vishnu is vulnerable too.
Dont compare the real mountain (Everest) against Kailash. Our conversation is about puranas and ramayan characters.
Then how do you prove that kailash was also fake? I am comparing the height of a real mountain with a real mountain
DeleteFirst you wrote: "No i said "shiva beating ravana" is fake not "ravan lifting kailash" so you are misunderstanding my statement's, comment and words."
DeleteThen you said that you are not changing the content.
"No i never even hinted at rewriting Uttara Kandam or changing the content that is provided in it."
In valmiki ramayana, Rama also possesses pashupatastra. Valmiki ramayana Bala Kanda, sarga 27
DeleteOK, if you want to talk about only puranic mountains. Then let's take one mountain - meru mountain. It was climbed by Valery Babanov at it is 6660 m high. Little bit bigger than kailash. Ravana was able to lift it but he failed in lifting kailash.
DeleteTheir are quotes from Mahabharat and Ramayan both that prove Meru had the presence of Lord Vishnu himself on it. Not only purans, read the post on the blog itself. And for Bala Kanda in which Ram had Pashu Pata it is a fake claim. Ram did not have all these astras, he never uses a pashupata on Meghanad, Wiradh, Viswavasu or Kabandha. He also did not use one on Ravan either.
DeleteThen prove baal Kanda, sarga 27 wrong. Also no one has ever used pashupata on rama
DeleteFirst you wrote your own uttara Kanda and then writing your own valmiki ramayana. Provide any linguistic evidence to prove that sarga 27 of baal Kanda is a later addition. And also using sarukta and Nirukta
Delete1st - HOW did i write my own Uttar Kand?
Delete2nd - For why sarga 27 (of bal kanda) is in my view not reliable (its not interpolated) is that it described Vishwamitr as giving Ram the pashu pat Astra, that must mean that brahmin (vishwamitr) also had it with him. Why didnt he ever use that weapon on Tadka, Subahu or Mareech?
Also why didnt Ram use that Pashupat Astra on any of the warriors he faced? It could have saved him from Meghanad.
3rd - My personal opinion is that VISHWAMITR GAVE RAM alot of weaponry but it would be IMPOSSIBLE for him to give Ram any type of pashupat astra. He also could not have given Ram the chakrams (DISC'S) of vishnu, indra, dharma, shiva etc. That whole sarga made no sense and lacks a cross reference. The amount of weapons is an obviously clear exaggeration.
4th - I NEVER EVER SAID ANYONE USED pashupat astra on Rama in a fight.
5th - If you want we can turn our conversation over to google chat/hangouts (where it is easier to reply to eachother).
"The Mahabharata, Book 3: Vana Parva: Kairata Parva: Section XL"
DeleteO thou of mighty arms, that weapon is superior to the Brahma, the Narayana, the Aindra, the Agneya, and the Varuna weapons. Verily, it is capable of neutralising every other weapon in the universe. It was with that weapon that the illustrious Mahadeva had in days of yore, burnt and consumed in a moment the triple city of the Asuras. With the greatest ease, O Govinda, Mahadeva, using that single arrow, achieved that feat. That weapon, shot by Mahadeva's arms, can, without doubt consume in half the time taken up by a twinkling of the eyes the entire universe with all its mobile and immobile creatures. In the universe there is no being including Brahma, Vishnu and the Goddess Lakshmi, Parvati, Sarasvati that are incapable of being slain by that weapon.
If you disagree with sarga 27 of baal Kanda because Rama has not used pashupata astra on anyone then you should also discard that part of uttar Kanda which says that ravana possesses pashupata astra Because ravana has not used it one.
DeleteNo because Ravan actually used Pashupat Astra on a warrior but Ram never did. And Vishwamitr having such a big arsenal of weapons makes 0 sense.
DeleteVishwamitra had done penance to please shiva and he granted him the pashupata astra to defeat vashishtha
DeleteValmiki ji ne tumhari iccha se ramayan nhi likhi thi. Ki jab man hua you will say sarga 27 of baal Kanda, Valmiki ramayana fake and sometimes shiva defeating ravana in uttara Kanda is fake. Valmiki ji ko ramayan ki story batayi gyi thi unhone likhi. You are not talking not the basis of facts and references. You are only distorting ramayana on your own interest. And you are trying to hide every faults and weakness of ravana.
DeleteProof that you are distorting and adding spice in valmiki ramayana and uttara Kanda and create your own valmiki ramayana and uttara Kanda without any evidence:
1. Firstly shiva beating Ravana happened in uttar kanda which's fake
2. No i said "shiva beating ravana" is fake not "ravan lifting kailash" so you are misunderstanding my statement's, comment and words.
3. But Uttara Kandam mentioned Ravan having Pashupat Astra, which Vishnu is vulnerable too.
4. And for Bala Kanda in which Ram had Pashu Pata it is a fake claim. Ram did not have all these astras, he never uses a pashupata on Meghanad, Wiradh, Viswavasu or Kabandha. He also did not use one on Ravan either.
5. For why sarga 27 (of bal kanda) is in my view not reliable (its not interpolated) is that it described Vishwamitr as giving Ram the pashu pat Astra, that must mean that brahmin (vishwamitr) also had it with him. Why didnt he ever use that weapon on Tadka, Subahu or Mareech?
Also why didnt Ram use that Pashupat Astra on any of the warriors he faced? It could have saved him from Meghanad.
6. My personal opinion is that VISHWAMITR GAVE RAM alot of weaponry but it would be IMPOSSIBLE for him to give Ram any type of pashupat astra. He also could not have given Ram the chakrams (DISC'S) of vishnu, indra, dharma, shiva etc. That whole sarga made no sense and lacks a cross reference. The amount of weapons is an obviously clear exaggeration.
7. No because Ravan actually used Pashupat Astra on a warrior but Ram never did. And Vishwamitr having such a big arsenal of weapons makes 0 sense.
It was ur namard Ram that was defeated by Ravan at sarga 59 since ram himself said "i am the gandu who killed doosan and khar in dandaka van" "i was the one who brave ravana felled with his spear from toys r us, not laxmanji" LOL
Deleteravan used pasupata on MANDHATA
It is clear that between the 2 Ravan was THE BETTER WARRIOR. And this hanuman or rather (HANUTATI) was a amatuer novice that was raped
DeleteHanuman had 8 Siddhis and 9 nidhis.
ReplyDeleteAccording to different sources, below are the eight classical siddhis (Ashta Siddhi) or eight great perfections are:
Aṇimā: the ability to become smaller than the smallest, reducing one's body to the size of an atom or even become invisible.
Mahimā: the ability to become infinitely large, expanding one's body to an infinitely large size.
Laghimā: the ability to become weightless or lighter than air.
“Garimā”: the ability to become heavy or dense
Prāpti: the ability to instantaneously summon any item the user is aware of at any given moment.
Prākāmya: the ability to achieve or realize whatever one desires.
Īśiṭva: the ability to control nature, individuals, organisms, etc. Supremacy over nature and ability to force influence upon anyone.
Vaśiṭva: the ability to control all material elements or natural forces.
The eighth is given as either:
Kāma-avasayitva (per Kṣemarāja and Vyasa): satisfaction, suppression of desire, or (as Yatrakāmāvasāyitva) wishes coming true.Garimā (per the Rāmānanda Sampradāya): the ability to become infinitely heavy and be immovable by anyone or anything.
According to Amarakosha, the Nine nidhis are:
Mahapadma "great lotus flower"Padma "lotus flower"Shankha "conch"Makara "crocodile"Kachchhapa "tortoise"Kumud "a particular precious stone"Kunda "jasmine"Nila "sapphire"Kharva "dwarf"
When considered as mines, minerals, earthenware, and ocean resources, the nine treasures of Kubera are interpreted as:
mahapadma (lake double the size of Padma in Himalaya with minerals and jewels)padma (lake in Himalaya with minerals and jewels)shankha (conch shell)makara (synonym of Padmini, black antimony)kachchhapa (tortoise or turtle shell)kumud (cinnabar, or quicksilver)kunda (arsenic)nila (antimony)kharva (cups or vessels baked in fire)
Bro these all siddhis are fake and not true.
DeleteThey are made up by a bunch of dick less namard's and chutiyas that raped little kid's.
No reference to mahabharat/ramayan concerned these "siddis" you are farting from your stomach.
स तस्मात् पादपात् धीमान् आप्लुत्य प्लवग ऋषभः |
Deleteततो वर्धितुम् आरेभे सीता प्रत्यय कारणात् || ५-३७-३४
34. saH = that Hanuma; dhiimaan = the intelligent; plavagarSabhaH = and the excellent of monkeys; aaplutya = jumped down; tasmaat paadapaat = from that tree; tataH = and then; siitaapratyayakaaraNaat = to creat confidence in Seetha; aarebhe = started; vardhitum = to increase (his body).
Hanuma, the intelligent and the excellent of monkeys, leaped down from that tree and then, to create confidence in Seetha, started to increase his body-form.
This is called laghima
The 8 siddhis and 9 nidhis are mentioned in Hanuman chalisa.
DeleteThis blog owner has taken the help of puranas to glorify ravana. So, there is nothing wrong to glorify Hanuman by using puranas. And tulsi Das was a puranic devotee of Hanuman.
For Hanuman Chaleesa/Charitra it is NOT A PURANA its not among any of the Purans in HInduism. So NO you can not ever use that as a source.
DeleteIn my PERSONAL OPINION i believe and think that u are an arjuna fan who is SIMPING for hanuman to get approval from ignorant ram bhakts and retarded hindus.
Being an Arjun fan was not the main topic of the debate. In that case, you can call ravana as a andhbhakt of Shiva because he defeated your favorite ravana and still ravana blindly believed him. And Shiva didn't helped him at the time of his death
DeleteBut shiva helped Rama instead for reaching Lanka and killing ravana
DeleteHmmm... well despite reading Ramayan myself i have yet to find a incident where Ram was aided by Shiva in his journey to lanka. I read that the Ocean God, Vibeeshan, Hanuman (these 3 people besides the vanara named "NALA") were aiding Rama in that journey.
DeleteWhen it comes to the death of Ravan then it's been explained previously on this blog that Indra, Matali and Kuber were the ones who helped Ram the most in the death of Ravan, when it comes to Shiva no matter how powerful he was the god (shiva) never had any role to play in the death of Ravan.
Do u have a single reference to prove Shiva was helping Ram kill Ravan?
FOR YOUR OTHER COMMENTS
When it comes to authenticity here than after Valmiki's Ramayan the most authentic is Ramopakhyana (which Yudhisthir studied in van parva).
After that PURANS then NOTHING ELSE. In which puran was Tulsidas given respect?
And WHAT IS THE AUTHENTICITY OF HANUMAN CHALISA?
I have explained it earlier about Hanuman chalisa. And second point is that killing ravana was the work of Rama. And shiva helped him in reaching Lanka. I mixed both the phrases together so that there will be no need to type much
Deletehanuman chalisa just appears to be a verse by Tulsidas... he is not a reliable source at all
DeleteYour useless idol hanutati and namard ram were defeated by pakistanis
Delete"Unable to conquer my husband in a combat, but able to earbash your name to a lonely woman and abducting her, will this tantamount to your apparently audacious audacity? Thus, I am not really triumphed over by a lowly demon like you... [3-53-6]
DeleteDont u know that Seetha MATA said Laxman was a lustful pervert and coward?
DeleteHow can such a whore and prostitute/randi of arya varth be taken seriously?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
A message to blog owner: you are exposing your own hypocrisy. U said that u judge people in a unbiased way. And when I criticized Ravana with reference from valmiki ramayana and uttara Kanda. you deleted all those comments. This indicates that you also have a biased character like these Ravan bhakts who spreading cringe in the comment section
ReplyDeleteI dont think i deleted any comments (unless they were offensive) but at the end of the day comments could be removed without my knowledge/awareness, they can be marked as spam. I will check the spam option and notify u if those comments are restored.
DeleteI do favors to eunuchs like hanumanji.
By saying cringe I meant terrorist comments in the name of terrorist Ravan 🤣
ReplyDeleteBut Parshuram was the real terrorist who cut the penises of baby kshatriyas in Maheeshmati.
DeleteThose kshatriyas were (as per Purans and Uttar Kand) enemies to Ravan right?
Yet these enemies of Ravan were killed by Parshurama. Indirectly he favored Ravan over the kshatriyas.
What serial is that Ravana from in the first picture ??
ReplyDelete1st of all i dont know if ur on my side or against me, and i havent been replying lately to certain comment's due to a illness i got. But i will answer your question.
Delete2nd - that PHOTO IS FROM "vignaharta Ganesha" a tv serial on youtube, where ravan was played by 2 actors, its either from episode 426 or 425.
What i like about it is that they even made Ravan ask Shiva to give him Parvati once, they tried showing all of ravans tapasya to shiva.
3rd - But i personally believe most stories that associate ravan with shiva as being a bhakt are fake.
Vishnu does long penances himself before taking avatars to defeat Asuras. The long penances boosts the powers of Vishnu.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the point of ur comment?
DeleteHow to block this website?
ReplyDeleteBy admitting that vikarna & duhsasana were superior to parshurama/hanuman and even better than bhishma.
Delete